Data Envelopment Analysis to measure relative performance based on key indicators from a supply network with reverse logistics

Análisis Envolvente de Datos (DEA) para medir el desempeño relativo basado en indicadores de una red de abastecimiento con Logística Inversa

dc.creatorArdila Gamboa, César David
dc.creatorBallesteros Riveros, Frank Alexander
dc.date2019-02-12T00:53:12Z
dc.date2019-02-12T00:53:12Z
dc.date2018-12-20
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T20:11:41Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T20:11:41Z
dc.identifierC. Ardila Gamboa y F. Ballesteros Riveros, “Data Envelopment Analysis to measure relative performance based on key indicators from a supply network with reverse logistics” INGE CUC, vol. 14, no. 2, pp.137-146, 2018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.13
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11323/2395
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.13
dc.identifier10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.13
dc.identifier2382-4700
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifier0122-6517
dc.identifierREDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9174707
dc.descriptionIntroduction− Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to measure the relative performance of a series of distribution centers (DCs), using key indicators based on reverse logistics for a company that produces electric and electronic supplies in Colombia.Objective−The aim is to measure the relative perfor-mance of distribution centers based on Key Performance Indicators (KPI) from a supply network with reverse logistics.Methodology−A DEA model is applied through 5 steps: KPIs selection; Data collection for all 18 DCs in the net-work; Build and run the DEA model; Identify the DCs that will be the focus of improvement; Analyze the DCs that restrict or diminish the total performance of the system.Results− KPIs are defined, data is collected and KPI’s for each DCs are presented. The DEA model is run and the relative efficiencies for each DCs are determined. A frontier analysis is made and DCs that limit or reduce the performance of the system are analyzed to find options for improving the system.Conclusions−Reverse logistics, brings numerous ad-vantages for companies. The analysis of the indicators allows logistics managers involved to make relevant deci-sions for higher performance. The DEA model identifies which DCs have a relative superior and inferior perfor-mance, making it easier to make informed decisions to change, increase or decrease resources, and activities or apply best practices that optimize the performance of the network.
dc.descriptionIntroducción− El análisis envolvente de datos (DEA), se usa para medir el desempeño relativo de una serie de centros de distribución (DCs), utilizando indicadores clave basados en logística inversa para una empresa que produce suministros eléctricos y electrónicos en Colombia.Objetivo− Medir el rendimiento relativo de los centros de distribución en función de indicadores clave (KPI) de una red de abastecimiento con logística inversa.Metodología− Se aplica un modelo DEA a través de 5 pasos: Selección de KPIs; Recopilación de datos para los 18 DCs en la red de distribución; Se construye y ejecuta el modelo DEA; Identificar los DCs que serán el foco de la mejora; Analizar los DCs que restringen o disminuyen el rendimiento total del sistema.Resultados− Inicialmente se definen KPI, a partir de los datos recolectados y se presentan los KPI para cada DCs. Se ejecuta el modelo DEA y se determinan las eficiencias relativas para cada DCs. Posteriormente, se realiza un análisis de la frontera y se analizan los DCs que limitan o reducen el rendimiento del sistema en busca de opciones para mejorar el sistema.Conclusiones− La logística inversa, trae numerosas ven-tajas para las empresas. El análisis de los indicadores permite a los gerentes de logística tomar decisiones rel-evantes para mejorar el desempeño del sistema. El mod-elo DEA identifica a los DCs que presentan rendimientos relativamente superiores e inferiores; lo cual facilita la toma de decisiones informadas para cambiar, aumentar o disminuir los recursos y las actividades, o aplicar las mejores prácticas que optimicen el rendimiento de la red.
dc.format10 páginas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.relationINGE CUC; Vol. 14, Núm. 2 (2018)
dc.relationINGE CUC
dc.relationINGE CUC
dc.relationS. Agrawal, R. Singh and Q. Murtaza, “A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 97, pp. 76-92, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.02.009
dc.relationN. Bahiraei, H. Panjehfouladgaran and R. Yusuff, “Ranking of critical success factors in reverse logistics by TOPSIS”, Presented at IEOM International Conference, pp. 1-5, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEOM.2015.7093787
dc.relationE. Bayraktar, E. Tatoglu and S. Zaim, “Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in Turkish public and private universities”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1810- 1830, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.2
dc.relationS. Çakir, S. Perçin and H. Min, “Evaluating the comparative efficiency of the postal services in OECD countries using context-dependent and measure-specific data envelopment analysis” Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 839-856, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2013-0098
dc.relationQ.Q. Chang and H.Z. Zheng, “An effective strategy for non-defective reverse logistics”. Presented at ICIA International Conference, pp. 1273-1277, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICInfA.2014.6932844
dc.relationW. Cook and J. Zhu, Data Envelopment Analysis: A Handbook on the Modelling of Internal Structures and Networks. New York, USA: Springer, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8068-7
dc.relationCouncil of Supply Chain Management Professionals, CSCMP Glossary [Online], 2013. Available: http://cscmp.org/
dc.relationK. Das, “Integrating reverse logistics into the strategic planning of a supply chain”, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1438–1456, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.571944
dc.relationA. Davoodi, H. Rezai and R. Fallahnejad, “Congestion analysis in DEA inputs under weight restrictions”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1089-1097, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.104
dc.relationJ. Ding, W. Dong, G. Bi and L. Liang, “A decision model for supplier selection in the presence of dual-role factors”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 737-746, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.53
dc.relationR. Dyson and E. Shale, “Data Envelopment Analysis, Operational Research and Uncertainty, Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 25-34, 2010. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40540225
dc.relationA. Faed, O.K. Hussain and E. Chang, “A methodology to map customer complaints and measure customer satisfaction and loyalty”, Service Oriented Computing and Applications, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 33-53, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-013-0142-6
dc.relationM. J. Farrell, “The measurement of productive efficiency”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 253-290, 1957. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
dc.relationP. Guarnieri, V. Sobreiro, M. Nagano and A. Marques, “The challenge of selecting and evaluating third-party reverse logistics providers in a multicriteria perspective: A Brazilian case”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 96, pp. 209-219, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.040
dc.relationS. Haghighi, S. Torabi and R. Ghasemi, “An integrated approach for performance evaluation in sustainable supply chain networks (with a case study)” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 137, pp. 579-597, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.119
dc.relationJ. R. Huscroft, B. T. Hazen, D. J. Hall and J. B. Hanna, Task-technology fit for reverse logistics performance. International Journal of Logistics Management, 24(2), 230-246, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2012-0011
dc.relationM. Izadikhah and R. F. Saen, “A new preference voting method for sustainable location planning using geographic information system and data envelopment analysis”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 137, pp. 1347-1367, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.021
dc.relationY. Jiang and H. Zheng, “A construction method of Enterprise reverse logistics based on bilateral resource integration”, Presented at ICIA International Conference, pp. 1268-1272, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICInfA.2014.6932843
dc.relationC. Kao, “Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 255, no. 3, pp. 778-786, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.019
dc.relationV. Lall, R. Lumb and A. Moreno, “Selection and Prioritization of Projects: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach” Indian Journal of Economics and Business, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 359-372, 2012.
dc.relationK. H. Lau, “Distribution network rationalisation through bench-marking with DEA”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 668-689, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771211284260
dc.relationK. Lieckens and N. Vandaele, “Multi-level reverse logistics network design under uncertainty”. International Journal of Production Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 23-40, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.571442
dc.relationS. Lim, “Context-dependent data envelopment analysis with cross-efficiency evaluation”. Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 38-46, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.29
dc.relationJ. S. Liu and W. M. Lu, “Network-based method for ranking of efficient units in two-stage DEA models”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1153-1164, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.132
dc.relationS. M. Mirhedayatian, M. Azadi and R. F. Saen, “A novel network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating green supply chain management”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 147(B). pp. 544-554, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.009
dc.relationA. Mostafaee, “An equitable method for allocating fixed costs by using data envelopment analysis”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 326- 335. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.56
dc.relationA. Shabani and R.F. Saen, “Developing a novel data envelopment analysis model to determine prospective benchmarks of green supply chain in the presence of dual-role factor”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 711-730, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2012-0087
dc.relationX. Shi, L. Li, L. Yang, Z. Li and J. Choi, “Information flow in reverse logistics: an industrial information integration study”, Information Technology and Management, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 217-232, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-012-0116-y
dc.relationB. Şimşek and F. Tüysüz, “An application of Network Data Envelopment Analysis with fuzzy data for the performance evaluation in cargo sector”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, (just-accepted), pp. 00-00, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2017-0026
dc.relationR. Skapa and A. Klapalová, “Reverse logistics in Czech companies: increasing interest in performance measurement”, Management Research Review, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 676- 692, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211247686
dc.relationC. C. Tu, S. H. Chang, C. J. Tu and A. C. Lee, “Study of the performance of reverse logistics for supply chain management”, Presented at IEEM International Conference, pp. 2323-2327, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674146
dc.relationC. Ya-Ping, “Cost and Benefit Analysis of Reverse Logistics”, Presented at International Conference on BCGIN, pp. 75-77, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/BCGIN.2012.26
dc.relationM. Zerafat, A. Emrouznejad and A. Mustafa, “Fuzzy data envelopment analysis: A discrete approach”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 2263-2269, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.118
dc.relationY. Zou, “Study on logistics operation cost control based on the DEA model”, Presented at MSIE International Conference, pp. 1025-1028, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSIE.2011.5707590
dc.relation146
dc.relation137
dc.relation2
dc.relation14
dc.relationINGE CUC
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourceINGE CUC
dc.sourcehttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/view/1783
dc.subjectData envelopment analysis
dc.subjectRelative performance
dc.subjectReverse logistics
dc.subjectReturnable packages
dc.subjectWarehousing
dc.subjectAnálisis envolvente de datos
dc.subjectEficiencia relativa
dc.subjectLogística inversa
dc.subjectEmpaques retornables
dc.subjectAlmacenamiento
dc.titleData Envelopment Analysis to measure relative performance based on key indicators from a supply network with reverse logistics
dc.titleAnálisis Envolvente de Datos (DEA) para medir el desempeño relativo basado en indicadores de una red de abastecimiento con Logística Inversa
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución