dc.creatorCampos, Mateus R.
dc.creatorPicanço, Marcelo Coutinho
dc.creatorMartins, Júlio Cláudio
dc.creatorTomaz, Adriano Cirino
dc.creatorGuedes, Raul Narciso C.
dc.date2018-10-17T10:25:13Z
dc.date2018-10-17T10:25:13Z
dc.date2011-09-24
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T21:03:02Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T21:03:02Z
dc.identifier0261-2194
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.08.013
dc.identifierhttp://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/22299
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8953558
dc.descriptionInsecticide lethal and sub-lethal effects on non-target species are a focus in pest management programs. However, such studies are usually centered in relatively few groups of natural enemies of insect pests. Earwigs, although insect pest predators of key importance in Neotropical maize fields, have received very little attention. The earwig Doru luteipes (Sccuder) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) is one of the main predators of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Both species were subjected to toxicity and selectivity studies with the insecticides chlorantraniliprole, chlorfenapyr, chlorpyrifos, λ-cyhalothrin, deltamethrin, etofenprox, methomyl and spinosad. The behavioral locomotory response of D. luteipes to these compounds was also assessed. Concentration-response bioassays indicated very low potency of chlorantraniliprole (>550,000× less toxic), followed by spinosad (>3,500× less toxic) and etofenprox (>1,100× less toxic) as compared to chlorpyrifos, the most toxic insecticide studied against this earwig species. These same three compounds exhibited the highest selectivity when comparing the earwig with its prey, the fall armyworm. Time-response bioassays using the insecticide label rates recommended against the fall armyworm confirmed the high selectivity of chlorantraniliprole and etofenprox, in addition to deltamethrin and methomyl. Again chlorpyrifos exhibited the lowest levels of selectivity. Exposure of the earwig to insecticide-treated surfaces indicated that spinosad reduced the locomotory activity of the adults probably increasing their insecticide exposure, while they avoided chlorfenapyr-, etofenprox-, and chlorpyrifos-treated surfaces. Chlorantraniliprole and etofenprox seem the most promising compounds for use against S. frugiperda whilst preserving populations of D. luteipes.
dc.formatpdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherCrop Protection
dc.relationVolume 30, Issue 12, Pages 1535-1540, December 2011
dc.rightsElsevier B. V.
dc.subjectBiocontrol agent
dc.subjectFall armyworm
dc.subjectInsecticide toxicity
dc.subjectNon-target impact
dc.subjectInsecticide side-effects
dc.subjectPredator
dc.titleInsecticide selectivity and behavioral response of the earwig Doru luteipes
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución