dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorCoelho-Ravagnani, Christianne de Faria
dc.creatorLemos Melo, Flávia Carolina
dc.creatorRavagnani, Fabricio C.P.
dc.creatorPaganini Burini, Franz Homero
dc.creatorBurini, Roberto Carlos
dc.date2014-05-27T11:28:36Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:45:08Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:28:36Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:45:08Z
dc.date2013-03-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T02:15:46Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T02:15:46Z
dc.identifierRevista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, v. 19, n. 2, p. 134-138, 2013.
dc.identifier1517-8692
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74744
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74744
dc.identifier10.1590/S1517-86922013000200013
dc.identifierS1517-86922013000200013
dc.identifierWOS:000320007100013
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84878783691.pdf
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84878783691
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-86922013000200013
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/895504
dc.descriptionObjective: This study aimed to determine the energy expenditure (EE) in terms of caloric cost and metabolic equivalents (METs) of two sessions of an exercise protocol. Methods: Fifteen subjects (51.0 ± 5.5years) performed the exercise sessions (80min), which were composed by (warming, walking and flexibility exercises; Session A) and (warming, walking and local muscular endurance exercises; Session B). Heart hate (HR) was measured during each part of the sessions. In laboratory environment, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) and oxygen uptake in rest and exercise conditions (using mean HR obtained in classes) were measured on different days, using indirect calorimetry. Exercise METs were obtained by dividing VO2 in exercise (mL.kg-1.min-1) by VO2 in rest (mL.kg-1.min-1). The EE of the exercises was calculated by the formula: MET x Weight(kg) x Time(min)/60. The results were analyzed by ANOVA with Tuckey post hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: One MET for this group was 2.7 ± 0.1mL.kg-1.min-1. The mean METs of exercises were 4,7 ± 0,8 (warming), 5,8 ± 0,9 (walking) and 3,6 ± 0,7 (flexibility) on session A, and 4,6 ± 1,2 (warming), 5,6 ± 1,0 (walking) and 4.8 ± 1,0 (local muscular endurance exercises) on Session B. The training sessions showed similar energy cost (A: 398 ± 86.72 kcal and B: 404 ± 38.85 kcal; p > 0,05). None of activities were classified into vigorous intensity (> 7 METs). There were no differences on VO2 between walking (15,6 ± 2,8 or 15,4 ± 2,6 mL.kg-1.min-1) and local muscular endurance exercises (13,2 ± 2,9 mL.kg-1.min-1), although both were higher (p > 0.05) than flexibility exercises (10.1 ± 2.2 mL.kg-1.min-1). Conclusion: The proposed protocol achieves the physical activity needed by healthy adults to improve and maintain health, by their structure, moderate intensity, duration, frequency and caloric expenditure.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationRevista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectEnergy expenditure
dc.subjectExercise
dc.subjectMET
dc.titleEstimation of the metabolic equivalent (MET) of an exercise protocol based on indirect calorimetry
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución