The social role and procedural independence of the investigator in the criminal proceedings of the Russian federation

El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la federación de Rusia

dc.creatorEldarovna Adygezalova, Gyulnaz
dc.creatorMikhailovich Dolgov, Andrey
dc.creatorManaevich Lukozhev, Husen
dc.creatorValerievna Faroi, Tatyana
dc.creatorAleksandrovich Redkovskiy, Mikhail
dc.date2023-05-25T14:39:07Z
dc.date2023-05-25T14:39:07Z
dc.date2022-02-15
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T19:03:17Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T19:03:17Z
dc.identifierAdygezalova, G., Dolgov, A., Lukozhev, H., Faroi, T. & Redkovskiy, M. (2022). The social role and procedural independence of the investigator in the criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation. Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 217–240. DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.10
dc.identifier1692-3030
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/10183
dc.identifier10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.10
dc.identifier2389-7716
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifierREDICUC - Repositorio - CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9167191
dc.descriptionThe subject of the study is the social role and procedural independence of the investigator in the criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation as a key subject conducting criminal proceedings in the pre-trial stages. The authors consider the relationship between the investigator, the prosecutor, the head of the investigative body, the interrogator, and other participants in criminal proceedings, as well as problematic definitions and ensuring the procedural independence of the investigator. The methodology of research have been based on a set of general scientific methods and techniques used by legal science. According to the results of the study, the social role of the investigator in criminal proceedings has been determined, which is considered as one of the fundamental elements of his/her procedural independence. It has been concluded that the social role of the court and the investigator in the criminal process is comparable in terms of their defense of public interests and the importance of their participation in the implementation of criminal law. Therein, the court recognizes an exclusive function – the administration of justice. It has been noted that the absence of norms on the procedural independence of the investigator does not allow determining the place of the investigator in ensuring the balance of interests and mutual responsibility of the individual and the state, since the investigator can only be held liable as a representative of the state if he/she is independent in adopting them at his/her discretion
dc.descriptionEl tema central del estudio se encuentra constituido por el rol social y la independencia procesal que cumple el investigador en los procedimientos penales de la Federación de Rusia como un sujeto clave, que dirige los procedimientos penales en las etapas previas al juicio. Los autores examinan la relación entre el investigador, el fiscal, el jefe del organismo de investigación, el interrogador y otros participantes en el procedimiento penal frente a la independencia procesal para el investigador. La metodología de investigación utilizada se basa en la metodología jurídica dialéctica, formal lógica y comparativa. Como resultado del estudio, se pudo determinar el rol social del investigador en el procedimiento penal, el cual se considera como elemento fundamental de la independencia procesal. Se concluye que los roles sociales del tribunal y del investigador en el proceso penal son comparables en cuanto a la defensa de los intereses públicos y a la importancia de su participación en la aplicación de las normas del derecho penal. Al mismo tiempo, al tribunal se le reconoce una función exclusiva: la administración de justicia. Se destaca que el vacio normativo referente a la independencia procesal del investigador no permite determinar su rol social como garante del equilibrio de intereses y de la responsabilidad mutua entre el individuo y el Estado, ya que el investigador sólo puede ser considerado responsable como representante del Estado si es independiente al momento de proceder según su discreción
dc.format24 Páginas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.publisherColombia
dc.relationJurídicas CUC
dc.relationAdygezalova, G. E. (2017). Sociological jurisprudence of the United States in the 20th century: the formation of doctrine, the development and improvement of the rule of law. [Doctoral thesis]. Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia.
dc.relationAdygezalova, G. E. (2012). Sociological jurisprudence of the United States in the twentieth century: the formation of doctrine, the development and improvement of the rule of law. St. Petersburg: Legal-Press Centre.
dc.relationAdygezalova, G. E. (2008). Harmonization of the interests of the state, society and the individual (from the standpoint of American sociological jurisprudence and the realistic school of law). In, RGNF, State responsibility to the individual: the experience of history and the present: materials of the international conference, (pp. 132–142). Krasnodar: Kuban State University.
dc.relationAdygezalova, G. E., Faroi, T. V., Mikhel, D. E. & Lukozhev, H. M. (2020). Judicial debate in criminal proceedings as a way of expressing the interests of the parties to the conflict. Revista Inclusiones, 7(SI), 319–327. Available: https://revistainclusiones.org/index.php/inclu/article/view/322
dc.relationAustin, J. (1995). The province of jurisprudence determined. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
dc.relationBegiev, Kh. B. (2010a). Problems of ensuring the procedural independence of the investigator at the stage of the completion of the preliminary investigation. Society and law, 5(32), 194–200. Available from https://mvd.ru/upload/ site119/folder_page/003/467/465/sl-2010-5.pdf
dc.relationBegiev, Kh. B. (2010b). Implementation of the procedural independence of the investigator at the stage of initiating a criminal case in modern criminal proceedings in Russia. Society and law, 2(29), 206–212. Available from https:// mvd.ru/upload/site119/folder_page/003/467/465/sl-2010-2.pdf
dc.relationDenis, D. (1974). L’enquete preliminaire. Etude theorique et pratique. Paris: Police-revue. Federal Republic of Germany. (2019). Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/28/Germany/show
dc.relationFrench Republic. (2020). Criminal Code of Procedure of the French Republic. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislationline. org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/30/France/show
dc.relationGladysheva, O. V., Lukozhev, Kh. M. & Sementsov, V. A. (2013). Guarantees of the rights of participants in criminal proceedings: problems and possible solutions. Moscow: Yurlitinform.
dc.relationGredyagin, I. V. (2010). The concept and content of the procedural independence of the interrogator. Society and Law, 4(31), 252–255. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-i-soderzhanie-protsessualnoy-samostoyatelnostidoznavatelya
dc.relationGutnik, O. V. (2017). Institute for the independence of the court in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation. Russian Law, (4), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2017.125.4.067-073
dc.relationIering, R. (1881). Purpose in law. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of N.V. Muravyov.
dc.relationIvanov, A. L. (2010). Procurator’s protection of citizens’ constitutional rights. Legality, 9(911), 55–57.
dc.relationKachalova, O. V. (2014). Procedural independence of the investigator through the prism of his social function. Crime Investigation: problems and ways of their solutions, 4, 349–354.
dc.relationKhazhnagoev, A. Z. (2005). Procedural independence of the investigator and prosecutor’s supervision. Russian Agricultural Journal, 6, 12–14.
dc.relationKhoryakov, S. N. (2006). Procedural independence of the investigator. [Doctor thesis]. Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
dc.relationLapaeva, V. V. (2000). Sociology of law. Moscow: Norma-Infra-M.
dc.relationLloyd, D. & Freeman, M. (1979). Introduction to jurisprudence. London: Stevens & Sons.
dc.relationLukozhev, Kh. M. & Dolgov, A. M. (2018). Inquiry as a form of preliminary investigation. Moscow: Yurlitinform.
dc.relationMelnikov, V. Yu. (2008). Investigator and interrogator in criminal proceedings. Conflict processing, 4, 3–6.
dc.relationMelnikov, V. Yu. (2008). Procedural independence of the investigator as a guarantee of the protection of the rights and freedoms of the individual. Business Safety, 2, 6–12. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/protsessualnayasamostoyatelnost-sledovatelya-kak-garantiya-zaschitykonstitutsionnyh-prav-i-svobod-uchastnikov-ugolovnogo
dc.relationMotyleva, E. A. (2004). On the procedural independence of the investigator of the internal affairs bodies. Law and Justice, 4, 54–55.
dc.relationNersesyants, V. S. (1999). Philosophy of law: Textbook for universities. Moscow: Norma-Infra-M
dc.relationOgorodov, A. N. (2017). Procedural independence of an investigator in criminal proceedings. [Doctoral thesis]. University of Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation, Moscow,Russia.
dc.relationOlisov, R. Yu. (2006). The ratio of the procedural independence of the investigator and prosecutor’s supervision in domestic pre-trial proceedings. [Doctoral Thesis]. N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod National Research, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia.
dc.relationPopova, T. Yu. (2010). Influence of remedial and administrative powers of the head of investigatory body on realization of procedural independence of the investigato. Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1(12), 161–165. Available from https://media.mvd.ru/files/application/1000854
dc.relationPound, R. (1945a). An introduction to the philosophy of law. New Haven/London: Yale University Press/Humphrey MilfordOxford University Press.
dc.relationPound, R. (1945b). Criminal justice in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relationPound, R. (1942). Social control through law. New Haven/ London: Yale University Press/Humphrey Milford-Oxford University Press.
dc.relationPrusak, F. (1984). Prosecutor's supervision over preparatory proceedings. Warszawa: Legal Editorial.
dc.relationRF. State Duma. (2020). Constitution of the Russian Federation.[Online]. Available: http://www.constitution.ru/
dc.relationRF. State Duma. (November 22, 2001). The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. [УПК РФ]. Federal Law No. 174-FZ. Available: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901802257
dc.relationRepublic or Poland. (2003). Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Poland. [Online]. Available:https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/10/Poland/show
dc.relationRomashov, R. A. & Nizhnik, N. S. (Eds.) (2005). State, society, personality: compatibility problems. Moscow: Yuurist.
dc.relationSchroeder, F. C. (2014). Strafprozessrecht. München: C. H. Beck.
dc.relationSementsov, V. A. (2017). Investigative actions in pre-trial proceedings (general provisions of theory and practice). Moscow: Yurlitinform.
dc.relationSidorenko, M. V. (2018). Legal certainty of Russian criminal procedure law. [Doctoral thesis]. Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
dc.relationSidorenko, M. V. (2017). Legal certainty of the Russian criminal procedural law (state and formulation of the problem). Moscow: Yurlitinform.
dc.relationSoyer, J.-Cl. (1992). Droit penal et procedure penale. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.
dc.relationZhidkov, O. A. (Ed.) (1999). Anthology of world legal thought: In 5 volumes. [Vol. 3. Europe. America: 17th–20th centuries].Moscow: Mysl
dc.relation240
dc.relation217
dc.relation1
dc.relation18
dc.rights© The author; licensee Universidad de la Costa - CUC
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcehttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/3669
dc.subjectThe balance of interests
dc.subjectProcedural status
dc.subjectPowers
dc.subjectInvestigative body
dc.subjectLegal certainty
dc.subjectEquilibrio de intereses
dc.subjectEstado procesal
dc.subjectPoderes
dc.subjectOrganismo de investigación
dc.subjectSeguridad jurídica
dc.titleThe social role and procedural independence of the investigator in the criminal proceedings of the Russian federation
dc.titleEl rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la federación de Rusia
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.coverageRusia


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución