Comparative Analysis of 2 Techniques of Double-Gloving Protection During Arch Bar Placement for Intermaxillary Fixation

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorGaujac, Cristiano
dc.creatorCeccheti, Marcelo M.
dc.creatorYonezaki, Frederico
dc.creatorGarcia Júnior, Idelmo Rangel
dc.creatorPeres, Maria Paula S. M.
dc.date2014-05-27T11:22:36Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:24:22Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:22:36Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:24:22Z
dc.date2007-10-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T01:26:40Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T01:26:40Z
dc.identifierJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 65, n. 10, p. 1922-1925, 2007.
dc.identifier0278-2391
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69900
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69900
dc.identifier10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.311
dc.identifierWOS:000249939000003
dc.identifier2-s2.0-34548681007
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.311
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/891074
dc.descriptionPurpose: This study was conducted to comparatively evaluate, in a prospective and randomized manner, 2 techniques for providing double-gloving protection during arch bar placement for intermaxillary fixation. Materials and Methods: A total of 42 consecutive patients in whom application of an Erich bar was indicated for intermaxillary fixation were equally divided into 2 groups. In group 1, 2 sterile surgical gloves were used; in group 2, a nonsterile disposable inner glove was used under a sterile surgical glove. Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and binomial statistical tests were used to analyze the findings. Results: A total of 103 perforations were found in the outer gloves (47 in group 1 and 56 in group 2), along with 5 perforations in inner gloves in both groups (α = .01). No significant statistical difference was found between groups in terms of inner glove perforations (α = .05). The nondominant hand presented with 70.9% of the perforations, statistically significant to 1%. Conclusions: Both double-gloving techniques were found to provide effective clinician protection. The use of a nonsterile disposable glove under the surgical glove is possible for less-invasive procedures, offering the same safety as using 2 sterile surgical gloves while decreasing operational costs. This method does not eliminate the need to change gloves when a perforation is suspected or noted during the surgery, however. © 2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectalveolar bone
dc.subjectarch bar placement
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial
dc.subjectcost control
dc.subjectdisposable equipment
dc.subjectdouble gloving technique
dc.subjectequipment design
dc.subjectglove perforation
dc.subjectiatrogenic disease
dc.subjectinstrument sterilization
dc.subjectintermaxillary fixation
dc.subjectminimally invasive surgery
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectprotective equipment
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectstatistical analysis
dc.subjectsurgical glove
dc.subjectsurgical technique
dc.subjectDisease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional
dc.subjectDisease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient
dc.subjectEquipment Failure
dc.subjectFracture Fixation, Internal
dc.subjectGloves, Surgical
dc.subjectInfection Control
dc.subjectMaxilla
dc.subjectMotor Skills
dc.subjectOral Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric
dc.subjectWounds, Stab
dc.titleComparative Analysis of 2 Techniques of Double-Gloving Protection During Arch Bar Placement for Intermaxillary Fixation
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución