dc.creator | Nahsan, Flavia Pardo Salata | |
dc.creator | Wang, Linda | |
dc.creator | Modena, Karin Silva | |
dc.creator | Francisconi Dos Rios, Luciana Fàvaro | |
dc.creator | Silva, Luciana Mendonça da | |
dc.creator | Calabria, Marcela Pagani | |
dc.creator | Casas-Apayco, Leslie | |
dc.creator | Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-27T20:50:40Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-06T19:27:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-27T20:50:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-06T19:27:38Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-04-27T20:50:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-03 | |
dc.identifier | A 12-month clinical trial examining the effects of a surface sealant on Class I composite resin restorations., 64 (2):18-20 Gen Dent | |
dc.identifier | 0363-6771 | |
dc.identifier | 26943083 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10757/607232 | |
dc.identifier | General dentistry (Gen Dent.) | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9290224 | |
dc.description.abstract | A split-mouth, double-blind trial evaluated the effects of a surface sealant on the clinical performance of Class I composite resin restorations. In 16 patients, 27 pairs of maxillary and mandibular molars or premolars with Class I carious lesions or unsatisfactory restorations were restored with composite resin. For each pair, 1 surface was sealed with surface sealant. Clinical evaluations of marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, anatomical form, and secondary caries were performed by 2 experienced operators using modified US Public Health Service criteria 1-2 weeks and 6 and 12 months after treatment. Data were analyzed with the McNemar test (P < 0.05). After 6 months, only 1 (4%) sealed restoration presented a Bravo rating for marginal integrity. After 12 months, the Bravo ratings for marginal integrity were 2 (7%) for sealed restorations and 1 (4%) for nonsealed restorations. Restorations received a score of Alfa for all other parameters at all time periods. There were no statistically significant differences within or between the sealed and nonsealed groups (P = 1.0). The use of a surface sealant did not improve the clinical performance of posterior composite resin Class I restorations. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Chicago, Academy of General Dentistry | |
dc.relation | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26943083 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | |
dc.source | Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC) | |
dc.source | Repositorio Académico - UPC | |
dc.subject | US Public Health Service criteria | |
dc.subject | Composite resin | |
dc.subject | Surface-penetrating sealant | |
dc.subject | Class I restoration | |
dc.title | A 12-month clinical trial examining the effects of a surface sealant on Class I composite resin restorations. | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |