Brasil | Otro
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorFais, Laiza Maria Grassi
dc.creatorMarcelo, Caroline Canhizares
dc.creatorGuaglianoni, Dalton Geraldo
dc.creatorPinelli, Lígia Antunes Pereira
dc.creatorSilva, Regina Helena Barbosa Tavares da
dc.date2015-08-06T16:13:02Z
dc.date2016-10-25T20:53:37Z
dc.date2015-08-06T16:13:02Z
dc.date2016-10-25T20:53:37Z
dc.date2010
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T08:36:07Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T08:36:07Z
dc.identifierBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 9, n. 1, p. 39-42, 2010.
dc.identifier1677-3217
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/125757
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/125757
dc.identifierISSN1677-3217-2010-09-01-39-42.pdf
dc.identifier1778542696342978
dc.identifier0455968557454133
dc.identifierhttp://w2.fop.unicamp.br/brjorals/contents9_1.htm
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/936350
dc.descriptionAim: In this study, a mass-loss method was used to verify whether bovine enamel has the same wear pattern as human enamel in cutting efficiency tests of diamond burs. Methods: Seventy-two teeth were used: 36 human molars (HT) and 36 bovine mandibular central incisors (BT). The enamel of the teeth was cut using diamond bur #1092 attached to a high-speed handpiece under controlled pressure (50-80 g). Each bur (n=12) cut for a total of 72 min, divided into 6 periods of 12 min each (12-min, 24-min, 36-min, 48-min, 60-min, and 72-min). The amount of enamel removed was determined by the difference between pre- and post-cut tooth masses. Results: The mean amounts (g) of enamel removed were: HT- 12-min=0.11; 24-min=0.12; 36-min=0.11; 48-min=0.11; 60-min=0.10; 72-min=0.12; BT- 12-min=0.12; 24-min=0.15; 36-min=0.15; 48- min=0.13; 60-min=0.16; 72-min=0.14. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test, and the results showed statistically significant differences between human and bovine teeth (p<0.001) and among the cutting periods (p<0.001).Conclusions: It was concluded that the cutting efficiency of the burs was different between the tested substrates, and that bovine enamel underwent greater mass loss than did human enamel.
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.languagepor
dc.relationBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTeeth
dc.subjectDental enamel
dc.subjectCattle
dc.subjectEfficiency
dc.subjectDiamond
dc.titleHuman teeth versus bovine teeth: cutting effectiviness of diamond burs
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución