Connective tissue graft as a biological barrier for guided tissue regeneration in intrabony defects: a histological study in dogs

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorRibeiro, Fernando Salimon
dc.creatorPontes, Ana EmÍlia Farias
dc.creatorZuza, Elizangela Partata
dc.creatorSilva, Vanessa Camila da
dc.creatorLia, Raphael Carlos Comelli
dc.creatorMarcantonio Júnior, Elcio
dc.date2015-08-06T16:12:40Z
dc.date2016-10-25T20:53:20Z
dc.date2015-08-06T16:12:40Z
dc.date2016-10-25T20:53:20Z
dc.date2014
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T08:35:06Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T08:35:06Z
dc.identifierClinical Oral Investigations, v. 19, n. 5, p. 997–1004, 2014.
dc.identifier1436-3771
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/125632
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/125632
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1323-1
dc.identifier6100859465871929
dc.identifierhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00784-014-1323-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/936228
dc.descriptionBackground The use of the autogenous periosteal graft as biological barrier has been proposed for periodontal regeneration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the histometric findings of the subepithelial connective tissue graft as barrier in intrabony defects compared to a bioabsorbable membrane. Methods Three-walled intrabony defects were created surgically in the mesial aspect of the right and left maxillary canines in five healthy mongrel dogs. The defects were chronified, and two types of barriers were randomly carried out for guided tissue regeneration in a split-mouth design: the test group with a subepithelial connective tissue graft and the control group with a bioabsorbable membrane. The specimens were processed for histometric analyses of the epithelium (E), connective tissue (CT), newly formed cementum (NC), new bone (NB), and total newly formed tissues (NFT). Results The test side showed smaller mean of NC (3.6±1.2), NB (2.1±0.7), and NFT (7.7±0.8) than the control group (NC 7.3±0.5; NB 5.3±1.3; NFT 10.1±2.2; P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were verified for E (test 3.1±2.0; control 2.8±2.1; P>0.05) and CT (test 2.5±1.1; control 2.0± 0.5; P>0.05) between groups
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.languageeng
dc.relationClinical Oral Investigations
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectConnective tissue graft(s)
dc.subjectGuided tissue regeneration
dc.subjectPeriodontal regeneration
dc.subjectHistology
dc.titleConnective tissue graft as a biological barrier for guided tissue regeneration in intrabony defects: a histological study in dogs
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución