Recognizing, normalizing and articulating: an approach to highlight plural values of water ecosystem services in Colombia

dc.creatorSuarez, Andrés
dc.creatorRuiz Agudelo, Cesar Augusto
dc.creatorArias-Arévalo, Paola
dc.creatorFlorez Yepes, Gloria Yaneth
dc.creatorArciniegas, Nicolas
dc.creatorVargas-Marín, Luis A.
dc.creatorMarulanda, Alejandro
dc.creatorRamírez, Jesica
dc.creatorCastro Escobar, Edisson Stiven
dc.creatorBastidas, Juan C.
dc.creatorBlanco, David
dc.date2022-10-28T15:09:52Z
dc.date2022-10-28T15:09:52Z
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T19:49:36Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T19:49:36Z
dc.identifierAndres Suarez, Cesar Augusto Ruiz-Agudelo, Paola Arias-Arévalo, Gloria Y. Flórez-Yepes, Nicolas Arciniegas, Luis A. Vargas-Marín, Alejandro Marulanda, Jesica Ramirez, Edisson Castro-Escobar, Juan C. Bastidas, David Blanco, Recognizing, normalizing and articulating: An approach to highlight plural values of water ecosystem services in Colombia, Heliyon, Volume 8, Issue 9, 2022, e10622, ISSN 2405-8440, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10622.
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/9595
dc.identifier10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10622
dc.identifier2405-8440
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifierREDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9172392
dc.descriptionThe dialectical relationship between ecosystems and society is complex; therefore, holistic approaches are required to address this complexity. This view also stands out in the ecosystem services valuation field, where different scholars and global platforms have drawn attention to the need to incorporate plural valuation initiatives at decision-making. In this sense, through a comprehensive design, we conducted a multi-layered valuation of ecosystem services, and we highlighted multiple values in two areas of the province of Caldas, Colombia. We proposed a three-phase valuation process called Recognizing, Normalizing and Articulating values. Then, in cooperation with the regional environmental authority, we obtained different water-related ecosystem services values. Our results showed some warnings: first, we found mismatches between ecosystem services values; second, people assigned high values to ecosystems but the actual capacity of ecosystems to support ES is low. Finally, monetary values were marginal compared to social and ecological values. We conclude by saying that the more strata are assessed, the more values appear in the valuation scenarios, and those values could be conflicting. Our results have political implications, since they highlight the need to incorporate plural values as a fundamental tool for planning and land use in real scenarios where conflicts of interest and values are evident.
dc.format12 páginas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.publisherNetherlands
dc.relationHeliyon
dc.relationArias-Arévalo et al., 2018 P. Arias-Arévalo, E. Gómez-Baggethun, B. Martín-López, M. Pérez-Rincón Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: a taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods Environ. Val., 27 (1) (2018), pp. 29-53
dc.relationArias-Arévalo et al., 2017 P. Arias-Arévalo, B. Martín-López, E. Gómez-Baggethun Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems Ecol. Soc., 22 (4) (2017)
dc.relationBhaskar, 2008 R. Bhaskar A Realistic Theory of Science Routledge (2008)
dc.relationBhaskar et al., 2010 R. Bhaskar, C. Frank, K.G. Høyer, P. Næss, J. Parker Interdisciplinarity and climate change: transforming knowledge and practice for our global future Interdisciplinarity and Climate Change: Transforming Knowledge and Practice for Our Global Future (2010)
dc.relationBiggs et al., 2021 R. Biggs, A.de Vos, R. Preiser, H. Clements, K. Maciejewski, M. Schlüter The routledge handbook of research methods for social-ecological systems The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems (2021)
dc.relationBrück et al., 2022 M. Brück, D.J. Abson, J. Fischer, J. Schultner Broadening the scope of ecosystem services research: disaggregation as a powerful concept for sustainable natural resource management Ecosyst. Serv., 53 (June 2021) (2022), Article 101399
dc.relationCampagne and Roche, 2018 S.C. Campagne, P.K. Roche May the matrix be with you! Guidelines for the application of expert-based matrix approach for ecosystem services assessment and mapping One Ecosyst., 3 (2018)
dc.relationCoelho-Junior et al., 2021 M.G. Coelho-Junior, A.L. de Oliveira, E.C. da Silva-Neto, T.C. Castor-Neto, A.A.d.O. Tavares, V.M. Basso, A.P.D. Turetta, P.E. Perkins, A.G. de Carvalho Exploring plural values of ecosystem services: local peoples’ perceptions and implications for protected area management in the atlantic forest of Brazil Sustainability, 13 (3) (2021), pp. 1-20
dc.relationCreswell and Creswell, 2018 J. Creswell, J. Creswell Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifht) SAGE Publications, Inc (2018)
dc.relationDendoncker et al., 2018 N. Dendoncker, F. Turkelboom, F. Boeraeve, A. Boerema, S. Broekx, C. Fontaine, R. Demeyer, R. De Vreese, G. Devillet, H. Keune, L. Janssens, I. Liekens, E. Lord-Tarte, F. Popa, I. Simoens, N. Smeets, P. Ulenaers, A. Van Herzele, K. Van Tichelen, S. Jacobs Integrating ecosystem services values for sustainability? Evidence from the Belgium ecosystem services community of practice Ecosyst. Serv., 31 (2018), pp. 68-76
dc.relationDíaz et al., 2018 B.S. Díaz, U. Pascual, M. Stenseke, B. Martín-lópez, R.T. Watson, Z. Molnár, R. Hill, K.M.A. Chan, I.A. Baste, K.A. Brauman, S. Polasky, A. Church, M. Lonsdale, A. Larigauderie, P.W. Leadley, P.E. Alexander, V. Oudenhoven, F. Van Der Plaat, M. Schröter, et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people Science, 359 (6373) (2018)
dc.relationEbner et al., 2022 M. Ebner, V. Fontana, U. Schirpke, U. Tappeiner Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem services of mountain lakes in the European Alps Ecosyst. Serv., 53 (October 2021) (2022), Article 101386
dc.relationElder-Vass, 2022 D. Elder-Vass Pragmatism, critical realism and the study of value J. Crit. Realism (2022), pp. 1-27
dc.relationFriedrichsen et al., 2021 C.N. Friedrichsen, M.C. Monroe, S.H. Daroub, S.P. Wani Yuck! Plural valuation of constructed wetland maintenance for decentralized wastewater treatment in rural India Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 4 (January) (2021), pp. 1-16
dc.relationGale and Ednie, 2020 T. Gale, A. Ednie Can intrinsic, instrumental, and relational value assignments inform more integrative methods of protected area conflict resolution? Exploratory findings from Aysén, Chile J. Tourism Cult. Change, 18 (6) (2020), pp. 690-710
dc.relationGómez-Baggethun and Martín-López, 2015 E. Gómez-Baggethun, B. Martín-López Ecological economics perspectives on ecosystem services valuation Handbook of Ecological Economics (2015), pp. 260-282
dc.relationGsottbauer et al., 2015 E. Gsottbauer, I. Logar, J. van den Bergh Towards a fair, constructive and consistent criticism of all valuation languages: comment on Kallis et al. (2013) Ecol. Econ., 112 (2015), pp. 164-169
dc.relationGwet, 2015 K.L. Gwet On Krippendorff ’ S Alpha Coefficient (Issue 1971 (2015)
dc.relationHerbst et al., 2020 D.F. Herbst, L.C. Gerhardinger, D.A. Vila-Nova, F.G. de Carvalho, N. Hanazaki Integrated and deliberative multidimensional assessment of a subtropical coastal-marine ecosystem (Babitonga bay, Brazil) Ocean Coast Manag., 196 (July 2019) (2020), Article 105279
dc.relationHimes et al., 2020 A. Himes, K. Puettmann, B. Muraca Trade-offs between ecosystem services along gradients of tree species diversity and values Ecosyst. Serv., 44 (September 2019) (2020), Article 101133
dc.relationIDEAM, 2013 IDEAM Lineamientos conceptuales y metodológicos para la evaluación regional del agua - ERA 2013 (2013) Bogotá, Colombia2. Available at: http://documentacion.ideam.gov.co/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=10753 retrieved on 31.05.2023
dc.relationJacobs et al., 2016 S. Jacobs, N. Dendoncker, B. Martín-López, D.N. Barton, E. Gomez-Baggethun, F. Boeraeve, F.L. McGrath, K. Vierikko, D. Geneletti, K.J. Sevecke, N. Pipart, E. Primmer, P. Mederly, S. Schmidt, A. Aragão, H. Baral, R.H. Bark, T. Briceno, D. Brogna, et al. A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions Ecosyst. Serv., 22 (November) (2016), pp. 213-220
dc.relationKallis et al., 2013 G. Kallis, E. Gómez-Baggethun, C. Zografos To value or not to value? That is not the question Ecol. Econ., 94 (2013), pp. 97-105
dc.relationKenter, 2016 J.O. Kenter Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services Ecosyst. Serv., 21 (2016), pp. 291-307
dc.relationKoemle and Yu, 2020 D. Koemle, X. Yu Choice experiments in non-market value analysis: some methodological issues Forestry Economics Review, 2 (1) (2020), pp. 3-31
dc.relationLau, 2015 J. Lau What Matters to Whom and Why? Understanding the Importance of Coastal Ecosystem Services in Developing Coastal Communities (2015), pp. 2015-2017
dc.relationLi et al., 2021 M. Li, D. Liang, J. Xia, J. Song, D. Cheng, J. Wu, Y. Cao, H. Sun, Q. Li Evaluation of water conservation function of danjiang river basin in qinling mountains, China based on InVEST model J. Environ. Manag., 286 (February) (2021)
dc.relationLiquete et al., 2016 C. Liquete, A. Udias, G. Conte, B. Grizzetti, F. Masi Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits Ecosyst. Serv., 22 (December 2015) (2016), pp. 392-401
dc.relationLopes and Videira, 2019 R. Lopes, N. Videira How to articulate the multiple value dimensions of ecosystem services? Insights from implementing the PArticulatES framework in a coastal social-ecological system in Portugal Ecosyst. Serv., 38 (June) (2019), Article 100955
dc.relationManzolli et al., 2022 R. Manzolli, D. Blanco, L. Portz, A. Yanes, S. Zielinski, A. Ruiz, A. Suarez Large wood debris contributes to beach ecosystems but Colombian beachgoer’s do not recognize it Suatainability, 14 (2022), pp. 1-22
dc.relationMaydana et al., 2020 G. Maydana, M. Romagnoli, M. Cunha, M. Portapila Integrated valuation of alternative land use scenarios in the agricultural ecosystem of a watershed with limited available data, in the Pampas region of Argentina Sci. Total Environ., 714 (2020), Article 136430
dc.relationMelnikovas, 2018 A. Melnikovas Towards an explicit research methodology: adapting research onion model for futures studies Journal of Futures Studies, 23 (2) (2018), pp. 29-44
dc.relationMuñoz-Rios et al., 2020 L.A. Muñoz-Rios, J. Vargas-Villegas, A. Suarez Local perceptions about rural abandonment drivers in the Colombian coffee region: insights from the city of Manizales Land Use Pol., 91 (2020)
dc.relationNeuteleers and Hugé, 2021 S. Neuteleers, J. Hugé Value pluralism in ecosystem services assessments: closing the gap between academia and conservation practitioners Ecosyst. Serv., 49 (May) (2021), pp. 2016-2017
dc.relationPandeya et al., 2016 B. Pandeya, W. Buytaert, Z. Zulkafli, T. Karpouzoglou, F. Mao, D.M. Hannah A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions Ecosyst. Serv., 22 (October) (2016), pp. 250-259
dc.relationPascual et al., 2017 U. Pascual, P. Balvanera, S. Dı, E. Roth, M. Stenseke, R.T. Watson, E. Ba, M. Islar, E. Kelemen, V. Maris, M. Quaas, S.M. Subramanian, H. Wittmer, A. Adlan, S. Ahn, Y.S. Al-hafedh, E. Amankwah, S.T. Asah, P. Berry, et al. Valuing nature ’ s contributions to people : the IPBES approach Erik Go Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health, 26–27 (2017), pp. 7-16
dc.relationPeck and Khirfan, 2021 M. Peck, L. Khirfan Improving the validity and credibility of the sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services in Amman, Jordan Ecol. Econ., 189 (2021), Article 107111
dc.relationPeh et al., 2016 K.S.H. Peh, I. Thapa, M. Basnyat, A. Balmford, G.P. Bhattarai, R.B. Bradbury, C. Brown, S.H.M. Butchart, M. Dhakal, H. Gurung, F.M.R. Hughes, M. Mulligan, B. Pandeya, A.J. Stattersfield, D.H.L. Thomas, M. Walpole, J.C. Merriman Synergies between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service provision: lessons on integrated ecosystem service valuation from a Himalayan protected area, Nepal Ecosyst. Serv., 22 (2016), pp. 359-369
dc.relationPereira et al., 2020 L.M. Pereira, K.K. Davies, E. den Belder, S. Ferrier, S. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, H.J. Kim, J.J. Kuiper, S. Okayasu, M.G. Palomo, H.M. Pereira, G. Peterson, J. Sathyapalan, M. Schoolenberg, R. Alkemade, S. Carvalho Ribeiro, A. Greenaway, J. Hauck, N. King, T. Lazarova, et al. Developing multiscale and integrative nature–people scenarios using the Nature Futures Framework People and Nature, 2 (4) (2020), pp. 1172-1195
dc.relationPhelan and Jacobs, 2016 A.(Anya) Phelan, S. Jacobs Facing the true cost of fracking; social externalities and the role of integrated valuation Ecosyst. Serv., 22 (November) (2016), pp. 348-358
dc.relationRaymond and Kenter, 2016 C.M. Raymond, J.O. Kenter Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services Ecosyst. Serv., 21 (2016), pp. 241-257
dc.relationRincón-Ruiz et al., 2019 A. Rincón-Ruiz, P. Arias-Arévalo, J.M. Núñez Hernández, H. Cotler, M. Aguado Caso, P. Meli, A. Tauro, V.D. Ávila Akerberg, V.S. Avila-Foucat, J.P. Cardenas, L.A. Castillo Hernández, L.G. Castro, V.A. Cerón Hernández, A. Contreras Araque, J. Deschamps-Lomeli, J.M. Galeana-Pizaña, K. Guillén Oñate, J.A. Hernández Aguilar, A.D. Jimenez, et al. Applying integrated valuation of ecosystem services in Latin America: insights from 21 case studies Ecosyst. Serv., 36 (45) (2019), Article 100901
dc.relationRojas et al., 2019 A.M. Rojas, C.A. Ruiz–Agudelo, M.C. Diazgranados, H. Polanco, R. Anderson Approach to an integral valuation of mangrove’s ecosystem services in a marine protected area. Colombian Pacific region Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8 (3) (2019), pp. 322-342
dc.relationSaarikoski et al., 2016 H. Saarikoski, J. Mustajoki, D.N. Barton, D. Geneletti, J. Langemeyer, E. Gomez-Baggethun, M. Marttunen, P. Antunes, H. Keune, R. Santos Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services Ecosyst. Serv., 22 (November) (2016), pp. 238-249
dc.relationSpash, 2012 C.L. Spash New foundations for ecological economics Ecol. Econ., 77 (2012), pp. 36-47
dc.relationSuarez et al., 2021 A. Suarez, C. Ruiz-Agudelo, E. Castro-Escobar, G.Y. Flórez-Yepes, L.A. Vargas-Marín On the mismatches between the monetary and social values of air purification in the colombian andean region: a case study Forests, 12 (9) (2021)
dc.relationTEEB, 2010 TEEB The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB available at: http://teebweb.org/publications/teeb-for/synthesis/ (2010)
dc.relationTusznio et al., 2020 J. Tusznio, A. Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, M. Rechciński, A. Olszańska, M. Grodzińska-Jurczak Application of the ecosystem services concept at the local level – challenges, opportunities, and limitations Ecosyst. Serv., 42 (January) (2020)
dc.relationVillegas-Palacio et al., 2016 C. Villegas-Palacio, L. Berrouet, C. López, A. Ruiz, A. Upegui Lessons from the integrated valuation of ecosystem services in a developing country: three case studies on ecological, socio-cultural and economic valuation Ecosyst. Serv., 22 (November) (2016), pp. 297-308
dc.relationWam et al., 2016 H.K. Wam, N. Bunnefeld, N. Clarke, O. Hofstad Conflicting interests of ecosystem services: multi-criteria modelling and indirect evaluation of trade-offs between monetary and non-monetary measures Ecosyst. Serv., 22 (August) (2016), pp. 280-288
dc.relationZafra-Calvo et al., 2020 N. Zafra-Calvo, P. Balvanera, U. Pascual, J. Merçon, B. Martín-López, M. van Noordwijk, T.H. Mwampamba, S. Lele, C. Ifejika Speranza, P. Arias-Arévalo, D. Cabrol, D.M. Cáceres, P. O’Farrell, S.M. Subramanian, S. Devy, S. Krishnan, R. Carmenta, L. Guibrunet, Y. Kraus-Elsin, et al. Plural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: insights from the Global South Global Environ. Change, 63 (May) (2020), Article 102115
dc.relationZhang et al., 2004 L. Zhang, K. Hickel, W.R. Dawes, F.H.S. Chiew, A.W. Western, P.R. Briggs A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration Water Resour. Res., 40 (2) (2004), pp. 1-14
dc.relation12
dc.relation1
dc.relation9
dc.relation8
dc.rights© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844022019107
dc.subjectNature contributions to people
dc.subjectPlural valuation
dc.subjectSocial participation
dc.subjectIntegration
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.titleRecognizing, normalizing and articulating: an approach to highlight plural values of water ecosystem services in Colombia
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.coverageColombia


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución