On the influence of drained cyclic preloadings on the cyclic behaviour of Zbraslav sand

dc.creatorDuque, J.
dc.creatorRoháč, J.
dc.creatorMašín, D.
dc.date2023-03-02T16:33:51Z
dc.date2025
dc.date2023-03-02T16:33:51Z
dc.date2023
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T19:44:41Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T19:44:41Z
dc.identifierJ. Duque, J. Roháč, D. Mašín, On the influence of drained cyclic preloadings on the cyclic behaviour of Zbraslav sand, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Volume 165, 2023, 107666, ISSN 0267-7261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107666.
dc.identifier0267-7261
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/9942
dc.identifier10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107666
dc.identifier1879-341X
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifierREDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9171947
dc.descriptionThis article experimentally evaluates the influence of directional drained cyclic preloadings on the subsequent undrained monotonic and cyclic response of Zbraslav sand. The cyclic tests were performed on dense samples and under triaxial conditions. The experiments considered several different preloading directions, magnitude of the maximum deviatoric stress reached during the drained preloading stage and deviatoric stress amplitudes during the undrained shearing stage. The experimental results suggested that the rate of strains and pore water pressure accumulation, and therefore, the number of cycles to reach initial liquefaction or failure conditions are remarkably affected by the direction of the drained preloading history. In addition, the preloading direction plays a major role on the contractive/dilative response during the subsequent undrained monotonic loading. In particular, directional drained cyclic preloadings toward positive deviatoric stresses at constant mean effective stress and isotropic compression led to more dilative responses. Contrary, preloadings toward negative deviatoric stresses at constant mean effective stress led to more contractive responses. The results suggest that these major variations cannot be associated to the rather small changes in the relative density of the samples but likely due to fabric changes and induced anisotropy caused by the drained preloading history.
dc.format11 páginas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.publisherUnited Kingdom
dc.relationSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
dc.relation[1] Pan K, Cai Y, Yang Z, Pan X. Liquefaction of sand under monotonic and cyclic shear conditions: Impact of drained preloading history. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2019;126:105775.
dc.relation[2] Duque J, Ochmański M, Mašín D, Hong Y, Wang L. On the behavior of monopiles subjected to multiple episodes of cyclic loading and reconsolidation in cohesive soils. Comput Geotech 2021;134.
dc.relation[3] Duque J, Ochmański M, Mašín D. On the influence of multiple episodes of cyclic loading and reconsolidation on the behavior of monopiles embedded in finegrained soils. In: IACMAG 2022: Challenges and innovations in geomechanics. Turin, Italy; 2022, p. 95–101.
dc.relation[4] Liu Z, Xue J, Ye J. The effects of unloading on drained cyclic behaviour of Sydney sand. Acta Geotech 2021;16(9):2791–804.
dc.relation[5] Toyota H, Takada S. Variation of liquefaction strength induced by monotonic and cyclic loading histories. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2017;143(4):04016120.
dc.relation[6] Oda M, Kawamoto K, Suzuki K, Fujimori H, Sato M. Microstructural interpretation on reliquefaction of saturated granular soils under cyclic loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2001;127(5):416–23. [7] Fuentes W, Mašín D, Duque J. Constitutive model for monotonic and cyclic loading on anisotropic clays. Géotechnique 2021;71(8):657–73.
dc.relation[8] Duque J, Mašín D, Fuentes W. Improvement to the intergranular strain model for larger numbers of repetitive cycles. Acta Geotech 2020;15:3593–604.
dc.relation[9] Stallebrass S. Modelling the effect of recent stress history on the deformation of overconsolidated soils [Ph.D. thesis], London, UK: City, University of London; 1990.
dc.relation[10] Duque J, Yang M, Fuentes W, Mašín D, Taiebat M. Characteristic limitations of advanced plasticity and hypoplasticity models for cyclic loading of sands. Acta Geotech 2022;17:2235–57.
dc.relation[11] Afifi S, Richart J. Stress-history effects on shear modulus of soils. Soils Found 1973;13(1):77–95.
dc.relation[12] Atkinson J, Richardson D, Stallebrass S. Effect of recent stress history on the stiffness of overconsolidated soil. Géotechnique 1990;40(4):531–40.
dc.relation[13] Stallebrass S, Taylor R. The development and evaluation of a constitutive model for the prediction of ground movements in overconsolidated clay. Géotechnique 1997;47(2):235–53.
dc.relation[14] Duque J, Mašín D, Fuentes W. Hypoplastic model for clays with stiffness anisotropy. In: Proceedings of IACMAG 2021: Challenges and innovations in geomechanics. Turin, Italy; 2021, p. 414–21.
dc.relation[15] Finn L, Bransby P, Pickering D. Effect of strain history on liquefaction of sand. J Soil Mech Found Div 1970;96(6):1917–34.
dc.relation[16] Lee K, Albaisa A. Earthquake induced settlements in saturated sands. J Geotech Eng Div 1974;100(4):387–406.
dc.relation[17] Toki S, Kitago S. Effects of repeated loading on deformation behavior of dry sand. Soils Found 1974;14(1):95–103.
dc.relation[18] Ishihara K, Okada S. Effects of stress history on cyclic behavior of sand. Soils Found 1978;18(4):31–45.
dc.relation[19] Ishihara K, Okada S. Effects of large preshearing on cyclic behavior of sand. Soils Found 1982;22(3):109–25.
dc.relation[20] Suzuki T, Toki S. Effects of preshearing on liquefaction characteristics of saturated sand subjected to cyclic loading. Soils Found 1984;24(2):16–28.
dc.relation[21] Sriskandakumar S, Wijewickreme D, Byrne P. Multiple cyclic loading response of loose air-pluviated fraser river sand. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering. Lisbon, Portugal; 2012, p. 1–10.
dc.relation[22] Vaid Y, Thomas J. Liquefaction and post liquefaction behavior of sand. J. Geotech Eng 1995;121(2):163–73.
dc.relation[23] Seed H, Mori K, Chan C. Influence of seismic history on liquefaction of sands. J Geotech Eng Div 1977;103(4):257–70.
dc.relation[24] Seed R, Lee S, Jong H. Penetration and liquefaction resistances: Prior seismic history effects. J Geotech Eng 1988;114(6):691–7.
dc.relation[25] Sivathayalan S, Yazdi M. Influence of strain history on postliquefaction deformation characteristics of sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2014;140(3):04013019.
dc.relation[26] Doanh T, Ibraim E, Matiotti R. Undrained instability of very loose Hostun sand in triaxial compression and extension. Part 1: Experimental observations. Mech Cohes-Frict Mater 1997;2(1):47–70.
dc.relation[27] Dubujet P, Doanh T. Undrained instability of very loose Hostun sand in triaxial compression and extension. Part 2: Theoretical analysis using an elastoplasticity model. Mech Cohes-Frict Mater 1997;2(1):71–92.
dc.relation[28] Doanh T, Dubujet P, Touron G. Exploring the undrained induced anisotropy of Hostun RF loose sand. Acta Geotech 2010;5(4):239–56.
dc.relation[29] Doanh T, Finge Z, Boucq S, Dubujet P. Histotropy of Hostun RF loose sand. In: Modern trends in geomechanics. 2006, p. 399–411.
dc.relation[30] Gajo A, Piffer L. The effects of preloading history on the undrained behaviour of saturated loose sand. Soils Found 1999;39(6):43–53.
dc.relation[31] Bobei D, Wanatowski D, Rahman M, Lo S, Gnanendran C. The effect of drained pre-shearing on the undrained behaviour of loose sand with a small amount of fines. Acta Geotech 2013;8:311–22.
dc.relation[32] Finge Z, Doanh T, Dubujet P. Undrained anisotropy of Hostun RF loose sand: New experimental investigations. Can Geotech J 2006;43(11):1195–212.
dc.relation[33] Doanh T, Finge Z, Boucq S. Effects of previous deviatoric strain histories on the undrained behaviour of Hostun RF loose sand. Geotech Geol Eng 2012;30(4):697–712.
dc.relation[34] Arab A, Sadek M, Belkhatir M, Shahrour I. Monotonic preloading effect on the liquefaction resistance of chlef silty sand: A laboratory study. Arab J Sci Eng 2014;39(2):685–94.
dc.relation[35] Duque J, Roháč J, Mašín D, Najser J. Experimental investigation on Malaysian kaolin under monotonic and cyclic loading: Iinspection of undrained miner’s rule and drained cyclic preloading. Acta Geotech 2022;17:4953–75.
dc.relation[36] Andersen K. Cyclic soil parameters for offshore foundation design. In: Frontiers in offshore geotechnics III: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on frontiers in offshore geotechnics. Leiden; 2015, p. 5–82.
dc.relation[37] Wichtmann T, Niemunis A, Triantafyllidis T, Poblete M. Correlation of cyclic preloading with the liquefaction resistance. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2005;25(12):923–32.
dc.relation[38] Wichtmann T. Soil behaviour under cyclic loading: Experimental observations, constitutive description and applications. Habilitation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT); 2016.
dc.relation[39] Clayton C, Heymann G. Stiffness of geomaterials at very small strains. Géotechnique 2001;51(3):245–55.
dc.relation[40] Hong Y, Koo C, Zhou C, Ng C, Wang L. Small strain path-dependent stiffness of Toyoura sand: Laboratory measurement and numerical implementation. Int J Geomech 2017;17(1):04016036.
dc.relation[41] Wang L, Wang H, Zhu B, Hong Y. Comparison of monotonic and cyclic lateral response between monopod and tripod bucket foundations in medium dense sand. Ocean Eng 2018;155:88–105.
dc.relation[42] Ochmański M, Mašín D, Duque J, Hong Y, Wang L. Performance of tripod foundations for offshore wind turbines: A numerical study. Géotech Lett 2021;11(3):230–8.
dc.relation[43] Gudehus G, Amorosi A, Gens A, Herle I, Kolymbas D, Mašín D, et al. The soilmodels.info project. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 2008;32(12):1571–2.
dc.relation[44] Mašín D. Incorporation of meta-stable structure into hypoplasticity. In: Proceedings of the international conference on numerical modelling of construction processes in geotechnical engineering for urban environment. Bochum, Germany; 2006, p. 283–90.
dc.relation[45] Feda J. Základy mechaniky partikulárních látek. Prague: Československá akademie věd; 1977.
dc.relation[46] Herle I, Gudehus G. Determination of parameters of a hypoplastic constitutive model from properties of grain assemblies. Mech Cohes-Frict Mater 1999;4(5):461–86.
dc.relation[47] Feda J. Notes on the effect of grain crushing on the granular soil behaviour. Eng Geol 2002;63(1–2):93–8.
dc.relation[48] Feda J. Mechanics of particulate materials, the principles. Prague: Elsevier Science; 1982.
dc.relation[49] Feda J. Stress-path dependent shear strength of sand. J Geotech Eng 1994;120(6):958–74.
dc.relation[50] Duque J. Contributions to the experimental investigation and numerical description of soil cyclic behavior [Ph.D. thesis], Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University; 2021.
dc.relation[51] Boháč J, Feda J. Membrane penetration in triaxial tests. Geotech Test J 1992;15(3):288–94.
dc.relation[52] Wichtmann T, Steller K, Triantafyllidis T. On the influence of the sample preparation method on strain accumulation in sand under high-cyclic loading.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2020;131:106028.
dc.relation[53] Wichtmann T. Explicit accumulation model for non-cohesive soils under cyclic loading [Ph.D. thesis], Germany: Ruhr-Universität Bochum; 2005.
dc.relation[54] Lade P. The stress-strain and strength characteristics of cohesionless soils [Ph.D. thesis], University of California, Berkeley; 1972.
dc.relation[55] Head K. Manual of soil laboratory testing. Volume 3: Effective stress tests. 2nd ed.. John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
dc.relation[56] Wichtmann T, Triantafyllidis T. An experimental data base for the development, calibration and verification of constitutive models for sand with focus to cyclic loading. Part I: Tests with monotonic loading and stress cycles. Acta Geotech 2016;11(4):739–61.
dc.relation[57] Li L, Dan H, Wang L. Undrained behavior of natural marine clay under cyclic loading. Ocean Eng 2011;38(16):1792–805.
dc.relation[58] Vinck K, Liu T, E. U, Jardine R. An appraisal of end conditions in advanced monotonic and cyclic triaxial testing on a range of geomaterials. In: 7th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Vol.92. 2019.
dc.relation[59] Zografou D. Investigation of shallow skirted foundations under undrained cyclic loading [Ph.D. thesis], University of Western Australia; 2018.
dc.relation[60] Son S, Yoon J, Kim J. Simplified method for defining 2-dimensional design failure curve of marine silty sand under dynamic loading. J Mar Sci Eng 2020;8(1):1–15.
dc.relation[61] Blaker O, Andersen K. Shear strength of dense to very dense dogger bank sand. In: Frontiers in offshore geotechnics III: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on frontiers in offshore geotechnics. Leiden; 2015, p. 1167–72.
dc.relation[62] Blaker O, Andersen K. Cyclic properties of dense to very dense silica sand. Soils Found 2019;59(4):982–1000.
dc.relation[63] Hyodo M, Hyde A, Aramaki N. Liquefaction of crushable soils. Géotechnique 1998;48(4):527–43.
dc.relation[64] Parra A. Ottawa F-65 sand characterization [Ph.D. thesis], Davis: University of California; 2016.
dc.relation[65] Ueda K, Vargas R, Uemura K. LEAP-Asia-2018: Stress-strain response of Ottawa sand in cyclic torsional shear tests. DesignSafe-CI 2018.
dc.relation[66] Fuentes W. Contributions in mechanical modelling of fill materials [Ph.D. thesis], Germany: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; 2014.
dc.relation[67] Ghionna V, Porcino D. Liquefaction resistance of undisturbed and reconstituted samples of a natural coarse sand from undrained cyclic triaxial tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2006;132(2):194–202.
dc.relation[68] Yang J, Sze H. Cyclic behaviour and resistance of saturated sand under non-symmetrical loading conditions. Géotechnique 2011;61(1):59–73.
dc.relation[69] Yang J, Sze H. Cyclic strength of sand under sustained shear stress. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2011;137(12):1275–85.
dc.relation[70] Fuentes W, Gil M, Duque J. Dynamic simulation of the sudden settlement of a mine waste dump under earthquake loading. Int J Min, Reclam Environ 2019;33(6):425–43.
dc.relation[71] Sharma S, Ismail M. Monotonic and cyclic behavior of two calcareous soils of different origins. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2006;132(12):1581–91.
dc.relation[72] Wijewickreme D, Sriskandakumar S, Byrne P. Cyclic loading response of loose air-pluviated Fraser river sand for validation of numerical models simulating centrifuge tests. Can Geotech J 2005;42(2):550–61.
dc.relation[73] Vaid Y, Chung E, Kuerbis R. Preshearing and undrained response of sand. Soils Found 1989;29(4):49–61.
dc.relation[74] Vaid Y, Chern J. Effect of static shear on resistance to liquefaction. Soils Found 1983;23(1):47–60.
dc.relation[75] Wichtmann T, Triantafyllidis T. An experimental data base for the development, calibration and verification of constitutive models for sand with focus to cyclic loading. Part II: Tests with strain cycles and combined loading. Acta Geotech 2016;11(4):763–74.
dc.relation11
dc.relation1
dc.relation165
dc.rights© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.sourcehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726122005115
dc.subjectTriaxial
dc.subjectCyclic loading
dc.subjectStress history
dc.subjectSand
dc.titleOn the influence of drained cyclic preloadings on the cyclic behaviour of Zbraslav sand
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución