dc.creatorCortez-Saldarriaga, M.
dc.creatorQuiroz-Villarán, S.
dc.creatorCaycho-Rodriguez, T.
dc.creatorHernandez-Mendo, A.
dc.creatorFerreira-Brandao, M.
dc.creatorReyes-Bossio, M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-08T22:27:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T03:03:01Z
dc.date.available2022-07-08T22:27:26Z
dc.date.available2024-05-07T03:03:01Z
dc.date.created2022-07-08T22:27:26Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.identifier15788423
dc.identifier10.6018/cpd.487641
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10757/660254
dc.identifier19895879
dc.identifierCuadernos de Psicologia del Deporte
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85129940063
dc.identifierSCOPUS_ID:85129940063
dc.identifier0000 0001 2196 144X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9329178
dc.description.abstractTo measure athlete's success and his sports performance, it is required to quantify the maximum performance developed during seasons of trainings and championships; using a valid, reliable, and adapted to peruvian context instrument. However, caution is urged when considering there is no psychometric evidence to support the use of any scale related to peruvian high performance athletes' sample. The current study was designed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Sports Performance Psychological Inventory (IPED) in the mentioned sample. Method: Participated 255 peruvian athletes with ages between 14 and 38 years (N:23; SD: 4.29); who actively represents the country and in sports modalities affiliated with the Peruvian Sports Institute (IPD). For the collection of information, a sociodemographic record, Sports Performance Psychological Inventory (IPED) and the Mental Toughness Questionnaire (MTQ) were used. Results: IPED model demonstrated, that the seven-dimensional model had an acceptable fit (SBx2 = 2243.096 / df = 798; CFI=. 955; SRMR=. 095; RMSEA=. 084 [IC90%:. 080 -. 069] and reliability analyses revealed high internal consistency (ω =. 841 > ω =. 754). In addition, scores correlated positively between IPP and MTQ dimensions (AC=. 678; CAN=. 557; CAT=. 457; CVI=. 328; NM=. 425; CAP=. 641; CAC=. 662) and Control (AC=. 558; CAN=. 733; CAT=. 682; CVI=. 171; NM=. 272; CAP=. 432; CAC=. 563) Conclusion: The IPED provides adequate evidence of validity and reliability to measure sports performance
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Murcia Servicio de Publicaciones
dc.relationhttps://revistas.um.es/cpd/article/view/487641
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.sourceUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)
dc.sourceRepositorio Academico - UPC
dc.sourceCuadernos de Psicologia del Deporte
dc.source22
dc.source2
dc.source115
dc.source135
dc.subjectAtletas qualificados
dc.subjectConfiabilidad
dc.subjectConfiabilidade
dc.subjectDeportistas calificados
dc.subjectDesempenho esportivo
dc.subjectEjecución deportiva
dc.subjectIPED
dc.subjectIPED
dc.subjectIPED
dc.subjectpsicologia do esporte
dc.subjectPsicología Deportiva
dc.subjectQualified athletes
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectSport Psychology
dc.subjectSports performance
dc.subjectValidade
dc.subjectValidez
dc.subjectValidity
dc.titlePsychometric Properties of the Sport Performance Psychological Inventory in qualified Peruvian athletes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución