Innovation activities and their impact on product innovation results: evidence from a sectorial study

dc.creatorChang muñoz, eduardo
dc.creatorGuarin Garcia, Andres Felipe
dc.creatorCharris Sevilla, Yuneidis
dc.creatorGallego-Nicholls, José Fernando
dc.creatorSantos-Rojo, Cristina
dc.creatorOrtigosa-Blanch, Arturo
dc.date2023-06-01T22:21:58Z
dc.date2023-06-01T22:21:58Z
dc.date2023
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T19:51:47Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T19:51:47Z
dc.identifierChang-Muñoz, E.A.; Guarín-García, A.F.; Charris-Sevilla, Y.; Gallego-Nicholls, J.F.; Santos-Rojo, C.; Ortigosa-Blanch, A. Innovation Activities and Their Impact on Product Innovation Results: Evidence from a Sectorial Study. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6459. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086459
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/10217
dc.identifier10.3390/su15086459
dc.identifier2071-1050
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifierREDICUC – Repositorio CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9172754
dc.descriptionIn the current competitive context, innovation has become a necessity, to the point that it seems that no company can survive without developing innovation processes. One of the great concerns of small and medium-sized companies is about the investment of resources in innovation activities and their success. Therefore, this article analyzes the influence of different innovation activities performed by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) of the Colombian Caribbean region on their product innovation outcomes and thereby provides a solid groundwork for the design of innovation strategies. To achieve this objective, a data collection instrument was first validated in 56 SMEs, followed by the application of a reflective measurement model with convergent validity analysis. The results of the model application revealed that investment in Research and Development (R&D) and innovation, knowledge transfer, technology adoption, and financial aspects explain to a greater extent the introduction of new products to the market.
dc.format15 páginas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.publisherSwitzerland
dc.relationSustainability
dc.relation1. Bagheri, M.; Mitchelmore, S.; Bamiatzi, V.; Nikolopoulos, K. Internationalization Orientation in SMEs: The Mediating Role of Technological Innovation. J. Int. Manag. 2019, 25, 121–139. [CrossRef]
dc.relation2. Ortiz, J.; Fumás, V.S. Technological innovation and the demand for labor by firms in expansion and recession. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 2020, 29, 417–440. [CrossRef]
dc.relation3. Centro de Estudios Económicos ANIF, Comentario Económico del Día. Available online: www.anif.com.co (accessed on 27 October 2022).
dc.relation4. Castillo-Vergara, M.; García-Pérez-De-Lema, D. Product innovation and performance in SME’s: The role of the creative process and risk taking. Innovation 2021, 23, 470–488. [CrossRef]
dc.relation5. Hervas-Oliver, J.L.; Sempere-Ripoll, F.; Boronat-Moll, C. Technological innovation typologies and open innovation in SMEs: Beyond internal and external sources of knowledge. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 162, 120338. [CrossRef]
dc.relation6. Muñoz-Pascual, L.; Galende, J.; Curado, C. Contributions to Sustainability in SMEs: Human Resources, Sustainable Product Innovation Performance and the Mediating Role of Employee Creativity. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2008. [CrossRef]
dc.relation7. Nuryakin, N.; Maryati, T. Green product competitiveness and green product success. Why and how does mediating affect green innovation performance? Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2020, 7, 3061–3077. [CrossRef]
dc.relation8. Aboal, D.; Garda, P. Technological and non-technological innovation and productivity in services vis-à-vis manufacturing sectors. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 2016, 25, 435–454. [CrossRef]
dc.relation9. Jeong, S.W.; Chung, J.-E.; Roh, J.-S. Impact of External Knowledge Inflow on Product and Process Innovation of Korean SMEs: Absorptive Capacity as a Mediator. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 2019, 37, 219–234. [CrossRef]
dc.relation10. Ukpabio, M.G.; Adeyeye, A.D.; Oluwatope, O.B. Absorptive capacity and product innovation: New evidence from Nigeria. Innov. Dev. 2016, 6, 213–233. [CrossRef]
dc.relation11. Almodóvar, P.; Nguyen, Q.T. Product innovation of domestic firms versus foreign MNE subsidiaries: The role of external knowledge sources. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 184, 122000. [CrossRef]
dc.relation12. Antunes, M.G.; Mucharreira, P.R.; Justino, M.R.T.; Texeira-Quirós, J. Effects of Total Quality Management (TQM) Dimensions on Innovation—Evidence from SMEs. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10095. [CrossRef]
dc.relation13. Rosli, M.; Syamsuriana, S. The Impact of Innovation on the Performance of Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises. J. Innov. Manag. Small Medium Enterp. 2013, 2, 885666.
dc.relation14. Azadehdel, M.R.; Farahbod, F.; Jamshidinejad, M.A. The impact of knowledge sharing on innovation and performance. Int. J. Sci. Manag. Dev. 2013, 3, 48–53.
dc.relation15. Abbasi, D.; Ashrafi, M.; Ghodsypour, S.H. A multi objective-BSC model for new product development project portfolio selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 2020, 162, 113757. [CrossRef]
dc.relation16. Lin, Y.-S.; Chen, M. Implementing TRIZ with Supply Chain Management in New Product Development for Small and Medium Enterprises. Processes 2021, 9, 614. [CrossRef]
dc.relation17. Crossan, M.M.; Apaydin, M. A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Manag. Stud. 2010, 47, 1154–1191. [CrossRef]
dc.relation18. Foss, N.J.; Saebi, T. Business models and business model innovation: Between wicked and paradigmatic problems. Long Range Plan. 2018, 51, 9–21. [CrossRef]
dc.relation19. Prajogo, D.I. The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 171, 241–249. [CrossRef]
dc.relation20. Orellano, M.; Lambey-Checchin, C.; Medini, K.; Neubert, G. A Methodological Framework to Support the Sustainable Innovation Development Process: A Collaborative Approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9054. [CrossRef]
dc.relation21. Morales, P.; Flikkema, M.; Castaldi, C.; Man, A.-P.D. The effectiveness of appropriation mechanisms for sustainable innovations from small and medium-sized enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 374, 133921. [CrossRef]
dc.relation22. Oyewo, B.; Moses, O.; Erin, O. Balanced scorecard usage and organizational effectiveness: Evidence from manufacturing sector. Meas. Bus. Excell. 2022, 26, 558–582. [CrossRef]
dc.relation23. Mondal, S.; Roy, S.; Modak, N. Statistical Analysis of New Product Strategy Determinants for NPD Success. In Advances in Simulation, Product Design and Development; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 191–201.
dc.relation24. Azevedo, M.; Lobo, C.A.; Pereira, C.S.; Durão, N.; Maldonado, I. A Possible Relationship between Internationalization and Innovation Strategies: An Analysis of Portuguese SMEs. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2021, 23, 74–90. [CrossRef]
dc.relation25. Allen, G.J. Concepturealize™: A new contribution to generate real-needs-focussed, user-centred, lean business models. J. Innov. Entrep. 2022, 11, 6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
dc.relation26. Ali, J.; Reed, M.R.; Saghaian, S.H. Determinants of product innovation in food and agribusiness small and medium enterprises: Evidence from enterprise survey data of India. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2021, 24, 777–796. [CrossRef]
dc.relation27. Agustia, D.; Haryanto, S.D.; Permatasari, Y.; Midiantari, P.N. Product innovation, firm performance and moderating role of technology capabilities. Asian J. Account. Res. 2022, 7, 252–265. [CrossRef]
dc.relation28. Zapata-Roldan, F.; Sheikh, N.J. A Design Management Agent-Based Model for New Product Development. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2022, 69, 2026–2038. [CrossRef]
dc.relation29. Sergeevna, B.L. Special Aspects of Innovative Product Development by Knowledge-Intensive Businesses in the Current Economic Conditions. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2019, 8, 2053–2055. [CrossRef]
dc.relation30. Annunen, P.; Mustonen, E.; Harkonen, J.; Haapasalo, H. Sales capability creation during new product development—Early involvement of sales. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2021, 36, 263–273. [CrossRef]
dc.relation31. Lee, A.H.I.; Lin, C.Y. An integrated fuzzy QFD framework for new product development. Flex. Serv. Manuf. J. 2011, 23, 26–47. [CrossRef]
dc.relation32. Yin, S.; Li, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, M. How to Improve the Quality and Speed of Green New Product Development? Processes 2019, 7, 443. [CrossRef]
dc.relation33. Cooper, R.G.; Edgett, S.J.; Kleinschmidt, E.J. Portfolio management for new product development: Results of an industry practices study. R&D Manag. 2001, 31, 361–380. [CrossRef]
dc.relation34. Chen, W.-C.; Lin, P.-W.; Deng, W.-J. An Integrated Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model for New Product Development: The Case of Taiwan Organic Light-Emitting Diode Industry. Processes 2022, 10, 1205. [CrossRef]
dc.relation35. Jusufi, G.; Ukaj, F.; Ajdarpaši´c, S. The effect of product innovation on the export performance of Kosovo SMEs. Management 2020, 25, 215–234. [CrossRef]
dc.relation36. Doan, A.-T.; Khan, A.; Holmes, S.; Tran, T. SMEs’ efficiency in a transitional economy: Does innovation and public support schemes matter? J. Asia Pac. Econ. 2021. [CrossRef]
dc.relation37. Velazquez-Cazares, M.G.; Gil-Lafuente, A.M.; Leon-Castro, E.; Blanco-Mesa, F. Innovation capabilities measurement using fuzzy methodologies: A Colombian SMEs case. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 2021, 27, 384–413. [CrossRef]
dc.relation38. Molodchik, M.; Jardon, C.; Yachmeneva, E. Multilevel analysis of knowledge sources for product innovation in Russian SMEs. Eurasian Bus. Rev. 2021, 11, 247–266. [CrossRef]
dc.relation39. Haryati, R.; University, E.; Yasri, Y. Development of small, micro enterprises based (SMEs) on innovation and environmental sustainable development in West Sumatera. Int. J. Entrep. 2021, 25, 1–13.
dc.relation40. Cosenz, F.; Bivona, E. Fostering growth patterns of SMEs through business model innovation. A tailored dynamic business modelling approach. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 130, 658–669. [CrossRef]
dc.relation41. Adnani, L.; Jusuf, E.; Alamsyah, K.; Jamaludin, M. The role of innovation and information sharing in supply chain management and business performance of halal products in tourism destinations. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2023, 11, 195–202. [CrossRef]
dc.relation42. Di Cintio, M.; Ghosh, S.; Grassi, E. Direct or indirect exports: What matters for firms’ innovation activities? Appl. Econ. Lett. 2020, 27, 93–103. [CrossRef]
dc.relation43. Kava, L.; Didonet, S.R. The influence of market orientation on exploration and exploitation innovation strategies and organizational performance. Rev. Bras. Mark. 2019, 18, 1–16. [CrossRef]
dc.relation44. Dawid, H.; Keoula, M.Y.; Kopel, M.; Kort, P.M. Dynamic investment strategies and leadership in product innovation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2023, 306, 431–447. [CrossRef]
dc.relation45. Odei, S.A.; Appiah, M.K. Unravelling the drivers of technological innovations in the Czech Republic: Do international technological linkages matter? Int. J. Innov. Stud. 2023, 7, 32–46. [CrossRef]
dc.relation46. OECD. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. In Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2015. [CrossRef]
dc.relation47. Sweezy, P.M. Professor Schumpeter’s Theory of Innovation. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1943, 25, 93–96. [CrossRef]
dc.relation48. OECD; Eurostat. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. In Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th ed.; OECD Publishing: Paris, France; Eurostat: Luxemburg, 2018.
dc.relation49. Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [CrossRef]
dc.relation50. Jöreskog, K.G.; Sörbom, D. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language; Scientific Software International: Lincolnwood, IL, USA, 1993.
dc.relation51. Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Cheah, J.-H.; Ting, H.; Moisescu, O.I.; Radomir, L. Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tour. Econ. 2019, 26, 531–554. [CrossRef]
dc.relation52. Sharma, P.N.; Shmueli, G.; Sarstedt, M.; Danks, N.; Ray, S. Prediction-Oriented Model Selection in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Decis. Sci. 2019, 52, 567–607. [CrossRef]
dc.relation53. Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Hair, J.F. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In Handbook of Market Research; Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Vomberg, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–40. [CrossRef]
dc.relation54. Hair, J.F., Jr.; Matthews, L.M.; Matthews, R.L.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal. 2017, 1, 107. [CrossRef]
dc.relation55. Henseler, J.; Hubona, G.; Ray, P.A. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 2–20. [CrossRef]
dc.relation56. Hair, J.F., Jr.; Babin, B.J.; Krey, N. Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and Recommendations. J. Advert. 2017, 46, 163–177. [CrossRef]
dc.relation57. Arbeláez, A.M.; Parra Torrado, M. Innovation, R&D Investment and Productivity in Colombia; Fedesarrollo: Bogotá, Colombia, 2009.
dc.relation58. Rocha, L.A.; Lima, P.V.P.S.; Khan, A.S.; De Sousa, E.P. R&D spillovers, innovation and market value: Evidence of absorptive capacity in the generation of clean technologies. Estud. Econ. Apl. 2019, 2, 1–14.
dc.relation59. Zhao, H.-H.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Guo, X.-G.; Gui, H.-J. Chinese Provincial Difference in the Efficiency of Universities’ Scientific and Technological Activities Based on DEA with Shared Input. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 2022, 8319498. [CrossRef]
dc.relation60. Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed.; Cengage Learning EMEA: Andover, UK, 2018. Available online: https://www.amazon.com/Multivariate-Analysis-William-author-Anderson-dp-1473756545/dp/14737565 45/ref=dp_ob_title_bk (accessed on 27 October 2022).
dc.relation61. Falk, R.; Miller, N. A Primer for Soft Modeling; The University of Akron Press: Akron, OH, USA, 1992.
dc.relation62. Xie, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, T. Involving online community customers in product innovation: The double-edged sword effect. Technovation 2023, 123, 102687. [CrossRef]
dc.relation63. Asociación Nacional de Instituciones Financieras. Encuesta MiPyme Anif; Asociación Nacional de Instituciones Financieras: Bogotá, Colombia, 2021.
dc.relation64. Deng, Z.; Hofman, P.S.; Newman, A. Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese private SMEs. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2013, 30, 717–734. [CrossRef]
dc.relation65. O’Sullivan, A. Interpersonal Boundary Spanning for Supplier Integration in Complex NPD. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2022, 69, 2117–2128. [CrossRef]
dc.relation66. Ohern, M.S.; Rindfleisch, A. Customer Co-Creation. In Review of Marketing Research; Malhotra, N.K., Ed.; Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.: Bingley, UK, 2010; Volume 6, pp. 84–106. [CrossRef]
dc.relation67. Venesz, B.; D˝ory, T.; Raišiene, A.G. Characteristics of Lead Users in Different Stages of the New Product Development Process: A ˙ Systematic Review in the Context of Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 24. [CrossRef]
dc.relation68. Hurley, R.F.; Hult, G.T.M. Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. J. Mark. 1998, 62, 42–54. [CrossRef]
dc.relation69. Delgado-Verde, M.; Díez-Vial, I. New product development and supplier involvement: The role of R&D collaboration with supporting organisations. J. Technol. Transf. 2023. [CrossRef]
dc.relation70. Madrid-Guijarro, A.; Martin, D.P.; García-Pérez-De-Lema, D. Capacity of open innovation activities in fostering product and process innovation in manufacturing SMEs. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2021, 15, 2137–2164. [CrossRef]
dc.relation71. Whittaker, D.H.; Fath, B.P.; Fiedler, A. Assembling capabilities for innovation: Evidence from New Zealand SMEs. Int. Small Bus. J. Res. Entrep. 2016, 34, 123–143. [CrossRef]
dc.relation72. Muñoz, E.C.; García, A.F.G.; Parejo, A.N.; Mercado-Caruso, N.; Gallego-Nicholls, J.F.; Taboada, A.P.H. Human-Computer Interaction Activities as a Basis in the Development of Innovations in Process: The Case of the Colombian Exporter SMEs. In HCI International 2022–Late Breaking Papers: HCI for Today’s Community and Economy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 131–148. [CrossRef]
dc.relation73. Mei, L.; Rentocchini, F.; Chen, J. Antecedents of strategic ambidexterity in firms’ product innovation: External knowledge and internal information sharing. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2021. [CrossRef]
dc.relation74. Tian, D.; Guo, X.; Wang, P. Innovation Vouchers and the Sustainable Growth of High-Tech SMEs: Evidence from China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11176. [CrossRef]
dc.relation75. Dima, A.; Bugheanu, A.-M.; Dinulescu, R.; Potcovaru, A.-M.; Stefanescu, C.A.; Marin, I. Exploring the Research Regarding Frugal Innovation and Business Sustainability through Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1326. [CrossRef]
dc.relation76. Chang-Muñoz, E.; Mercado-Caruso, N.; Gazabon, D.O.; Segarra-Oña, M.; Osorio, S.N. Product or process innovation? The dilemma for exporting SMEs in emerging economies: The case of the Colombian Caribbean. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 198, 620–625. [CrossRef]
dc.relation77. Alam, A.; Uddin, M.; Yazdifar, H.; Shafique, S.; Lartey, T. R&D investment, firm performance and moderating role of system and safeguard: Evidence from emerging markets. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 106, 94–105. [CrossRef]
dc.relation78. Jung, S.; Kwak, G. Firm Characteristics, Uncertainty and Research and Development (R&D) Investment: The Role of Size and Innovation Capacity. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1668. [CrossRef]
dc.relation79. Xu, J.; Sim, J.-W. Characteristics of Corporate R&D Investment in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Manufacturing Industry in China and South Korea. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3002. [CrossRef]
dc.relation80. Atuahene-Gima, K.; Wei, Y. The Vital Role of Problem-Solving Competence in New Product Success. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2011, 28, 81–98. [CrossRef]
dc.relation81. Liu, T.-C.; Chen, Y.-J. Strategy orientation, product innovativeness, and new product performance. J. Manag. Organ. 2015, 21, 2–16. [CrossRef]
dc.relation15
dc.relation1
dc.relation8
dc.relation15
dc.rights© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcehttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6459
dc.subjectProduct innovation
dc.subjectPLS-SEM
dc.subjectSmall and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
dc.subjectInnovation activities
dc.subjectCompetitive advantage
dc.titleInnovation activities and their impact on product innovation results: evidence from a sectorial study
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución