Diseño de un modelo de simulación genérico de la logística directa e inversa del plástico pet enfocado a la mitigación de impactos negativos en los minoristas
| dc.contributor | Obredor Baldovino, Thalia | |
| dc.contributor | Borrero López, Luz | |
| dc.creator | Conde Sánchez, Stefany | |
| dc.date | 2018-11-03T19:08:25Z | |
| dc.date | 2018-11-03T19:08:25Z | |
| dc.date | 2017-02-06 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-03T20:06:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-10-03T20:06:37Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11323/352 | |
| dc.identifier | Corporación Universidad de la Costa | |
| dc.identifier | REDICUC - Repositorio CUC | |
| dc.identifier | https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9174256 | |
| dc.description | Existe una creciente preocupación mundial por el impacto ambiental que están generando los desechos provenientes de los bienes de consumo masivo como lo son los envases PET. Se han realizado varios estudios al respecto entre los cuales se encuentran los sistemas de depósito reembolsable como alternativas de solución recomendadas por varios autores; sin embargo no han tenido gran acogida en muchos países, esto puede atribuirse a los perjuicios que estos ocasionan en los minoristas. Esta investigación propone un modelo de simulación de la logística directa e inversa de plástico PET enfocado a la mitigación de impactos negativos en los minoristas el cual está basado en el artículo científico “Economic analysis of deposit–refund systems with measures for mitigating negative impacts on suppliers” (Numata D., 2009). La caracterización del modelo se hace teniendo en cuenta los estudios realizados previamente y se modela utilizando el software de simulación ARENA. Se utilizan diferentes indicadores de medición para analizar el desempeño de la cadena de suministros bajo dicho modelo y posteriormente se definen y modelan varios escenarios alternativos para realizar un análisis comparativo y determinar cuáles serían las condiciones más favorables para los minoristas ante la implantación de un sistema de depósito reembolsable. Finalmente se obtiene que la adopción de políticas de mitigación de impactos negativos en los sistemas de depósitos reembolsables es un gran incentivo para los minoristas puesto que los beneficios económicos son significativos incluso bajo diferentes escenarios y facilitan el flujo del canal inverso en su punto más crítico que es la recolección. | |
| dc.description | There is an increasing global concern about the environmental impact that wastes from mass consumer goods like PET containers are generating.Several studies have been carried out including deposit-refund systems as alternatives of solution recommended by several authors; although they have not been well received in many countries, this can be attributed to the damages caused by them on retailers. This study proposes a simulation model of direct and reverse logistic of PET plastic focussed to mitigation of negative impacts on retailers which is based on scientific article “Economic analysis of deposit–refund systems with measures for mitigating negative impacts on suppliers” (Numata D., 2009). The model characterization is made taking into account the previous studies and is modeled using the simulation software ARENA. Different measurement indicators are used to analyze the performance of supply chain under such model and then several alternative scenarios are defined and modeled to make a comparative analysis and determine what woul be the most favorable conditions to retailers under the implementation of a deposit-refund system. The results show that adoption of negative impacts mitigation policies on deposit-refund systems is a great incentive to the retailers since the economic benefits are significative even under different scenarios and make easier the flow of reverse logistic in its more critical fase that is recolection. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Corporación Universidad de la Costa | |
| dc.publisher | Ingeniería Industrial | |
| dc.relation | Abdulrahman, M.D., Gunasekaran, A., & Subramanian, N. (2014). Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors. Int. J. Production Economics, 147, 460–471. Avella Guzmán, O.R. (2005). Empaques, envases y embalajes: una propuesta normativa. Tecnogestión, 11(1), 41-50. Cardoso, S.R., Barbosa-Póvoa, A.P.F.D., & Relvas S. (2013). Design and planning of supply chains with integration of reverse logistics activities under demand uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 226, 436–451. Coelho, T.M., Castro, R., & Gobbo, J.A. (2011). PET containers in Brazil: Opportunities and challenges of a logistics model for post-consumer waste recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55, 291–299. Dace, E. Pakere, I., & Blumberga, D. (2013). Evaluation of economic aspects of the depositrefund system for packaging in Latvia. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 24(3), 311 – 329. Diaz, A., Alvarez, M.J., y González, P. (2004). La logística inversa. In Mc Graw Hill (Eds.), Logística Inversa y Medio Ambiente (pp 43-67). Madrid, España: Mc Graw Hill. González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, O. (2006). The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices. International Journal of Production Research, 44(7), 1353–1373. Jayant, A., Gupta, P., & Garg, S.K. (2014). Simulation Modelling and Analysis of Network Design for Closed-Loop Supply Chain: A Case Study of Battery Industry. Procedia Engineering, 97, 2213 – 2221. Kara, S., Rugrungruang, F., & Kaebernick, H. (2007). Simulation modelling of reverse logistics networks. Int. J. Production Economics, 106, 61–69. Kinobe, J.R., Gebresenbet, G., Niwagaba, C.B., & Vinneras, B. (2015). Reverse logistics system and recycling potential at a landfill: A case study from Kampala City. Waste Management, 42, 82–92. Kulshreshtha, P., & Sarangi, S. (2001). No return, no refund: an analysis of deposit-refund systems. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46, 379–394. Lavee, D. (2010). A cost-benefit analysis of a deposit–refund program for beverage containers in Israel. Waste Management, 30, 338–345. Matar Mohamad, N., & Cory Searcy, C. (2014). A reverse logistics inventory model for plastic bottles. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 25(2), 315 – 333. Mejía Tovar, E.Y. (2005). Estudio para el montaje de un supermercado especializado en ventas de productos de consumo masivo, en la ciudadela El Recreo (tesis de pregrado). Universidad de la Salle, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. Numata, D. (2009). Economic analysis of deposit–refund systems with measures for mitigating negative impacts on suppliers. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53, 199–207. Numata, D. (2010). On illegal activities in the California state beverage container deposit system. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag, 12, 314–320. Parish, D. (2009). The 1973 – 1975 Energy Crisis and Its Impact on Transport. Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring, (09/107). Recuperado desde: http://www.racfoundation.org/assets/rac_foundation/content/downloadables/energy%20cr isis%20-%20parish%20-%20161009%20-%20report.pdf Quoc Dat, L., Truc Linh, D.T., Chou, S., & Yu, V.F. (2012). Optimizing reverse logistic costs for recycling end-of-life electrical and electronic products. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 6380–6387. Ramezani, M., Bashiri, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2013). A new multi-objective stochastic model for a forward/reverse logistic network design with responsiveness and quality level. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 328–344. Ripa, J. (2016, agosto 11). ¿Qué se degrada antes, un chicle o una colilla?. Madrid, España: El país – Espacio Eco. Recuperado de: http://economia.elpais.com/economia/2016/08/02/actualidad/1470137688_788306.html. Shih, L. (2001). Reverse logistics system planning for recycling electrical appliances and computers in Taiwan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 32, 55–72. Simon, B., Ben Amor, M., & Foldényi, R. (2016). Life cycle impact assessment of beverage packaging systems: focus on the collection of post-consumer bottles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 238-248. Villareal, A. (2016, diciembre 13). Suecia recicla tanto que se ha quedado sin basura. Madrid, España: El Español. Recuperado de: http://www.elespanol.com/ciencia/ecologia/20161212/177732604_0.html. Wojanowski, R., Verter, V., & Boyaci, T. (2007). Retail–collection network design under deposit–refund. Computers & Operations Research, 34, 324–345. | |
| dc.rights | Atribución – No comercial – Compartir igual | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.subject | Logística inversa | |
| dc.subject | Cadena de suministros | |
| dc.subject | Simulación | |
| dc.subject | Plástico PET | |
| dc.subject | PET plastic | |
| dc.subject | Simulation | |
| dc.subject | Supply chain | |
| dc.subject | Reverse logistics | |
| dc.title | Diseño de un modelo de simulación genérico de la logística directa e inversa del plástico pet enfocado a la mitigación de impactos negativos en los minoristas | |
| dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Pregrado | |
| dc.type | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f | |
| dc.type | Text | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TP | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | |
| dc.type | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa |