Stakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimes

dc.creatorWang, Weifang
dc.creatorvan Noorloos, Femke
dc.creatorSpit, Tejo
dc.date2021-01-22T23:50:49Z
dc.date2021-01-22T23:50:49Z
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T19:14:06Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T19:14:06Z
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/7759
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104357
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifierREDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9169119
dc.descriptionUnderstanding stakeholder power relations—such as between land sellers, land buyers, and local governments—is crucial to understanding Land Value Capture (LVC). While scholars have focused on stakeholder relationships through approaches such as stakeholder salience, stakeholder interaction, stakeholder value network, and stakeholder multiplicity, much research either places insufficient focus on power or only stresses partial attributes of power. As a result, the role of power relations among key stakeholders in LVC remains insufficiently explored. Our contribution is a new analytical framework for stakeholder power dynamics surrounding LVC. This provides an empirical analysis by comparing the public (China) and the private (U.S.) dominant regimes, through the perspectives of power direction, strength, and mechanism. To conceptualize the three perspectives of power in LVC, we constructed an analytical matrix and then categorized data in terms of stakeholder, space, and time perspectives. Based on empirical findings, four emerging dilemmas shed light on consequences for LVC policy making as well as areas in need of further research
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.relationLand-property markets and planning: A special case Land Use Policy, 41 (2014), pp. 533-540
dc.relationA theory of the urban land market Papers in Regional Science, 6 (1960), pp. 149-157
dc.relationLand use regulations and property values: The’Windfalls Capture’idea revisited (2012), pp. 755-786
dc.relationTaxing land for urban containment: Reflections on a Dutch debate Land Use Policy, 26 (2009), pp. 233-241
dc.relationFactors Influencing the Value of Urban Land: Evidence from Halifax‐Dartmouth, Canada Real Estate Economics, 13 (1985), pp. 361-377
dc.relationThe causal structure of land price determinants Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 54 (2006), pp. 227-245
dc.relationPerformance-based planning: perspectives from the United States, Australia, and New Zealand Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25 (2006), pp. 396-409
dc.relationConspicuous consumption behavior of land-lost farmers: A perspective of social identity Cities, 66 (2017), pp. 81-90
dc.relationBao and Peng, 2016 H. Bao, Y. Peng Effect of land expropriation on land-lost farmers’ entrepreneurial action: A case study of Zhejiang Province Habitat International, 53 (2016), pp. 342-349
dc.relationBatt, 2001 H.W. Batt Value Capture as a Policy Tool in Transportation Economics: An Exploration in Public Finance in the Tradition of Henry George American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60 (2001), pp. 195-228
dc.relationBeaton, 1991 W.P. Beaton The impact of regional land-use controls on property values: the case of the New Jersey Pinelands Land Economics, 67 (1991), pp. 172-194
dc.relationBeritelli and Laesser, 2011 P. Beritelli, C. Laesser Power dimensions and influence reputation in tourist destinations: Empirical evidence from a network of actors and stakeholders Tourism Management, 32 (2011), pp. 1299-1309
dc.relationBorras, 2003 S.M. Borras Questioning market‐led agrarian reform: Experiences from Brazil, Colombia and South Africa Journal of agrarian change, 3 (2003), pp. 367-394
dc.relationBoucher et al., 2005 S.R. Boucher, B.L. Barham, M.R. Carter The Impact of “Market-Friendly” Reforms on Credit and Land Markets in Honduras and Nicaragua World Development, 33 (2005), pp. 107-128
dc.relationBowman and Ambrosini, 2000 C. Bowman, V. Ambrosini Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy British journal of management, 11 (2000), pp. 1-15
dc.relationBoyd, 2011 D. Boyd Land Value Taxation: Theory, Evidence, and Practice F. Richard (Ed.), Dye and Richard W, Wiley Online Library, England (2011)
dc.relationCai, 2017 M. Cai Revenue, time horizon, and land allocation in China Land Use Policy, 62 (2017), pp. 101-112
dc.relationCameron et al., 2011 B.G. Cameron, E.F. Crawley, W. Feng, M. Lin Strategic decisions in complex stakeholder environments: a theory of generalized exchange Engineering Management Journal, 23 (2011), pp. 37-45
dc.relationCao et al., 2008 G. Cao, C. Feng, R. Tao Local “land finance” in China’s urban expansion: challenges and solutions China & World Economy, 16 (2008), pp. 19-30
dc.relationCapozza et al., 2002 D.R. Capozza, P.H. Hendershott, C. Mack, C.J. Mayer Determinants of real house price dynamics National Bureau of Economic Research. (2002)
dc.relationChapman, 2017 J. Chapman Value Capture Taxation as an Infrastructure Funding Technique Public Works Management & Policy, 22 (2017), pp. 31-37
dc.relationChen and Kung, 2016 T. Chen, J.K.S. Kung Do land revenue windfalls create a political resource curse? Evidence from China Journal of Development Economics, 123 (2016), pp. 86-106
dc.relationCheshire and Sheppard, 1995 P. Cheshire, S. Sheppard On the price of land and the value of amenities Economica (1995), pp. 247-267
dc.relationCheshire, 2013 P.C. Cheshire Land market regulation: market versus policy failures Journal of property research, 30 (2013), pp. 170-188
dc.relationChi-Man Hui et al., 2004 E. Chi-Man Hui, V. Sze-Mun Ho, D. Kim-Hin Ho Land value capture mechanisms in Hong Kong and Singapore: A comparative analysis Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 22 (2004), pp. 76-100
dc.relationChoumert and Phélinas, 2015 J. Choumert, P. Phélinas Determinants of agricultural land values in Argentina Ecological Economics, 110 (2015), pp. 134-140
dc.relationCigdem and Wood, 2012 M. Cigdem, G. Wood Choice and government intervention in housing markets International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home (2012), pp. 137-143
dc.relationColeman and Grimes, 2010 A. Coleman, A. Grimes Betterment taxes, capital gains and benefit cost ratios Economics Letters, 109 (2010), pp. 54-56
dc.relationColwell and Munneke, 1997 P.F. Colwell, H.J. Munneke The structure of urban land prices Journal of Urban Economics, 41 (1997), pp. 321-336
dc.relationConnolly and Wall, 2016 C. Connolly, A. Wall Value capture: A valid means of funding PPPs? Financial Accountability & Management, 32 (2016), pp. 157-178
dc.relationCzyżewski and Matuszczak, 2016 B. Czyżewski, A. Matuszczak A new land rent theory for sustainable agriculture Land Use Policy, 55 (2016), pp. 222-229
dc.relationCzyżewski et al., 2017 B. Czyżewski, G. Przekota, A. Poczta-Wajda The incidence of agricultural policy on the land market in Poland: Two-dimensional and multilevel analysis Land Use Policy, 63 (2017), pp. 174-185
dc.relationDavis and Heathcote, 2007 M.A. Davis, J. Heathcote The price and quantity of residential land in the United States Journal of Monetary Economics, 54 (2007), pp. 2595-2620
dc.relationDavis and Palumbo, 2008 M.A. Davis, M.G. Palumbo The price of residential land in large US cities Journal of Urban Economics, 63 (2008), pp. 352-384
dc.relationde Bussy and Kelly, 2010 N.M. de Bussy, L. Kelly Stakeholders, politics and power: Towards an understanding of stakeholder identification and salience in government Journal of Communication Management, 14 (2010), pp. 289-305
dc.relationDiamond, 1985 N. Diamond Rural Collectivization and Decollectivization in China—A Review Article The Journal of Asian Studies, 44 (1985), pp. 785-792
dc.relationDing, 2003 C. Ding Land policy reform in China: assessment and prospects Land use policy, 20 (2003), pp. 109-120
dc.relationDing, 2007 C. Ding Policy and praxis of land acquisition in China Land use policy, 24 (2007), pp. 1-13
dc.relationDing and Zhao, 2014 C. Ding, X. Zhao Land market, land development and urban spatial structure in Beijing Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 83-90
dc.relationDu et al., 2015 J. Du, Y. Lu, Z. Tao Government expropriation and Chinese-style firm diversification Journal of Comparative Economics, 43 (2015), pp. 155-169
dc.relationDu et al., 2014 J. Du, J.-C. Thill, R.B. Peiser, C. Feng Urban land market and land-use changes in post-reform China: A case study of Beijing Landscape and Urban Planning, 124 (2014), pp. 118-128
dc.relationEddie et al., 2004 C.M.H. Eddie, S.M.H. Vivian, K.H.H. David Land value capture mechanisms in Hong Kong and Singapore: A comparative analysis Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 22 (2004), pp. 76-100
dc.relationEidelman, 2016 G. Eidelman Rethinking public land ownership and urban development: A Canadian perspective Cities, 55 (2016), pp. 122-126
dc.relationEmerson, 1962 R.M. Emerson Power-dependence relations American sociological review (1962), pp. 31-41
dc.relationEvans, 1983 A.W. Evans The determination of the price of land Urban Studies, 20 (1983), pp. 119-129
dc.relationEvans, 1999 A.W. Evans The land market and government intervention Handbook of regional and urban economics, 3 (1999), pp. 1637-1669
dc.relationFeng et al., 2014 L. Feng, H.X.H. Bao, Y. Jiang Land reallocation reform in rural China: A behavioral economics perspective Land Use Policy, 41 (2014), pp. 246-259
dc.relationFeng, 2013 W. Feng Strategic management for large engineering projects: the stakeholder value network approach Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2013)
dc.relationFloetotto et al., 2016 M. Floetotto, M. Kirker, J. Stroebel Government intervention in the housing market: Who wins, who loses? Journal of Monetary Economics, 80 (2016), pp. 106-123
dc.relationFord and Johnson, 1998 R. Ford, C. Johnson The perception of power: Dependence and legitimacy in conflict Social Psychology Quarterly (1998), pp. 16-32
dc.relationFoucault, 1991 M. Foucault The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality University of Chicago Press (1991)
dc.relationFoucault, 1998 M. Foucault J. Faubion (Ed.), Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, Vol. 2 (1998)
dc.relationFriis and Nielsen, 2016 C. Friis, J.Ø. Nielsen Small-scale land acquisitions, large-scale implications: Exploring the case of Chinese banana investments in Northern Laos Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 117-129
dc.relationFrooman, 1999 J. Frooman Stakeholder influence strategies Academy of management review, 24 (1999), pp. 191-205
dc.relationGao et al., 2017 J. Gao, W. Chen, F. Yuan Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. Theoretical considerations Land Use Policy, 68 (2017), pp. 604-613
dc.relationGarza and Lizieri, 2016 N. Garza, C. Lizieri A spatial-temporal assessment of the Land Value Development Tax Land Use Policy, 50 (2016), pp. 449-460
dc.relationGaventa, 2003 J. Gaventa Power after Lukes: an overview of theories of power since Lukes and their application to development Participation Group, Institute of Development Studies., Brighton (2003)
dc.relationGhatak and Mookherjee, 2014 M. Ghatak, D. Mookherjee Land acquisition for industrialization and compensation of displaced farmers Journal of Development Economics, 110 (2014), pp. 303-312
dc.relationGleeson, 1994 B. Gleeson Reforming planning legislation: a New Zealand perspective (1994)
dc.relationGuo et al., 2015 S. Guo, L. Liu, Y. Zhao The business cycle implications of land financing in China Economic Modelling, 46 (2015), pp. 225-237
dc.relationHan and Kung, 2015 L. Han, J.K.-S. Kung Fiscal incentives and policy choices of local governments: Evidence from China Journal of Development Economics, 116 (2015), pp. 89-104
dc.relationHankinson, 2009 G. Hankinson Managing destination brands: establishing a theoretical foundation Journal of Marketing Management, 25 (2009), pp. 97-115
dc.relationHaque and Asami, 2014 A. Haque, Y. Asami Optimizing urban land use allocation for planners and real estate developers Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 46 (2014), pp. 57-69
dc.relationHein et al., 2017 A.M. Hein, M. Jankovic, W. Feng, R. Farel, J.H. Yune, B. Yannou Stakeholder power in industrial symbioses: A stakeholder value network approach Journal of Cleaner Production, 148 (2017), pp. 923-933
dc.relationHu and Qian, 2017 F.Z.Y. Hu, J. Qian Land-based finance, fiscal autonomy and land supply for affordable housing in urban China: A prefecture-level analysis Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 454-460
dc.relationHuang et al., 2017 X. Huang, X. Huang, Y. He, X. Yang Assessment of livelihood vulnerability of land-lost farmers in urban fringes: A case study of Xi’an, China Habitat International, 59 (2017), pp. 1-9
dc.relationHuang and Du, 2017 Z. Huang, X. Du Government intervention and land misallocation: Evidence from China Cities, 60 (2017), pp. 323-332
dc.relationHui et al., 2013 E.C.M. Hui, H.J. Bao, X.L. Zhang The policy and praxis of compensation for land expropriations in China: An appraisal from the perspective of social exclusion Land Use Policy, 32 (2013), pp. 309-316
dc.relationIngram and Hong, 2012 G.K. Ingram, Y.-h. Hong Value capture and land policies Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2012)
dc.relationIto et al., 2016 J. Ito, M. Nishikori, M. Toyoshi, H.N. Feuer The contribution of land exchange institutions and markets in countering farmland abandonment in Japan Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 582-593
dc.relationJaeger, 2013 W.K. Jaeger Determinants of urban land market outcomes: Evidence from California Land Use Policy, 30 (2013), pp. 966-973
dc.relationJäger, 2009 J. Jäger Land rent theory (2009)
dc.relationJones, 2014 C. Jones Land use planning policies and market forces: Utopian aspirations thwarted? Land Use Policy, 38 (2014), pp. 573-579
dc.relationLarsen et al., 2009 I.K. Larsen, M. Småstuen, T.B. Johannesen, F. Langmark, D.M. Parkin, F. Bray, B.J.E.j.o.c Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness European Journal of Cancer, 45 (2009), pp. 1218-1231
dc.relationLeeper et al., 2010 E.M. Leeper, T.B. Walker, S.-C.S. Yang Government investment and fiscal stimulus Journal of monetary Economics, 57 (2010), pp. 1000-1012
dc.relationLepak et al., 2007 D.P. Lepak, K.G. Smith, M.S. Taylor Value creation and value capture: a multilevel perspective Academy of management review, 32 (2007), pp. 180-194
dc.relationLerman and Shagaida, 2007 Z. Lerman, N. Shagaida Land policies and agricultural land markets in Russia Land Use Policy, 24 (2007), pp. 14-23
dc.relationLichtenberg and Ding, 2009 E. Lichtenberg, C. Ding Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China Journal of Urban Economics, 66 (2009), pp. 57-64
dc.relationLin and Zhu, 2014 R. Lin, D. Zhu A spatial and temporal analysis on land incremental values coupled with land rights in China Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 168-176
dc.relationLiu et al., 2016 T. Liu, G. Cao, Y. Yan, R.Y. Wang Urban land marketization in China: Central policy, local initiative, and market mechanism Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 265-276
dc.relationLiu et al., 2014 Y. Liu, F. Fang, Y. Li Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 6-12
dc.relationLong, 2014 H. Long Land use policy in China: Introduction Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 1-5
dc.relationMathur, 2013 S. Mathur Use of land pooling and reconstitution for urban development: Experiences from Gujarat, India Habitat International, 38 (2013), pp. 199-206
dc.relationMedda, 2012 F. Medda Land value capture finance for transport accessibility: a review Journal of Transport Geography, 25 (2012), pp. 154-161
dc.relationMeehan and Wright, 2011 J. Meehan, G.H. Wright Power priorities: A buyer–seller comparison of areas of influence Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17 (2011), pp. 32-41
dc.relationMeehan and Wright, 2012 J. Meehan, G.H. Wright The origins of power in buyer–seller relationships Industrial Marketing Management, 41 (2012), pp. 669-679
dc.relationMerinero-Rodríguez and Pulido-Fernández, 2016 R. Merinero-Rodríguez, J.I. Pulido-Fernández Analysing relationships in tourism: A review Tourism Management, 54 (2016), pp. 122-135
dc.relationMill, 1884 J.S. Mill Principles of political economy D. Appleton (1884)
dc.relationMills, 1969 E.S. Mills The value of urban land (1969)
dc.relationMiraftab, 2004 F. Miraftab Public-private partnerships: The Trojan horse of neoliberal development? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24 (2004), pp. 89-101
dc.relationMitchell et al., 1997 R.K. Mitchell, B.R. Agle, D.J. Wood Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts Academy of management review, 22 (1997), pp. 853-886
dc.relationMittal, 2014 J. Mittal Self-financing land and urban development via land readjustment and value capture Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 314-323
dc.relationMoroni, 2010 S. Moroni Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation: Towards nomocracy Planning Theory, 9 (2010), pp. 137-155
dc.relationNeedham, 1992 B. Needham A theory of land prices when land is supplied publicly: the case of the Netherlands Urban Studies, 29 (1992), pp. 669-686
dc.relationNeville and Menguc, 2006 B.A. Neville, B. Menguc Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders Journal of Business Ethics, 66 (2006), pp. 377-391
dc.relationObeng-Odoom, 2012 F. Obeng-Odoom Land reforms in Africa: Theory, practice, and outcome Habitat International, 36 (2012), pp. 161-170
dc.relationOliver, 1991 C. Oliver Strategic responses to institutional processes Academy of management review, 16 (1991), pp. 145-179
dc.relationPaik, 2014 W. Paik Land Developers, States, and Collusive Clientelism in Marketizing China Pacific Focus, 29 (2014), pp. 68-91
dc.relationPan et al., 2017 F. Pan, F. Zhang, S. Zhu, D. Wójcik Developing by borrowing? Inter-jurisdictional competition, land finance and local debt accumulation in China Urban Studies, 54 (2017), pp. 897-916
dc.relationPan et al., 2015 J.-N. Pan, J.-T. Huang, T.-F. Chiang Empirical study of the local government deficit, land finance and real estate markets in China China Economic Review, 32 (2015), pp. 57-67
dc.relationPhuc et al., 2014 N.Q. Phuc, A. Van Westen, A. Zoomers Agricultural land for urban development: The process of land conversion in Central Vietnam Habitat International, 41 (2014), pp. 1-7
dc.relationPils, 2016 E. Pils Assessing evictions and expropriations in China: Efficiency, credibility and rights Land Use Policy, 58 (2016), pp. 437-444
dc.relationQian, 2015 Z. Qian Land acquisition compensation in post-reform China: Evolution, structure and challenges in Hangzhou Land Use Policy, 46 (2015), pp. 250-257
dc.relationQun et al., 2015 W. Qun, L. Yongle, Y. Siqi The incentives of China’s urban land finance Land Use Policy, 42 (2015), pp. 432-442
dc.relationRabinow, 1991 P. Rabinow The Foulcault reader: an introduction to Foulcault’s thought Penguin, London (1991)
dc.relationRebelo, 2017 E.M. Rebelo Land betterment capture revisited: A methodology for territorial plans Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 392-407
dc.relationRowley, 1997 T.J. Rowley Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences Academy of management Review, 22 (1997), pp. 887-910
dc.relationSaito and Ruhanen, 2017 H. Saito, L. Ruhanen Power in tourism stakeholder collaborations: Power types and power holders Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31 (2017), pp. 189-196
dc.relationScoones, 1998 I. Scoones Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis (1998)
dc.relationShan et al., 2017 L. Shan, A.T.W. Yu, Y. Wu Strategies for risk management in urban–rural conflict: Two case studies of land acquisition in urbanising China Habitat International, 59 (2017), pp. 90-100
dc.relationShaw and Williams, 1994 G. Shaw, A.M. Williams Critical issues in tourism: a geographical perspective Blackwell Publishers (1994)
dc.relationSheehan and Ritchie, 2005 L.R. Sheehan, J.B. Ritchie Destination stakeholders exploring identity and salience Annals of Tourism Research, 32 (2005), pp. 711-734
dc.relationSikor and Müller, 2009 T. Sikor, D. Müller The Limits of State-Led Land Reform: An Introduction World Development, 37 (2009), pp. 1307-1316
dc.relationSlegtenhorst, 2013 I. Slegtenhorst From value creation to value capture: Instruments of indirect value capture to fund investments in road infrastructure projects (2013)
dc.relationSmall, 2007 L.-A. Small The sustainable rural livelihoods approach: a critical review Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement, 28 (2007), pp. 27-38
dc.relationSmith and Gihring, 2006 J.J. Smith, T.A. Gihring Financing transit systems through value capture American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65 (2006), pp. 751-786
dc.relationSmolka, 2013 M.O. Smolka Implementing value capture in Latin America: Policies and tools for urban development Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2013)
dc.relationSuhardiman et al., 2015 D. Suhardiman, M. Giordano, O. Keovilignavong, T. Sotoukee Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss Land Use Policy, 49 (2015), pp. 195-202
dc.relationSun et al., 2017 J. Sun, T. Chen, Z. Cheng, C.C. Wang, X. Ning A financing mode of Urban Rail transit based on land value capture: A case study in Wuhan City Transport Policy, 57 (2017), pp. 59-67
dc.relationSuzuki et al., 2015 H. Suzuki, J. Murakami, Y.-H. Hong, B. Tamayose Financing transit-oriented development with land values: Adapting land value capture in developing countries World Bank Publications (2015)
dc.relationTao et al., 2010 R. Tao, F. Su, M. Liu, G. Cao Land leasing and local public finance in China’s regional development: Evidence from prefecture-level cities Urban Studies, 47 (2010), pp. 2217-2236
dc.relationTian and Ma, 2009 L. Tian, W. Ma Government intervention in city development of China: A tool of land supply Land Use Policy, 26 (2009), pp. 599-609
dc.relationTimur and Getz, 2008 S. Timur, D. Getz A network perspective on managing stakeholders for sustainable urban tourism International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20 (2008), pp. 445-461
dc.relationTu et al., 2014 F. Tu, X. Yu, J. Ruan Industrial land use efficiency under government intervention: Evidence from Hangzhou, China Habitat International, 43 (2014), pp. 1-10
dc.relationTura, 2018 H.A. Tura Land rights and land grabbing in Oromia, Ethiopia Land Use Policy, 70 (2018), pp. 247-255
dc.relationVan der Krabben and Jacobs, 2013 E. Van der Krabben, H.M. Jacobs Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience Land Use Policy, 30 (2013), pp. 774-783
dc.relationVenkatraman, 1989 N. Venkatraman The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence Academy of management review, 14 (1989), pp. 423-444
dc.relationWalters, 2013 L.C. Walters Land value capture in policy and practice Journal of Property Tax Assessment & Administration, 10 (2013), p. 5
dc.relationWang and Ye, 2016 W. Wang, F. Ye The political economy of land finance in China Public Budgeting & Finance, 36 (2016), pp. 91-110
dc.relationWang and Hui, 2017 Y. Wang, E.C.-m. Hui Are local governments maximizing land revenue? Evidence from China China Economic Review, 43 (2017), pp. 196-215
dc.relationWang et al., 2015 Y. Wang, D. Potoglou, S. Orford, Y. Gong Bus stop, property price and land value tax: A multilevel hedonic analysis with quantile calibration Land Use Policy, 42 (2015), pp. 381-391
dc.relationWeersink et al., 1999 A. Weersink, S. Clark, C.G. Turvey, R. Sarker The effect of agricultural policy on farmland values Land Economics (1999), pp. 425-439
dc.relationWeixin and Dongsong, 1990 L. Weixin, Y. Dongsong China’s land use policy under change Land use policy, 7 (1990), pp. 198-201
dc.relationWendt, 1957 P.F. Wendt Theory of urban land values Land economics, 33 (1957), pp. 228-240
dc.relationWenner, 2016 F. Wenner Sustainable urban development and land value taxation: The case of Estonia Land Use Policy. (2016)
dc.relationWilcox, 2016 R.K. Wilcox An introduction to basic mechanics Orthopaedics and Trauma, 30 (2016), pp. 169-175
dc.relationWineman and Liverpool-Tasie, 2017 A. Wineman, L.S. Liverpool-Tasie Land markets and the distribution of land in northwestern Tanzania Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 550-563
dc.relationWrong, 2017 D. Wrong Power: Its forms, bases and uses Routledge (2017)
dc.relationXiaoyan and Xiaoshu, 2014 H. Xiaoyan, C. Xiaoshu Mode and Mechanism of Urban Land Redevelopment Journal of Landscape Research, 6 (2014), p. 22
dc.relationYan et al., 2014 S. Yan, X.J. Ge, Q. Wu Government intervention in land market and its impacts on land supply and new housing supply: Evidence from major Chinese markets Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 517-527
dc.relationYe and Wang, 2013 F. Ye, W. Wang Determinants of land finance in China: a study based on provincial-level panel data (2013)
dc.relationZhang and Xu, 2017 W. Zhang, H. Xu Effects of land urbanization and land finance on carbon emissions: A panel data analysis for Chinese provinces Land Use Policy, 63 (2017), pp. 493-500
dc.relationZhang et al., 2017 X. Zhang, Y. Lin, Y. Wu, M. Skitmore Industrial land price between China’s Pearl River Delta and Southeast Asian regions: Competition or Coopetition? Land Use Policy, 61 (2017), pp. 575-586
dc.relationZhang, 1997 X.Q. Zhang Urban land reform in China Land use policy, 14 (1997), pp. 187-199
dc.relationZheng et al., 2014 H. Zheng, X. Wang, S. Cao The land finance model jeopardizes China’s sustainable development Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 130-136
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourceland use policy
dc.sourcehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718317940#!
dc.subjectLand Value Capture
dc.subjectpower relation
dc.subjectstakeholder
dc.subjectpublic property
dc.subjectprivate property
dc.titleStakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimes
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución