dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorChen, Chiung-Fen
dc.creatorHu, Jan Ching Chun
dc.creatorEstrella, Maria Regina Padilla
dc.creatorPeters, Mathilde C.
dc.creatorBresciani, Eduardo
dc.date2014-05-27T11:29:54Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:50:52Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:29:54Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:50:52Z
dc.date2013-07-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T02:30:03Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T02:30:03Z
dc.identifierPediatric Dentistry, v. 35, n. 4, p. 337-342, 2013.
dc.identifier0164-1263
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/75886
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/75886
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84883227151
dc.identifierhttp://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aapd/pd/2013/00000035/00000004/art00007
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/896612
dc.descriptionPurpose: The purpose of this study was to assess restorative treatment outcomes in the mixed dentition of amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) patients and determine the postrehabilitation oral health status and satisfaction of the patients. Methods: Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed on eight AI patients, who had 74 restorations placed in permanent incisors and molars, to allow evaluation of the integrity of the restorations and periodontal status post-treatment. Subjects completed a survey regarding esthetics, function, and sensitivity. Results: Among the 74 restorations evaluated, seven were lost; of the remaining restorations, 31 were posterior, and 36 were anterior. Ten were rated clinically unacceptable. Teeth with stainless steel crowns had a moderate gingival index (mean=2.3) and plaque index (mean=2.0) scores. Widening of the periodontal ligament and pulp canal obliteration were common radiographic findings. Subject's recall of satisfaction regarding esthetics (P=.002) and sensitivity (brushing-P=.03; eating-P=.01) showed a statically significant difference before and after treatment. Conclusions: During mixed dentition, teeth with amelogenesis imperfecta may be restored with conventional treatment modalities. Direct restorations should be considered interim with multiple repairs anticipated. Post-treatment, gingival inflammation and plaque accumulation were observed. Subjects were satisfied with their appearance and reported a decrease of hypersensitivity. © 2013 Publishing Technology.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationPediatric Dentistry
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectMixed dentition
dc.subjectOral health
dc.subjectRestorative treatment
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.titleAssessment of restorative treatment of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución