Prospects for developing the legal regulation of digital platforms
Perspectivas de desarrollo de la regulación legal de las plataformas digitales
dc.creator | Anatolyevna Kirillova, Elena | |
dc.creator | El'darovich Zulfugarzade, Teymur | |
dc.creator | Evgenyevich Blinkov, Oleg | |
dc.creator | Aleksandrovna Serova, Olga | |
dc.creator | Aleksandrovna Mikhaylova, Irina | |
dc.date | 2023-05-25T14:39:38Z | |
dc.date | 2023-05-25T14:39:38Z | |
dc.date | 2021-08-24 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-03T19:43:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-03T19:43:53Z | |
dc.identifier | Kirillova, E., Zulfugarzade, T., Blinkov, O., Serova, O. & Mikhaylova, I. (2022). Prospects for developing the legal regulation of digital platforms. Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 35–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.02 | |
dc.identifier | 1692-3030 | |
dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/11323/10190 | |
dc.identifier | 10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.02 | |
dc.identifier | 2389-7716 | |
dc.identifier | Corporación Universidad de la Costa | |
dc.identifier | REDICUC - Repositorio - CUC | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9171847 | |
dc.description | The study considers the prospects for the legal regulation of public and private digital platforms. Digital platforms have replaced linear businesses and changed economic principles. The transition to digital technologies in the economy, business, and society substantiates the need for their legal regulation. The study aims at considering the legal status of public and private digital platforms, developing a new conceptual framework, determining the key features of digital platforms, and analyzing the prospects for developing legal regulation in this area. The paper compared management contexts in the public and commercial sectors. With the help of the generalization method, criteria for a new classification of digital platforms were proposed. The article used such methods as analysis, synthesis, deduction, and induction. The study represents a new definition of digital platforms, classifies them, and concludes that the introduction of special regulation of public and private digital platforms might require preliminary approbation, for example, in the form of an experimental legal regime. To ensure the comprehensive regulation of the activities of digital platforms, it is necessary to adopt international concepts that would allow creating uniform terms and principles. At the same time, regulation should consider the specifics of the existing regulation. On the one hand, it will be based on the dispositive method; on the other hand, it will be built over the imperative method. | |
dc.description | El estudio analizó las perspectivas para la regulación legal de las plataformas digitales estatales y privadas. Las plataformas digitales han sustituido el modelo de negocio lineal y han cambiado los principios económicos. La transición a la tecnología digital en la economía, los negocios y la esfera social, genera la necesidad de su regulación legal. El objetivo del estudio es examinar el estado legal de las plataformas digitales estatales y privadas, proponer un aparato conceptual, identificar las características clave de las plataformas digitales, y analizar las perspectivas para el desarrollo de la regulación legal en esta área. En el trabajo se utilizaron los métodos de análisis comparativo de los contextos de gestión en los sectores estatal y comercial, a través del método de generalización se propuso un criterio para la nueva tipificación de plataformas digitales, se utilizaron además, métodos de análisis, síntesis, deducción e inducción. El estudio propone una definición de autor de las plataformas digitales, una clasificación de las plataformas digitales, y concluye que la introducción de una nueva regulación especial de las plataformas digitales estatales y privadas, puede requerir la aprobación previa de esta regulación, por ejemplo, en el formato de un régimen legal experimental. Para la regulación integrada de las actividades de las plataformas digitales, es conveniente adoptar conceptos internacionales que permitan crear términos y principios uniformes. Al mismo tiempo, la regulación debe tener en cuenta las características de la regulación existente de ciertas áreas. En un caso, se basaría en un método dispositivo, en otro caso, en un método imperativo. | |
dc.format | 18 Páginas | |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Corporación Universidad de la Costa | |
dc.publisher | Colombia | |
dc.relation | Jurídicas CUC | |
dc.relation | Andersson, J. (2017). Platform logic: an interdisciplinary approach to the platform-based economy. Policy & Internet, 9(4), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.159 | |
dc.relation | Bozeman, B. (2002). Public-value failure: when efficient markets may not do. Public Adminis-tration Review, 62(2), 145– 161. Dsiponible en https://www.jstor.org/stable/3109898 | |
dc.relation | Brown, A., Fishenden, J., Thompson, M. & Venters, W. (2017). Appraising the impact and role of plat-form models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service re-form: towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2),167–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.003 | |
dc.relation | da Silva, V. J. & Chiarini, T. (2021). Technological progress and political systems: non-institutional digital platforms and political transformation. Technology in Society, 64(C),101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101460 | |
dc.relation | Delgosha, M. S. & Hajiheydari, N. (2020). On-demand service platforms pro/anti adoption cognition: Examining the contextspecific reasons. Journal of Business Research, 121, 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.031 | |
dc.relation | Dijck, J. (2019). Governing digital societies: private platforms, public values. Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105377 | |
dc.relation | Evans, D. S. & Schmalensee, R. (2017). Multi-sided Platforms. In: M. Vernengo, E. Pérez & B. Rosser (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_3069-1 | |
dc.relation | Gawer, A. (2020). Digital platforms’ boundaries: the interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning, [In Press], 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045 | |
dc.relation | Gil-Garcia, R. (2012). Towards a smart state? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration and beyond. Information Polity, 17(3-4), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-000287 | |
dc.relation | Haberly, D., MacDonald-Korth, D., Urban, M. & Wójcik, D. (2019). Asset management as a digital platform industry: a global financial network perspective. Geoforum, 106, 167–181.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.08.009 | |
dc.relation | Habrat, D. (2020). Legal challenges of digitalization and automation in the context of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 938–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.132 | |
dc.relation | Haenschen, K. & Wolf, J. (2019). Disclaiming responsibility: how platforms deadlocked the Federal Election Commission's efforts to regulate digital political advertising. Telecommunications Policy, 43(8), 101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.04.008 | |
dc.relation | Hasan, M. & Starly, B. (2020). Decentralized cloud manufacturingas-a-service (CMaaS) platform architecture with configurable digital assets. Journal of Manufacturing Systems,56(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.05.017 | |
dc.relation | Ivanov, A. A. (2017). Aggregation business and law. Law, 5, 145–156. | |
dc.relation | Janssen, M. & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platformbased governance – doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003 | |
dc.relation | Jovanovic, M., Sjödin, D. & Parida, V. (2021). Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms. Technovation, [In Press]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218 | |
dc.relation | Kirillova, E. A., Okriashvili, T. G., Yakupuv, A. G. & Pavlyuk, A. V. (2020). Legal status, role and features of electronic document management. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(Extra12), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4280116 | |
dc.relation | Klievink, B., Bharosa, N. & Tan, Y.-H.. (2016). The collaborative realization of public values and business goals: Governance and infrastructure of public-private information platforms. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 67–79. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.12.002 | |
dc.relation | Lanamäki, A. & Tuvikene, T. (2021). Framing digital future: selective formalization and legitimation of ridehailing platforms in Estonia. Geoforum, [In Press]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.016 | |
dc.relation | Lathrop, D. & Ruma, L. (2010). Government as a platform. In: D. Lapthrop & L. Ruma, Open Government, (pp. 13–40). Sebastopol: O'Reilly. | |
dc.relation | Marsden, C., Meyer, T. & Brown, I. (2020). Platform values and democratic elections: how can the law regulate digital disinformation? Computer Law & Security Review, 36(1),105373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105373 | |
dc.relation | Mäntymäki, M., Baiyere, A. & Islam, A. (2019). Digital platforms and the changing nature of physical work: Insights from ridehailing. International Journal of Information Management,49, 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.007 | |
dc.relation | Moazed, A. & Johnson, N. L. (2016). Modern monopolies: what it takes to dominate the 21st century economy. New York: Saint Martins' Press. | |
dc.relation | Perry, M. J. (2016). The platform transformation: how IoT will change IT, and when. Sebastopol: O'Reily Media. | |
dc.relation | Stecken, J., Ebel, M., Bartelt, M., Poeppelbuss, J. & Kuhlenkötter, B. (2019). Digital shadow platform as an innovative business model. Procedia CIRP, 83, 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.130 | |
dc.relation | Sullivan, C. (2018). Digital identity – from emergent legal concept to new reality. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(4), 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.05.015 | |
dc.relation | Zutshi, A. & Grilo, A. (2019). The Emergence of digital platforms: a conceptual platform architecture and impact on industrial engineering. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136,546–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.027 | |
dc.relation | 52 | |
dc.relation | 35 | |
dc.relation | 1 | |
dc.relation | 18 | |
dc.rights | © The author; licensee Universidad de la Costa - CUC | |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
dc.source | https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/3546 | |
dc.subject | Legal regulation | |
dc.subject | Classification of digital platforms | |
dc.subject | State digital platforms | |
dc.subject | Private digital platforms | |
dc.subject | Platform-based approach to public administration | |
dc.subject | Regulación legal | |
dc.subject | Clasificación de plataformas digitales | |
dc.subject | Plataformas digitales estatales | |
dc.subject | Plataformas digitales privadas | |
dc.subject | Enfoque de plataforma en la administración estatal | |
dc.title | Prospects for developing the legal regulation of digital platforms | |
dc.title | Perspectivas de desarrollo de la regulación legal de las plataformas digitales | |
dc.type | Artículo de revista | |
dc.type | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.type | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
dc.type | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |