Seizure of property: counteraction to the investigation of crimes and the execution of a sentence

Incautación de bienes: oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia

dc.creatorAleksandrovich Ivanov, Dmitriy
dc.creatorValerievna Tishutina, Inna
dc.creatorLvovna Dyablova, Yulia
dc.creatorValerievna Artemova, Valeriia
dc.creatorAlexandrovich Khmelev, Sergey
dc.date2023-05-25T14:39:11Z
dc.date2023-05-25T14:39:11Z
dc.date2022-01-15
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T20:02:07Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T20:02:07Z
dc.identifierIvanov, D., Tishutina, I., Dyablova, Y., Artemova, V. & Khmelev, S. (2022). Seizure of property: Counteraction to the investigation of crimes and the execution of a sentence. Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 199–216. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.09
dc.identifier1692-3030
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/10184
dc.identifier10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.09
dc.identifier2389-7716
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifierREDICUC - Repositorio - CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9174036
dc.descriptionThe authors study the procedural, organizational, and tactical issues related to the seizure of property in order to overcome the counteraction to the investigation and execution of the sentence. The relevance of this article is confirmed by the fact that in recent decades, the system of forms and methods of such counteraction on behalf of suspects, accused, and other persons tends to expand, and any gap in the procedural regulation or organizational and tactical support for the investigation of crimes is used for criminal purposes. Moreover, the authors, considering the seizure of property as a means of overcoming the opposition to the investigation and execution of the sentence, offer recommendations aimed at minimizing it. The article states that the actual basis for the seizure of property is a set of evidence indicating that a crime has caused determined harm, or that a suspect or accused has committed an act that provides for the possibility of applying property penalties. Based on the results obtained, the authors conclude that the seizure of property has a preventive and interim nature, which is suppressing the intent of the suspect (accused) aimed at concealing, selling, or other illegally alienating property, money, securities, and other valuables in order to avoid the seizure of these objects.
dc.descriptionLos autores estudian las cuestiones procesales, organizativas y tácticas relacionadas con la incautación de bienes para superar la oposición a la investigación y la ejecución de la sentencia. La relevancia de este artículo se confirma por el hecho de que en las últimas décadas, el sistema de formas y métodos de dicha oposición a favor de los sospechosos, acusados y otras personas tiende a expandirse, y cualquier laguna en la regulación procesal o en el apoyo organizativo y táctico para la investigación de los delitos se utiliza con fines delictivos. Además, los autores, considerando la incautación de bienes como un medio para superar la oposición a la investigación y ejecución de la sentencia, ofrecen recomendaciones destinadas a minimizarla. El artículo afirma que el fundamento de la incautación de bienes implica un conjunto de pruebas conducentes a indicar que un delito ha causado un daño determinado, o que un sospechoso o acusado ha cometido un acto que prevé la posibilidad de aplicación de sanciones patrimoniales. A partir de los resultados obtenidos, los autores concluyen que la incautación de bienes tiene un carácter preventivo y cautelar, que consiste en suprimir la intención del sospechoso (acusado) dirigida a ocultar, vender o enajenar ilegalmente bienes, dinero, valores y otros objetos de valor con el fin de evitar la incautación de estos objetos.
dc.format18 Páginas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.publisherColombia
dc.relationJurídicas CUC
dc.relationArshba, G. V. (2004). Seizure of property: Training manual. [Dissertation]. Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Moscow. Available: https://lawtheses.com/nalozhenie-aresta-na-imuschestvo-v-ugolovnom-sudoproizvodstve
dc.relationBasedeo, V. (2009). The Constitutional Validity of Search and Seizure Powers in South African Criminal Procedure. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 12(4), 306–331.https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i4a2747
dc.relationBuldakova, V. K. (2015). The role of the investigator (interrogator) in ensuring compensation for harm caused by the crime. Bulletin of the Tyumen Institute for Advanced Studies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 1(4), 79–85. Available from https://mvd.ru/upload/site151/doc/arhiv/Vestnik_TIPK_MVD14_2015.pdf
dc.relationBjörn, G. [Ed.] (2012). Criminal Procedure Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. 2 ed. Moscow: Prospect. Ionov, V. A. (2010). Seizure of property in the course of preliminary investigation in criminal cases of economic crimes. [Thesis degree]. Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Novgorod, Russia. Available: https://www.iuaj.net/node/385
dc.relationIvanov, A. N. & Lapin, E. S. (2007). Seizure of property in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Yurlitinform.
dc.relationKelly, B. D. (2015). Further Results Concerning the Effects of Asset Forfeiture on Policing. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2647629
dc.relationKochan, D. J. (1998). Reforming Property Forfeiture Laws to Protect Citizens’ Rights: Why and How to Curtail Abuses of Laws that Permit Private Property Seizures. [Research Paper No. 08-04]. Orange: Mackinac Center for Public Policy Report/Chapman University Law. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=928737
dc.relationKokoreva, L. V. & Lavrova, O. N. (2016). Seizure of property. The procedure for assessing the property located in the home of the suspect, the accused, immediately at the time of the investigative action: guidelines. Staroteryaevo: Moscow Regional Branch of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V.Ya.
dc.relationKovriga, Z. F. & Lyutikov, N. E. (1975). Criminal procedural compulsion. Voronezh: Voronezh State University
dc.relationNguyen, V. T., Pushkarev, V. V., Tokareva, E. V., Makeev, A. V. & Shepeleva, O. R. (2021). Compensation for Damage Caused by a Crime in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the Russian Federation. Jurnal Cita Hukum-Indonesian Law Journal, 9(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i2.21738
dc.relationPushkarev, V. V., Artemova, V. V., Ermakov, S. V., Alimamedov, E. N. & Popenkov, A. V. (2020). Criminal prosecution of persons, who committed criminal, acts using the сryptocurrency in the Russian Federation. Revista San Gregorio, 42, 330– 335. Available: https://revista.sangregorio.edu.ec/index.php/REVISTASANGREGORIO/article/view/1566
dc.relationPushkarev, V. V., Poselskaya, L. N., Skachko, A. V., Tarasov, A. V. & Mutalieva, L. S. (2021). Criminal Prosecution of Persons Who Have Committed Crimes in The Banking Sector. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(69), 395–406. https://doi. org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.25
dc.relationPustovaya, I. N. (2012). Seizure of property as a means of securing a civil claim. Socium and Power, 6(38), 72–76. Available from http://siv74.ru/images/downloads/arhiv-nomerov/2012/6_2012.pdf
dc.relationRepublic of Azerbaijan. (July 14, 2000). Code of Criminal Procedure of the Azerbaijan Republic. [Law No. 907-IQ]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/43/Azerbaijan/show
dc.relationRepublic of Kazakhstan. (July 4, 2014). Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. [Law No. 231-V]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/21/Italy/show
dc.relationR. F. State Duma. (November 22, 2001). The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. [УПК РФ]. No. 174-FZ. Available: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901802257
dc.relationR. F. State Duma. (June 13, 1996). The Criminal Code of The Russian Federation. [УК РФ]. No. 63-FZ. Available: https:// docs.cntd.ru/document/9017477
dc.relationR.F. Ministry of Internal Affairs. Department of Internal Affairs for Central Administrative District. Investigation Department. (2018). Materials of the criminal. [Case No.267912].
dc.relationR.F. Ministry of Internal Affairs. Department of Internal Affairs for Central Administrative District. Investigation Department. (2017). Materials of the criminal. [Case No.362927].
dc.relationR. F. Ministry of Internal Affairs. Department of Internal Affairs for Central Administrative District. Investigation Department. (2014). Materials of the criminal. [Case No.749254].
dc.relationTutynin, I. B. (2005). Seizure of property as a measure of criminal procedural compulsion. [Dissertation thesis]. Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. Available: https://www.dissercat.com/content/nalozhenie-aresta-na-imushchestvokak-mera-ugolovno-protsessualnogo-prinuzhdeniya
dc.relationVdovtsev, P. V. & Karkoshko, Yu. S. (2015). Seizure of property in criminal cases in the light of the positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Investigation of crimes: problems and solutions, 1(7), 69–70. Available: http://www.unity-dana.ru/magazines/rassledovanie-prestupleniy-problemy-i-puti-ikh-resheniya-sborniknauchno-prakticheskikh-trudov/
dc.relationYutkina, S. M. & Rostovshchikova, O. V. (2012). On the seizure of property as a measure of criminal procedural compulsion: history, theory, practice. Bulletin of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 4(23), 144–156. Available: http://va-mvd.ru/vestnik/ arhiv/23.pdf
dc.relation216
dc.relation199
dc.relation1
dc.relation18
dc.rights© The author; licensee Universidad de la Costa - CUC
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcehttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/3535
dc.subjectSeizure of property
dc.subjectMeasures of procedural coercion
dc.subjectCounteraction to the investigation of crimes
dc.subjectCounteraction to the execution of a sentence
dc.subjectIncautación de bienes
dc.subjectMedidas de coerción procesal
dc.subjectOposición a la investigación de delitos
dc.subjectOposición a la ejecución de la sentencia
dc.titleSeizure of property: counteraction to the investigation of crimes and the execution of a sentence
dc.titleIncautación de bienes: oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución