Electromyographyc evaluation of movements of lower limb in double pulley system equipment: Comparison between gastrocnemius (caput laterale) and gluteus maximus

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorTassi, Nadir
dc.creatorValenti, Vitor Engrácia
dc.date2014-05-27T11:22:35Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:24:17Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:22:35Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:24:17Z
dc.date2007-09-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T01:26:26Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T01:26:26Z
dc.identifierElectromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, v. 47, n. 6, p. 293-299, 2007.
dc.identifier0301-150X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69872
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69872
dc.identifier2-s2.0-34548802517
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/891049
dc.descriptionIt was evaluated movements of lower limb in the double pulley system equipment on ten male volunteers during contraction of gastrocnemius (caput laterale ) and gluteus maximus muscles in the following movements: 1) hip extension with extended knee and erect trunk, 2) hip extension with flexed knee and erect trunk, 3) hip extension with flexed knee and erect trunk, 3) hip extension with extended knee and inclined trunk, 5) hip abduction along the midline, 7) hip abduction with extension beyond the midline, 8) adduction with hip flexion beyond the midline, 8) adduction with hip flexion beyond the midline, and 9) adduction with hip extension beyond the midline. Myoelectric signals were taken up by Lec Tec surface electrodes connected to a 6-channel Lynx electromyographic signal amplifier coupled with a computer equipped with a model CAD 10/26 analogue digital conversion board and with a specific software for signal recording and analysis. We observed weak gastrocnemius muscle activity for all movements studied. In the case of gluteus maximus, the most important potentials were observed for movement 2, while for the remaining movements the actions were of reasonable intensity. Compared to gluteus, gastrocnemius was less required for all movements.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationElectromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectDouble pulley
dc.subjectElectromyography
dc.subjectGastrocnemius
dc.subjectGluteus Maximus
dc.subjectabduction
dc.subjectadduction
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectelectrode
dc.subjectelectromyography
dc.subjectgastrocnemius muscle
dc.subjectgluteus maximus muscle
dc.subjecthip
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthuman experiment
dc.subjectkinesiology
dc.subjectknee function
dc.subjectlimb movement
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmuscle action potential
dc.subjectmuscle contraction
dc.subjectmyoelectricity
dc.subjectnormal human
dc.subjectweight lifting
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectExercise Test
dc.subjectHip Joint
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectKnee Joint
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMovement
dc.subjectMuscle Contraction
dc.subjectMuscle, Skeletal
dc.subjectRange of Motion, Articular
dc.titleElectromyographyc evaluation of movements of lower limb in double pulley system equipment: Comparison between gastrocnemius (caput laterale) and gluteus maximus
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución