dc.creatorLópez-Herce, Jesús
dc.creatorAlmonte, Enma
dc.creatorAlvarado, Manuel
dc.creatorBogado, Norma Beatriz
dc.creatorCyunel, Mariana
dc.creatorEscalante, Raffo
dc.creatorFinardi, Christiane
dc.creatorGuzmán, Gustavo
dc.creatorJaramillo-Bustamante, Juan C.
dc.creatorMadrid, Claudia C.
dc.creatorMatamoros, Martha
dc.creatorMoya, Luis Augusto
dc.creatorObando, Grania
dc.creatorReboredo, Gaspar
dc.creatorLópez, Lissette R.
dc.creatorScheu, Christian
dc.creatorValenzuela, Alejandro
dc.creatorYerovi, Rocío
dc.creatorYock-Corrales, Adriana
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-02T16:04:36Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-06T19:57:13Z
dc.date.available2018-05-02T16:04:36Z
dc.date.available2024-05-06T19:57:13Z
dc.date.created2018-05-02T16:04:36Z
dc.date.issued2018-03
dc.identifierLatin American Consensus for Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation 2017 2018, 19 (3):e152 Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
dc.identifier1529-7535
dc.identifier10.1097/PCC.0000000000001427
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10757/623480
dc.identifierPediatric Critical Care Medicine
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9293005
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To develop a Latin American Consensus about Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. To clarify, reinforce, and adapt some specific recommendations for pediatric patients and to stimulate the implementation of these recommendations in clinical practice. Design: Expert consensus recommendations with Delphi methodology. Setting: Latin American countries. Subjects: Experts in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation from 19 Latin American countries. Interventions: Delphi methodology for expert consensus. Measurements and Main Results: The goal was to reach consensus with all the participating experts for every recommendation. An agreement of at least 80% of the participating experts had to exist in order to deliver a recommendation. Two Delphi voting rounds were sent out electronically. The experts were asked to score between 1 and 9 their level of agreement for each recommendation. The score was then classified into three groups: strong agreement (score 7–9), moderate agreement (score 4–6), and disagreement (score 1–3). Nineteen experts from 19 countries participated in both voting rounds and in the whole process of drafting the recommendations. Sixteen recommendations about organization of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, prevention, basic resuscitation, advanced resuscitation, and postresuscitation measures were approved. Ten of them had a consensus of 100%. Four of them were agreed by all the participants except one (94.7% consensus). One recommendation was agreed by all except two experts (89.4%), and finally, one was agreed by all except three experts (84.2%). All the recommendations reached a level of agreement. Conclusions: This consensus adapts 16 international recommendations to Latin America in order to improve the practice of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children. Studies should be conducted to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of these recommendations.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.relationhttp://Insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00130478-201803000-00025
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)
dc.sourceRepositorio Academico - UPC
dc.subjectCardiac arrest
dc.subjectCardiopulmonary resuscitation
dc.subjectChildren
dc.subjectPediatric resuscitation
dc.subjectResuscitation
dc.titleLatin American Consensus for Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation 2017
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución