dc.creatorPylro, Victor Satler
dc.creatorMorais, Daniel Kumazawa
dc.creatorKalks, Karlos Henrique Martins
dc.creatorRoesch, Luiz Fernando Wurdig
dc.creatorHirsch, Penny R.
dc.creatorTótola, Marcos Rogério
dc.creatorYotoko, Karla
dc.date2018-05-02T13:21:29Z
dc.date2018-05-02T13:21:29Z
dc.date2016-04-22
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T21:19:51Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T21:19:51Z
dc.identifier01677012
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.04.012
dc.identifierhttp://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/19237
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8958786
dc.descriptionControversy surrounding bacterial phylogenies has become one of the most important challenges for microbial ecology. Comparative analyses with nucleotide databases and phylogenetic reconstruction of the amplified 16S rRNA genes from DGGE (Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis) excised bands have been used by several researchers for the identification of organisms in complex samples. Here, we individually analyzed DGGE-excised 16S rRNA gene bands from 10 certified bacterial strains of different species, and demonstrated that this kind of approach can deliver erroneous outcomes to researchers, besides causing/emphasizing errors in public databases.
dc.formatpdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherJournal of Microbiological Methods
dc.relationv. 126, p. 18-23, July 2016
dc.rightsElsevier B.V.
dc.subject16S rRNA gene
dc.subjectPCR-DGGE bacteria phylogeny
dc.subjectPublic databases
dc.titleMisguided phylogenetic comparisons using DGGE excised bands may contaminate public sequence databases
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución