Differences in the autonomic nervous system stress status of urban and rural school teachers

dc.creatorMendoza-Castejon, Daniel
dc.creatorFraile-Garcia, Javier
dc.creatorDiaz-Manzano, Montaña
dc.creatorFuentes García, Juan Pedro
dc.creatorClemente-Suárez, Vicente Javier
dc.date2021-01-24T20:25:35Z
dc.date2021-01-24T20:25:35Z
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T19:11:26Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T19:11:26Z
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/7760
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112925
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifierREDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9168685
dc.descriptionThe aim of the present study was to analyze differences in the autonomic stress status between rural and urban school teachers. We analyzed the autonomic modulation in 25 pre-school and primary school teachers (40±7.8 years) from a city school (n:11) and rural school (n:14) by the heart rate variability analysis. Rural school teachers presented significative higher values in RMSSD, pNN50 and SD1 heart rate variability variables than city teachers, related with better autonomic control. Working place location is a variable that affects the psychophysiological stress response in education professionals, since city school teachers presented a higher sympathetic modulation, showing a lower heart rate variability, than rural school teachers.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.relation[1] A. Alcaro, R. Huber, J. Panksepp Behavioral functions of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system: An affective neuroethological perspective Brain Res Rev, 56 (2) (2007), pp. 283-321
dc.relation[2] F.D. Alves, N. Schmitz, M. Figee, N. Abeling, G. Hasler, J. van der Meer, T. . . . van Amelsvoort Dopaminergic modulation of the human reward system: a placebo-controlled dopamine depletion fMRI study J Psychopharmacol, 25 (4) (2011), pp. 538-549
dc.relation[3] B.A. Anderson The attention habit: How reward learning shapes attentional selection Ann NY Acad Sci, 1369 (1) (2016), pp. 24-39,
dc.relation[4] V. Ashley, P. Vuilleumier, D. Swick Time course and specificity of event-related potentials to emotional expressions NeuroReport, 15 (1) (2004), pp. 211-216
dc.relation[5] S.P. Barrett, R.O. Pihl, C. Benkelfat, C. Brunelle, S.N. Young, M. Leyton The role of dopamine in alcohol self-administration in humans: individual differences Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 18 (6) (2008), pp. 439-447
dc.relation[6] A. Bartels, S. Zeki The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love NeuroImage, 21 (3) (2004), pp. 1155-1166, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.003
dc.relation[7] S. Bentin, T. Allison, A. Puce, E. Perez, G. McCarthy Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans J Cogn Neurosci, 8 (6) (1996), pp. 551-565, 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
dc.relation[8] K. Bernard, R. Simons, M. Dozier Effects of an attachment-based intervention on child protective services-referred mothers’ event-related potentials to children's emotions Child Dev, 6 (2015), pp. 1673-1684 10.111/cdev.12418
dc.relation[9] K.C. Berridge, T.E. Robinson What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Rev, 28 (3) (1998), pp. 309-369
dc.relation[10] J. Booij, G. Tissingh, A. Winogrodzka, E.A. van Royen Imaging of the dopaminergic neurotransmission system using single-photon emission tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with parkinsonism Eur J Nucl Med, 26 (2) (1999
dc.relation[11] S. Both, W. Everaerd, E. Laan, L. Gooren Effect of a single dose of levodopa on sexual response in men and women Neuropsychopharmacol, 30 (1) (2005), p. 173
dc.relation[12] K. Botzel, S. Schulze, S.R. Stodieck Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials Exp Brain Res, 104 (1) (1995), pp. 135-143
dc.relation[13] L. Boutsen, G.W. Humphreys, P. Praamstra, T. Warbrick Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the Thatcher illusion NeuroImage, 32 (2006), pp. 352-367
dc.relation[14] R.S. Bridges Neuroendocrine regulation of maternal behavior Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 36 (2015), pp. 178-196,
dc.relation[15] R.A. Cárdenas, L.J. Harris, M.W. Becker Sex differences in visual attention toward infant faces Evol Hum Behav, 34 (4) (2013), pp. 280-287,
dc.relation[16] F. Champagne, P. Chretien, C.W. Stevenson, T.Y. Zhang, A. Gratton, M.J. Meaney Variations in nucleus accumbens dopamine associated with individual differences in maternal behavior in the rat J Neurosci, 24 (17) (2004), pp. 4113-4123,
dc.relation[17] B.R. Collett, M. Stott-Miller, K.A. Kapp-Simon, M.L. Cunningham, M.L. Speltz Reading in children with orofacial clefts versus controls J Ped Psychol, 35 (2010), pp. 199-208,
dc.relation[18] L.C. Dang, J.P. O'Neil, W.J. Jagust Dopamine supports coupling of attention-related networks J Neurosci, 32 (28) (2012), pp. 9582-9587,
dc.relation[19] L. De Pascalis, N. Kkeli, B. Chakrabarti, L. Dalton, K. Vaillancourt, H. Rayson, S. Bicknell, T. Goodacre, P. Cooper, A. Stein, L. Murray Maternal gaze to the infant face: effects of infant age and facial configuration during mother-infant engagement in the first nine weeks Infant Behav Dev, 46 (2017), pp. 91-99,
dc.relation[20] Di Russo, Martínez F., Sereno A., M. I., S. Pitzalis, S.A. Hillyard Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential Hum Brain Mapp, 15 (2) (2002), pp. 95-111,
dc.relation[21] M. Dozier & the Infant Caregiver Project Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up Intervention. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE (2006)
dc.relation[22] J. Dudek, T. Colasante, A. Zuffianò, D.W. Haley Changes in Cortical Sensitivity to Infant Facial Cues from Pregnancy to Motherhood Predict Mother–Infant Bonding Child Dev. (2018),
dc.relation[23] M. Eimer Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces: Evidence from event-related brain potentials Cognitive Brain Research, 10 (2000), pp. 145-158,
dc.relation[24] A.E. Ferrey, N. Santascoy, E.J. McCrory, C. Thompson-Booth, L.C. Mayes, H.J. Rutherford Motivated attention and reward in parenting Parenting, 16 (4) (2016), pp. 284-301
dc.relation[25] R. Freunberger, W. Klimesch, M. Doppelmayr, Y. Höller Visual P2 component is related to theta phase-locking Neurosci Lett, 426 (3) (2007), pp. 181-186
dc.relation[26] A.M. Frodi Contribution of infant characteristics to child abuse Am J Ment Def. (1981
dc.relation[27] N. George, J. Evans, N. Fiori, J. Davidoff, B. Renault Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces Cognitive Brain Research, 4 (1996), pp. 65-76,
dc.relation[28] Gomez Gonzalez, C. M., V.P. Clark, S. Fan, S.J. Luck, S.A. Hillyard Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials Brain Topogr, 7 (1) (1994), pp. 41-51
dc.relation[29] A.C. Hahn, L.A. Symons, T. Kredel, K. Hanson, L. Hodgson, L. Schiavone, K.J. Jantzen Early and late event-related potentials are modulated by infant and adult faces of high and low attractiveness Social Neuroscience, 11 (2) (2016), pp. 207-220,
dc.relation[30] H. Halit, M. De Haan, M.H. Johnson Modulation of event-related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces NeuroReport, 11 (9) (2000), pp. 1871-1875,
dc.relation[31] F. Hentges, J. Hill, D.V.M. Bishop, T. Goodacre, T. Moss, L. Murray The effect of cleft lip on cognitive development in school-aged children: a paradigm for examining sensitive period effects J Child Psychol Psychiat, 52 (2011), pp. 704-712,
dc.relation[32] S.A. Hillyard, E.K. Vogel, S.J. Luck Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence Philos T Roy Soc B, 353 (1373) (1998), pp. 1257-1270
dc.relation[33] R. Huffmeijer, M.J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, L.R.A. Alink, M.H. Van IJzendoorn Reliability of event-related potentials: the influence of number of trials and electrodes Physiol Behav, 130 (2014), pp. 13-22,
dc.relation[34] R. Huffmeijer, J. Eilander, V.R. Mileva-Seitz, R.C. Rippe Changes in face-specific neural processing explain reduced cuteness and approachability of infants with cleft lip Soc Neurosci, 13 (4) (2018), pp. 439-450,
dc.relation[35] T. Iidaka, A. Matsumoto, K. Haneda, T. Okada, N. Sadato Hemodynamic and electrophysiological relationship involved in human face processing: evidence from a combined fMRI-ERP study Brain Cogn, 60 (2006), pp. 176-186,
dc.relation[36] R.J. Itier, M.J. Taylor Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs NeuroImage, 15 (2002), pp. 353-372
dc.relation[37] C. Joyce, B. Rossion The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: the effect of reference electrode site Clin Neurophysiol, 116 (2005), pp. 2613-2631
dc.relation[38] Juffer, F., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J., & Van IJzendoorn, M.H. (2008). Promoting positive parenting: an attachment-based intervention. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.relation[39] D.A. Kenny, C.M. Judd Power anomalies in testing mediation Psychological Science, 25 (2) (2014), pp. 334-339,
dc.relation[40] Kienberger Jaudes, L. Mackey-Bilaver Do chronic conditions increase young children's risk of being maltreated? Child Abuse Neglect, 32 (2008), pp. 671-681,
dc.relation[41] J. Kohl, A.E. Autry, C. Dulac The neurobiology of parenting: a neural circuit perspective Bioessays, 39 (2016),
dc.relation[42] L. Kolijn, R. Huffmeijer, B.G. Van Den Bulk, C.I. Vrijhof, M.H. Van IJzendoorn, M.J. Bakermans-Kranenburg Effects of the Video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting and sensitive discipline on mothers’ neural responses to child faces: A randomized controlled ERP study including pre-and post-intervention measures Soc Neurosci (2019), pp. 1-15,
dc.relation[43] A. Korchounov, M.F. Meyer, M. Krasnianski Postsynaptic nigrostriatal dopamine receptors and their role in movement regulation J Neural Transm, 117 (12) (2010), pp. 1359-1369,
dc.relation[44] E. Kotsoni, G. Csibra, D. Mareschal, M.H. Johnson Electrophysiological correlates of common-onset visual masking Neuropsychologia, 45 (2007), pp. 2285-2293,
dc.relation[45] M.L. Kringelbach, E.A. Stark, C. Alexander, M.H. Bornstein, A. Stein On cuteness: unlocking the parental brain and beyond Trends Cogn Sci, 20 (7) (2016), pp. 545-558,
dc.relation[46] A. Krombholz, F. Schaefer, W. Boucsein Modification of N170 by different emotional expression of schematic faces Biological Psychology, 76 (2007), pp. 156-162
dc.relation[47] L.A. Leavitt Mothers’ sensitivity to infant signals Pediatrics, 102 (5) (1998), p. e1247,
dc.relation[48] L.A. Leavitt Research to practice: emotional development and maternal/infant attachment J Pediatr Health Car, 13 (3 Pt 2) (1999), pp. S4-S7,
dc.relation[49] E.M. Leerkes Predictors of Maternal Sensitivity to Infant Distress Parent-Sci Pract, 10 (3) (2010), pp. 219-239,
dc.relation[50] E. Leibenluft, M.I. Gobbini, T. Harrison, J.V. Haxby Mothers’ neural activation in response to pictures of their children and other children Biol Psychiat, 56 (4) (2004), pp. 225-232,
dc.relation[51] M. Li, R. Budin, A.S. Fleming, S. Kapur Effects of chronic typical and atypical antipsychotic drug treatment on maternal behavior in rats Schizophr Res, 75 (2-3) (2005), pp. 325-336,
dc.relation[52] M. Li, P. Davidson, R. Budin, S. Kapur, A.S. Fleming Effects of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on maternal behavior in postpartum female rats Schizophr Res, 70 (1) (2004), pp. 69-80,
dc.relation[53] J. Liggins, R.O. Pihl, C. Benkelfat, M. Leyton The dopamine augmenter L-DOPA does not affect positive mood in healthy human volunteers PLoS One, 7 (1) (2012), p. e28370,
dc.relation[54] J.P. Lorberbaum, J.D. Newman, A.R. Horwitz, J.R.J.R.J.R. Dubno, R.B.B. Lydiard, M.B. Hamner, M.S.M.S. … George A potential role for thalamocingulate circuitry in human maternal behavior Biol Psychiat, 51 (6) (2002), pp. 431-445,
dc.relation[55] K. Lorenz The innate forms of potential experience Z Tierpsychol, 5 (1943), pp. 235-409
dc.relation[56] S.J. Luck An introduction to the event-related potential technique MIT press. (2014)
dc.relation[57] W.B. Luo, W.F. Feng, W.Q. He, N.Y. Wang, Y.J. Luo Three stages of facial expression processing: ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation NeuroImage, 49 (2) (2010), pp. 1857-1867
dc.relation[58] J.H. Maunsell Neuronal representations of cognitive state: reward or attention? Trends Cogn Sci, 8 (6) (2004), pp. 261-265
dc.relation[59] V. Mileva-Seitz, A.S. Fleming, M.J. Meaney, A. Mastroianni, J.P. Sinnwell, M. Steiner, ..., M.B. Sokolowski Dopamine receptors D1 and D2 are related to observed maternal behavior Genes Brain Behav, 11 (6) (2012), pp. 684-694,
dc.relation[60] A.K. Montoya, A.F. Hayes Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: a path-analytic framework Psychol Meth (2016)
dc.relation[61] Mossey, P.A., & Catilla, E.E. (2003). Global registry and database on craniofacial anomalies: report of a WHO Registry Meeting on craniofacial anomalies.
dc.relation[62] P.A. Mossey, J. Little, R.G. Munger, M.J. Dixon, W.C. Shaw Cleft lip and palate Lancet, 374 (2009), pp. 1773-1785
dc.relation[63] L. Murray, F. Hentges, J. Hill, J. Karpf, B. Mistry, M. Kreutz, P. Woodall, T. Moss, T. Goodacre The effect of cleft lip and palate, and the timing of lip repair on mother-infant interactions and infant development J Child Psychol Psychiat, 49 (2008), pp. 115-123,
dc.relation[64] J.B. Nitschke, E.E. Nelson, B.D. Rusch, A.S. Fox, T.R. Oakes, R.J. Davidson Orbitofrontal cortex tracks positive mood in mothers viewing pictures of their newborn infants NeuroImage, 21 (2) (2004), pp. 583-592
dc.relation[65] M. Noriuchi, Y. Kikuchi, A. Senoo The functional neuroanatomy of maternal love: mother's response to infant's attachment behaviors Biol Psychiat, 63 (4) (2008), pp. 415-423
dc.relation[66] D.A. Norman, T. Shallice Attention to Action - Willed and Automatic-Control of Behavior Bull Psychonom Soc, 21 (5) (1983), p. 354
dc.relation[67] B. Noudoost, T. Moore The role of neuromodulators in selective attention Trends Cogn Sci, 15 (12) (2011), pp. 585-591,
dc.relation[68] M. Numan, M.J. Numan, N. Pliakou, D.S. Stolzenberg, O.J. Mullins, J.M. Murphy, C.D. Smith The effects of D1 or D2 dopamine receptor antagonism in the medial preoptic area, ventral pallidum, or nucleus accumbens on the maternal retrieval response and other aspects of maternal behavior in rats Behav Neurosci, 119 (6) (2005), pp. 1588-1604
dc.relation[69] N.Y. Oei, S.A. Rombouts, R.P. Soeter, J.M. Van Gerven, S. Both Dopamine modulates reward system activity during subconscious processing of sexual stimuli Neuropsychopharmacol, 37 (7) (2012), p. 1729,
dc.relation[70] I. Opris, C.J. Bruce Neural circuitry of judgment and decision mechanisms Brain Res Rev, 48 (3) (2005), pp. 509-526,
dc.relation[71] M. Parada, S. King, M. Li, A.S. Fleming The roles of accumbal dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in maternal memory in rats Behav Neurosci, 122 (2) (2008), pp. 368-376,
dc.relation[72] C.E. Parsons, K.S. Young, H. Mohseni, M.W. Woolrich, K Romer Thomsen, M Joensson, L. Murray, T Goodacre, A. Stein, M.L Kringelbach Minor structural abnormalities in the infant face disrupt neural processing: a unique window into early caregiving responses Soc Neurosci, 8 (4) (2013), pp. 268-274
dc.relation[73] C.E. Parsons, K.S. Young, E. Parsons, A. Dean, L. Murray, T. Goodacre, L. Dalton, A. Stein, M.L. Kringelbach The effect of cleft lip on adults’ responses to faces: cross-species findings PLoS one, 6 (10) (2011), p. e25897
dc.relation[74] C.J. Peck, D.C. Jangraw, M. Suzuki, R. Efem, J. Gottlieb Reward modulates attention independently of action value in posterior parietal cortex J Neurosci, 29 (36) (2009), pp. 11182-11191
dc.relation[75] S. Ranote, R. Elliott, K.M. Abel, R. Mitchell, J.F.W. Deakin, L. Appleby The neural basis of maternal responsiveness to infants: an fMRI study NeuroReport, 15 (11) (2004), pp. 1825-1829
dc.relation[76] H. Rayson, C.E. Parsons, K.S. Young, T. Goodacre, M.L. Kringelbach, J.J. Bonaiuto, E. McSorley, L. Murray Effects of infant cleft lip on adult gaze and perceptions of “cuteness” Cleft Palate-Cran J, 54 (5) (2017), pp. 562-570
dc.relation[77] J.K. Rilling, J.S. Mascaro The neurobiology of fatherhood Current Opinion in Psychology, 15 (2017), pp. 26-32
dc.relation[78] J.K. Rilling, L.J. Young The biology of mammalian parenting and its effect on offspring social development. science, 345 (6198) (2014), pp. 771-776
dc.relation[79] M.J. Rodrigo, I. León, I. Quiñones, A. Lage, S. Byrne, M.A. Bobes Brain and personality bases of insensitivity to infant cues in neglectful mothers: an event-related potential study Dev Psychopathol, 23 (2011), pp. 163-176
dc.relation[80] B. Rossion, C.A. Joyce, G.W. Cottrell, M.J. Tarr Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex NeuroImage, 20 (3) (2003), pp. 1609-1624
dc.relation[81] A.M. Rozendaal, A.D. Mohangoo, A.J.M. Luijsterburg, M.K. Bakker, E.M. Ongkusowito, Vermeij-Keers Prevalentie van schisis in Nederland en Noord-Nederland in 1997-2007: trendanalyse van gegevens uit drie Nederlandse registraties Tijdschrift voor Kindergeneeskunde, 79 (1) (2011), pp. 16-25
dc.relation[82] J.A. Rushby, R.J. Barry, S.J. Johnstone Event-related potential correlates of serial position effects during an elaborative memory test Int J Psychophysiol, 46 (1) (2002), pp. 13-27
dc.relation[83] H.J. Rutherford, A.N. Maupin, N. Landi, M.N. Potenza, L.C. Mayes Parental reflective functioning and the neural correlates of processing infant affective cues Soc Neurosci, 12 (5) (2017), pp. 519-529
dc.relation[84] N. Sagiv, S. Bentin Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: Holistic and part-based processes Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 (7) (2001), pp. 937-951
dc.relation[85] K. Sander, Y. Frome, H. Scheich FMRI activations of amygdala, cingulate cortex, and auditory cortex by infant laughing and crying Hum Brain Mapp, 28 (10) (2007), pp. 1007-1022
dc.relation[86] E. Seifritz, F. Esposito, J.G. Neuhoff, A. Lüthi, H. Mustovic, G. Dammann, G. Tedeschi Differential sex-independent amygdala response to infant crying and laughing in parents versus nonparents Biol Psychiat, 54 (12) (2003), pp. 1367-1375
dc.relation[87] B.E. Schmeichel, F.P. Zemlan, C.W. Berridge A selective dopamine reuptake inhibitor improves prefrontal cortex-dependent cognitive function: Potential relevance to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Neuropharmacol, 64 (2013), pp. 321-328
dc.relation[88] H. Schuiringa, M. Van Nieuwenhuijzen, B. Orobio de Castro, W. Matthys Parenting and the parent-child relationship in families of children with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities and externalizing behavior Res Dev Disabil, 36 (2015), pp. 1-12
dc.relation[89] J.K. Seamans, C.R. Yang The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex Prog Neurobiol, 74 (1) (2004), pp. 1-58
dc.relation[90] M.L. Speltz, M.C. Endriga, S. Hill, C.L. Maris, K. Jones, M.L. Omnell Cognitive and psychomotor development of infants with orofacial clefts J Ped Psychol, 25 (2000), pp. 185-190
dc.relation[91] R. Sprengelmeyer, I. Jentzsch Event related potentials and the perception of intensity in facial expressions Neuropsychologia, 44 (2006), pp. 2899-2906
dc.relation[92] R. Sprengelmeyer, D.I. Perrett, E.C. Fagan, R.E. Cornwell, J.S. Lobmaier, A. Sprengelmeyer, H.B.M. Aasheim, I.M. Black, L.M. Cameron, S. Crow, N. Milne, E.C. Rhodes, A.W. Young The cutest little baby face: a hormonal link to sensitivity to cuteness in infant faces Psychol Sci, 20 (2009), pp. 149-154
dc.relation[93] L. Strathearn, J. Li, P. Fonagy, P.R. Montague What's in a smile? Maternal brain responses to infant facial cues Pediatrics, 122 (1) (2008), pp. 40-51
dc.relation[94] P.M. Sullivan, J.F. Knutson Maltreatment and disabilities: a population-based epidemiological study Child Abuse Neglect, 24 (10) (2000), pp. 1257-1273
dc.relation[95] J.E. Swain Baby stimuli and the parent brain: functional neuroimaging of the neural substrates of parent-infant attachment Psychiat, 5 (8) (2008), pp. 28-36
dc.relation[96] D. Talsma, H.A. Slagter, S. Nieuwenhuis, J. Hage, A. Kok The orienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related brain potential study Cogn Brain Res, 25 (2005), pp. 117-129
dc.relation[97] L.T. Trujillo, J.M. Jankowitsch, J.H. Langlois Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14 (2014), pp. 1061-1076
dc.relation[98] S. Vijayraghavan, M. Wang, S.G. Birnbaum, G.V. Williams, A.F. Arnsten Inverted-U dopamine D1 receptor actions on prefrontal neurons engaged in working memory Nat Neurosci, 10 (3) (2007), p. 376
dc.relation[99] A. Voorthuis, D. Out, R. Van der Veen, R. Bhandari, M.H. Van IJzendoorn, M.J. Bakermans-Kranenburg One doll fits all: validation of the Leiden infant simulator sensitivity assessment (LISSA) Attach Hum Dev, 15 (2013), pp. 603-617
dc.relation[100] P. Vuilleumier How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention Trends Cogn Sci, 9 (12) (2005), pp. 585-594
dc.relation[101] L.M. Williams, D. Palmer, B.J. Liddell, L. Song, E. Gordon The ‘when’ and ‘where’ of perceiving signals of threat versus non-threat NeuroImage, 31 (2006), pp. 458-467
dc.relation[102] M.G. Woldorff, C.C. Gallen, S.A. Hampson, S.A. Hillyard, C. Pantev, D. Sobel, F.E. Bloom Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention P Natl Acad Sci USA, 90 (18) (1993), pp. 8722-8726
dc.relation[103] W. Wood, A.H. Eagly A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences Psychol Bull, 128 (5) (2002), pp. 699-727
dc.relation[104] R. Yamamoto, D. Ariely, W. Chi, D.D. Langleben, I. Elman Gender differences in the motivational processing of babies are determined by their facial attractiveness PloS One, 4 (2009), p. e6042
dc.relation[105] S Zhu, J Jayaraman, B Khambay Evaluation of facial appearance in patients with cleft lip and palate by laypeople and orofessionals: a systematic literature review Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 53 (2) (2016), pp. 187-196
dc.relation[106] Barrett, et al. Maternal affect and quality of parenting experiences are related to amygdala response to infant faces Social Neuroscience (2011),
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcePhysiology & Behavior
dc.sourcehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031938420302390#!
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectSchool
dc.subjectteachers
dc.subjectHeart rate variability
dc.subjectStress
dc.subjectAutonomic Modulation
dc.titleDifferences in the autonomic nervous system stress status of urban and rural school teachers
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución