Preliminary survey on cold fusion

dc.creatorFREIRE, LUCIANO O.
dc.creatorANDRADE, DELVONEI A. de
dc.date2021
dc.date2022-03-14T17:41:25Z
dc.date2022-03-14T17:41:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-28T14:21:21Z
dc.date.available2023-09-28T14:21:21Z
dc.identifier1572-6657
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/32788
dc.identifier903
dc.identifier10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115871
dc.identifier0000-0002-6689-3011
dc.identifier65.72
dc.identifier76.33
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9003007
dc.descriptionSince 1989 the announcement of ???cold fusion??? by Stanley Pons and Martin Fleishmann, ???cold fusion??? field has been surrounded by controversy. After three decades, this field is alive and has produced thousands of publications, most in dedicated periodic and conferences. This work aims at checking whether ???cold fusion??? fits in pathological science traits. For each type of experiment and year, this work counted the distinct research groups results (success or failure). Experimental results from many research groups suggest that nuclear reactions in solids are more complex than fusion (it is not only fusion) and that they need energy triggers like background radiation, meaning chemical configurations alone do not seem to generate nuclear reactions. Some types of experiments present rising trends (the field does not fit in pathological science model) and have potential to bring disruptive technologies. If confirmed, experimental results will require revisions of accepted nuclear models.
dc.format1-10
dc.relationJournal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectcold fusion
dc.subjectnuclear reactions
dc.subjectpathology
dc.subjectconfinement
dc.subjectcavitation
dc.titlePreliminary survey on cold fusion
dc.typeArtigo de peri??dico
dc.coverageI


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución