A SYSTEMATIC REPLICATION OF SKINNER (1938) USING A HOT AIR BLAST AS THE PUNISHER

dc.contributoren-US
dc.contributorpt-BR
dc.creatorMayer, Paulo César Morales
dc.creatorde Carvalho Neto, Marcus Bentes
dc.date2017-05-23
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-28T14:54:53Z
dc.date.available2023-09-28T14:54:53Z
dc.identifierhttps://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/rebac/article/view/4405
dc.identifier10.18542/rebac.v12i2.4405
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9006050
dc.descriptionThe present study was a systematic replication of the classic study by Skinner (1938) using a hot air blast (HAB) as the punisher. After lever press training, six rats underwent two extinction sessions. During the initial 10 min of extinction in the first session, half of the subjects received a HAB for every lever press (punishment). Subjects that received punishment made fewer lever presses during first extinction session, but the total number of responses in both groups was equivalent by the end of the second extinction session. The present data corroborate the findings of Skinner (1938) that the punishment may have partial and temporary effects in certain contexts. We discuss the ways in which the elicitation of competitive responses, the intensity and nature of the stimulus, and the duration of exposure to the aversive contingency are important factors that may explain the divergent results in the literature.Keywords: punishment, replication, competitive responses, suppression, rats, hot air blasten-US
dc.descriptionThe present study was a systematic replication of the classic study by Skinner (1938) using a hot air blast (HAB) as the punisher. After lever press training, six rats underwent two extinction sessions. During the initial 10 min of extinction in the first session, half of the subjects received a HAB for every lever press (punishment). Subjects that received punishment made fewer lever presses during first extinction session, but the total number of responses in both groups was equivalent by the end of the second extinction session. The present data corroborate the findings of Skinner (1938) that the punishment may have partial and temporary effects in certain contexts. We discuss the ways in which the elicitation of competitive responses, the intensity and nature of the stimulus, and the duration of exposure to the aversive contingency are important factors that may explain the divergent results in the literature.Keywords: punishment, replication, competitive responses, suppression, rats, hot air blastpt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal do Parápt-BR
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/rebac/article/view/4405/4199
dc.rightsDireitos autorais 2017 Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamentopt-BR
dc.sourceBJBA - Brazilian Journal of Behavior Analysis; v. 12, n. 2 (2016)en-US
dc.sourceRevista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento; v. 12, n. 2 (2016)pt-BR
dc.source2526-6551
dc.source1807-8338
dc.titleA SYSTEMATIC REPLICATION OF SKINNER (1938) USING A HOT AIR BLAST AS THE PUNISHERen-US
dc.titleA SYSTEMATIC REPLICATION OF SKINNER (1938) USING A HOT AIR BLAST AS THE PUNISHERpt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typept-BR
dc.typeen-US


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución