Efecto de la impregnación con boro sobre la densidad y módulo dinámico de tres maderas angiospermas

Effect of boron impregnation on the density and dynamic modulus of three angiosperm woods

dc.creatorAvila-Calderón, Luz-Elena-Alfonsina
dc.creatorSotomayor-Castellanos, Javier-Ramón
dc.date2023-04-11T15:55:08Z
dc.date2023-04-11T15:55:08Z
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T20:06:33Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T20:06:33Z
dc.identifierL. Ávila-Calderón y J. Sotomayor-Castellanos, “Efecto de la impregnación con boro sobre la densidad y módulo dinámico de tres maderas angiospermas” INGECUC, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–12. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.18.2.2022.01
dc.identifier2382-4700
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/9982
dc.identifier10.17981/ingecuc.18.2.2022.01
dc.identifier0122-6517
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifierREDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9174244
dc.descriptionIntroducción— La madera es un material biodegradable y su empleo requiere información sobre el efecto de substancias protectoras en sus propiedades mecánicas. De tal forma que es importante desarrollar tecnología para su conservación cuando está en servicio. Objetivo— Impregnar con sales de boro, empleando el método de baño caliente-frío, probetas normalizadas de Fraxinus americana, Albizia plurijuga y Spathodea campanulata. Metodología— Se determinó la retención de sales de boro, densidad, velocidad de onda y módulo dinámico de la madera. Se realizaron pruebas de ondas de esfuerzo antes y después del tratamiento de impregnación.del estudio. Resultados— La retención aumenta a medida que la concentración se incrementa y disminuye a medida que la densidad de la madera aumenta. No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las muestras de las densidades y las velocidades de onda de cada especie. Para los módulos de elasticidad de S. campanulata no se encontraron diferencias. Para F. americana y A. plurijuga sí se identificaron diferencias. Conclusiones— Los resultados sugieren que la capacidad de retención de sales de boro de la madera depende, principalmente, de la especie. Los valores promedio de la retención de sales de boro para las concentraciones de 3% fueron mayores que el límite inferior tóxico de retención para satisfacer los requerimientos mínimos de las normas para madera utilizada en espacios interiores. Para fines de diseño y cálculo ingenieril, es recomendable considerar el alcance de los resultados de esta investigación que se limita a probetas de pequeñas dimensiones.
dc.descriptionIntroduction— Wood is a biodegradable material and its use requires information on the effect of protective substances on its mechanical properties. In such a way that it is important to develop technology for its conservation when it is in service. Objective— To impregnate with boron salts using the hot-cold bath process test specimens of Fraxinus americana, Albizia plurijuga and Spathodea campanulata. Methodology— Boron salt retention, density, wave velocity and dynamic modulus of the wood were determined. Stress wave tests were performed before and after the impregnation treatment. Results— The retention increases as the concentration increases and decreases as the density of the wood increases. No statistically significant differences were observed between the density and wave velocity samples of each species. No differences were found for the elasticity modules of S. campanulata. For F. americana and A. plurijuga differences were identified. Conclusions— The results suggest that the retention capacity of boron salts from wood depends mainly on the species. The average values of boron salt retention for concentrations of three percent were greater than the lower toxic retention limit to meet the minimum requirements of the standards for wood used indoors. For engineering design and calculation purposes, it is advisable to consider the scope of the results of this research that is limited to small-sized specimens.
dc.format12 páginas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.publisherColombia
dc.relationINGE CUC
dc.relation[1] A. Pizzi, “Wood products and green chemistry”, Ann. For. Sci., vol. 73, pp. 185–203, Mar. 2016. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0448-3
dc.relation[2] D. Sandberg, A. Kutnar & G. Mantanis, “Wood modification technologies”, Iforest, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 895–908, Dec. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2380-010
dc.relation[3] J. Winandy & J. Morrell, “Improving the utility, performance, and durability of wood- and bio-based composites”, Ann. For. Sci., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Mar. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0625-2
dc.relation[4] J. Elvira-León, J. Chimenos, C. Isábal, J. Monton, J. Formosa & L. Haurie, “Epsomite as flame retardant treatment for wood: Preliminary study”, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 126, pp. 936–942, Nov. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.107
dc.relation[5] F. Wang, J. Liu & W. Lv, “Thermal degradation and fire performance of wood treated with PMUF resin and boron compounds”, FAM, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1051–1057, Jun. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2445
dc.relation[6] G. Tondi, S. Wieland, T. Wimmer, M. Thevenon, A. Pizzi & A. Petutschnigg, “Tannin-boron preservatives for wood buildings: mechanical and fire properties”, Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 689–696, Sept. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-012-0603-1
dc.relation[7] F. Obounou-Akong, P. Gérardin, M. Thévenon & C. Gérardin-Charbonnier, “Hydrogel-based boron salt formulations for wood preservation”, Wood Sci. Technol., vol. 49, n. 3, pp. 443–456, Feb. 2015. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00226-015-0701-4
dc.relation[8] E. Baysal, E. Tomak, E. Topaloglu & E. Pesman, “Surface properties of bamboo and scots pine impregnated with boron and copper based wood preservatives after accelerated weathering”, Maderas, Cienc. tecnol., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 253–264, Apr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-221X2016005000023
dc.relation[9] S. Ahn, S. Oh, I. Choi, G. Han, H. Jeong, K. Kim, Y. Yoon & I. Yang, “Environmentally friendly wood preservatives formulated with enzymatic-hydrolyzed okara, copper and/or boron salts”, J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 178, no. 1-3, pp. 604–611, Jun. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.128
dc.relation[10] H. Simsek, E. Baysal & H. Peker, “Some mechanical properties and decay resistance of wood impregnated with environmentally-friendly borates”, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2279–2284, Nov. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.028
dc.relation[11] E. Tomak, H. Viitanen, U. Yildiz & M. Hughes, “The combined effects of boron and oil heat treatment on the properties of beech and Scots pine wood. Part 2: Water absorption, compression strength, color changes, and decay resistance”, J. Mater. Sci., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 608–615, Sept. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10853-010-4860-2
dc.relation[12] A. Can & H. Sivrikaya, “Surface characterization of wood treated with boron compounds combined with water repellents”, Color, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 462–472, Jun. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22357
dc.relation[13] B. Lesar, Ž. Gorišek & M. Humar, “Sorption properties of wood impregnated with boron compounds, sodium chloride and glucose”, Dry. Technol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 94–102, Jan. 2009. https://doi. org/10.1080/07373930802565947
dc.relation[14] B. Lesar, A. Straže & M. Humar, “Sorption properties of wood impregnated with aqueous solution of boric acid and montan wax emulsion”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 1337–1345, Nov. 2010. https:// doi.org/10.1002/app.33196
dc.relation[15] A. Temiz, E. Gezer, U. Yildiz & S. Yildiz, “Combustion properties of alder (Alnus glutinosa L.) Gaertn. subsp. barbata (C.A. Mey) Yalt.) and southern pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood treated with boron compounds”, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2165–2169, Nov. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.08.011
dc.relation[16] Ş. Yasar, M. Fidan, M. Yaşar, M. Atar & E. Alkan, “Combustion properties of impregnated spruce (Picea orientalis L.) wood”, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 143, pp. 574–579, Jul. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2017.03.141
dc.relation[17] A. Özçifçi, Y. Örs & B. Uysal, “Determination of some physical and mechanical properties of laminated veneer lumber impregnated with boron compounds”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 2218–2224, Aug. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.26217
dc.relation[18] D. Marney & L. Russell, “Combined fire retardant and wood preservative treatments for outdoor wood applications. A review of the literature”, Fire Tech., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Mar. 2008. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10694-007-0016-6
dc.relation[19] S.N. Kartal, W.J. Hwang & Y. Imamura, “Combined effect of boron compounds and heat treatments on wood properties: Chemical and strength properties of wood”, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 198, no. 1-3, pp. 234–240, Mar. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.001
dc.relation[20] D. Obanda, T. Shupe & H. Barnes, “Reducing leaching of boron-based wood preservatives. A review of research”, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 99, no. 15, pp. 7312–7322, Oct. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.077
dc.relation[21] V. Lahtela, K. Hämäläinen & T. Kärki, “The effects of preservatives on the properties of wood after modification”, Balt. For., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 189–203, Nov. 2013. Available: https://www.cabdirect.org/ cabdirect/abstract/20143327849
dc.relation[22] L. Ávila-Calderón, M. Herrera-Ferreyra y D. Raya-González, Preservación de la madera en México. MRL, MX: UMSNH, 2012.
dc.relation[23] C. Del Menezzi, M. Amorim, M. Costa & L. Garcez, “Evaluation of thermally modified wood by means of stress wave and ultrasound nondestructive methods”, Mat. Sci., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 61–66, Mar. 2014. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.20.1.3341
dc.relation[24] A. Freitas, J. Gonçalez y C. Del Menezzi, “Tratamento termomecânico e seus efeitos nas propriedades da Simarouba amara (Aubl.)”, Floresta e Ambient., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 565–572, Dec. 2016. https://doi. org/10.1590/2179-8087.144115
dc.relation[25] L. Shan-qing & F. Feng, “Comparative study on three dynamic modulus of elasticity and static modulus of elasticity for Lodgepole pine lumber”, J. For. Res., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 309–312, Dec. 2007. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11676-007-0062-4
dc.relation[26] U. Dackermann, K. Crews, B. Kasal, J. Li, M. Riggio, F. Rinn & T. Tannert, “In situ assessment of structural timber using stress-wave measurements”, Mater. Struct., vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 787–803, May. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0095-4
dc.relation[27] M. Yamasaki, C. Tsuzuki, Y. Sasaki & Y. Onishi, “Influence of moisture content on estimating Young’s modulus of full-scale timber using stress wave velocity”, J. Wood Sci., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 225–235, Mar. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-017-1624-5
dc.relation[28] Y. Yu, Y. Liu, M. Gong, Z. Xu & Y. Fang, “R&R study of using a stress wave timer to measure the elastic modulus of structural dimension lumber” Meas., vol. 95, pp. 293–296, Jan. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. measurement.2016.10.040
dc.relation[29] V. Nasir, S. Nourian, S. Avramidis & J. Cool, “Stress wave evaluation by accelerometer and acoustic emission sensor for thermally modified wood classification using three types of neural networks”, Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 45–55, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-018-1373-1
dc.relation[30] J. Sotomayor-Castellanos y S. Correa-Jurado, “Retención de sales de boro en la madera y su efecto en el módulo de elasticidad dinámico”, Rev. Científ., vol. 1, no. 24, pp. 90–99, Jun. 2014. https://doi. org/10.14483/10.14483/udistrital.jour.RC.2016.24.a9
dc.relation[31] Wood - Sampling methods and general requirements for physical and mechanical testing of small clear wood specimens, ISO 3129:2019, International Organization for Standardization-ISO, GE, CH, 2019. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/74839.html
dc.relation[32] Physical and mechanical properties of wood. Test methods for small clear wood specimens. Part 1: Wood. Determination of moisture content for physical and mechanical tests, ISO 13061-1:2014, International Organization for Standardization-ISO, GE, CH, 2014. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/60063. html
dc.relation[33] Wood - Physical and mechanical properties of wood. Test methods for small clear wood specimens. Part 2: Determination of density for physical and mechanical tests, ISO 13061-2:2014, International Organization for Standardization-ISO, GE, CH, 2014. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/60064.html
dc.relation[34] Industria de la construcción - Preservadores para madera - Clasificación y requisitos, NMX-C-178-ONNCCE-2014, Organismo Nacional de Normalización y Certificación de la Construcción y EdificaciónONNCCE, CDMX, MX, 2014.
dc.relation[35] H. Simsek, E. Baysal, M. Yilmaz & F. Culha, “Some mechanical properties of wood impregnated with environmentally-friendly boron and copper based chemicals”, Wood Res., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 495–504, Sept. 2013. Available: http://www.woodresearch.sk/wr/201303/16.pdf
dc.relation[36] Use category system: User specification for treated wood, AWPA U1-19, American Wood Protection Association-AWPA, BIRM, AL, USA, 2019. https://awpa.com/
dc.relation[37] Industria de la construcción - Madera preservada a presión - Clasificación y requisitos, NMX-C-322-ONNCCE-2014, Organismo Nacional de Normalización y Certificación de la Construcción y EdificaciónONNCCE, CDMX, MX, 2014
dc.relation[38] A. Berrocal, F. Muñoz, y G. González, “Ensayo de penetrabilidad de dos preservantes a base de boro en madera de melina (Gmelina arborea) crecida en Costa Rica”, RFMK, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–12, Feb. 2004. Disponible en https://revistas.tec.ac.cr/index.php/kuru/article/view/559/485
dc.relation[39] T. Dhamodaran & R. Gnanaharan, “Boron impregnation treatment of Eucalyptus grandis wood”, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 98, no. 11, pp. 2240–2242, Aug. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.08.012
dc.relation[40] S. Salman, A. Pétrissans, M. Thévenon, S. Dumarçay, D. Perrin, B. Pollier & P. Gérardin, “Development of new wood treatments combining boron impregnation and thermo modification: Effect of additives on boron leachability”, Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 355–365, Feb. 2014. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00107-014-0787-7
dc.relation[41] J. Sotomayor y J. Villaseñor, “Retención de sales de boro en tres maderas mexicanas. Evaluación mecánica por vibraciones”, Rev. Fac. Cienc. Tecnol., vol. 26, no. supl. 1, pp. 40–46, Dic. 2016. Disponible en https://www.fceqyn.unam.edu.ar/recyt/index.php/recyt/article/view/745
dc.relation[42] J. Tamarit y J. López, Xilotecnología de los principales árboles tropicales de México. PU, MX: INIFAP, 2007.
dc.relation[43] H. Ritcher, J. Silva y R. Rodriguez, Fichas de propiedades tecnológicas y usos de maderas nativas de México e importadas. GUAD, MX: CONAFOR, 2010.
dc.relation[44] J. Sotomayor, Banco FITECMA de características físico-mecánicas de maderas mexicanas. MRL, MX: UMSNH, 2015.
dc.relation[45] J. Sotomayor y M. Ramírez, “Densidad y características higroscópicas de maderas mexicanas. Base de datos y criterios de clasificación”, IIM, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–30, Dic. 2013. Recuperado de https://laboratoriodemecanicadelamadera.weebly.com/uploads/2/7/6/9/27690625/investigacin_e_ingeniera_de_la_madera_2013_vol._9_no._3.pdf
dc.relation[46] J. Sotomayor, “Módulos de elasticidad e índices de calidad de maderas mexicanas. Síntesis de datos del Laboratorio de Mecánica de la Madera”, IIM, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–64, Abr. 2019. Disponible en https:// laboratoriodemecanicadelamadera.weebly.com/revistas.html
dc.relation[47] J. Sotomayor, M. Giraldo, J. Gené, E. Correal y M. Vilches, “Efecto de sales de boro en la densidad y en el módulo de elasticidad de tres maderas mexicanas”, Ingeniería, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 31–44, Sept. 2018. https://doi.org/10.15517/ri.v28i2.31608
dc.relation[48] GBIF Secretariat, “Fraxinus americana L.,” (2021). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist dataset. https:// doi.org/10.15468/39omei
dc.relation[49] GBIF Secretariat, “Albizia plurijuga (Standl.) Britton & Rose,” (2021). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist dataset. https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei
dc.relation[50] GBIF Secretariat, “Spathodea campanulata (P. Beauv),” (2021). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist dataset. https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei
dc.relation12
dc.relation1
dc.relation2
dc.relation18
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 INGE CUC
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcehttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/view/3554
dc.subjectTecnología de la madera
dc.subjectBaño caliente-frío
dc.subjectSpathodea campanulata
dc.subjectFraxinus americana
dc.subjectAlbizia plurijug
dc.subjectWood technology
dc.subjectHot-cold bath
dc.titleEfecto de la impregnación con boro sobre la densidad y módulo dinámico de tres maderas angiospermas
dc.titleEffect of boron impregnation on the density and dynamic modulus of three angiosperm woods
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución