dc.creatorOrtiz Barrios, Miguel Angel
dc.creatorFelizzola Jiménez, Heriberto
dc.creatorNieto Isaza, Santiago
dc.date2018-11-21T19:23:38Z
dc.date2018-11-21T19:23:38Z
dc.date2014
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T19:40:29Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T19:40:29Z
dc.identifier0302-9743
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11323/1655
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifierREDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9171298
dc.descriptionThis paper presents an ANP technique applied to identify and priori- tize Six Sigma projects for healthcare providers whose results allow selecting the project that ensures the maximum financial benefits for the healthcare com- pany. First, the Six Sigma evaluation model is determined, then the criteria weights are established by ANP (Analytic Network Process) and finally, results from ANP and ANP- DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Labo- ratory) are compared. The results show a better decision making performance for ANP-DEMATEL. An empirical case from healthcare sector is presented, showing the effectiveness of the proposed technique.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de la Costa CUC
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectSix Sigma
dc.subjectEvaluation model
dc.subjectANP
dc.subjectHealthcare provider
dc.titleComparative analysis between anp and anp- dematel for six sigma project selection process in a healthcare provider
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución