dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorSaavedra, Guilherme
dc.creatorValandro, Luiz Felipe
dc.creatorLeite, Fabiola Pessoa Pereira
dc.creatorAmaral, Regina
dc.creatorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.creatorBottino, Marco A.
dc.creatorKimpara, Estevão Tomomitsu
dc.date2014-05-27T11:22:26Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:23:40Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:22:26Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:23:40Z
dc.date2007-03-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T01:24:08Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T01:24:08Z
dc.identifierInternational Journal of Prosthodontics, v. 20, n. 2, p. 199-201, 2007.
dc.identifier0893-2174
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69573
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69573
dc.identifierWOS:000245169300020
dc.identifier2-s2.0-34047234385
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/ijp/abstract.php?article_id=2680
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/890798
dc.descriptionThis study aimed to evaluate the durability of adhesion between acrylic teeth and denture base acrylic resin. The base surfaces of 24 acrylic teeth were flatted and submitted to 4 surface treatment methods: SM1 (control): No SM; SM2: application of a methyl methacrylate-based bonding agent (Vitacol); SM3: air abrasion with 30-μm silicone oxide plus silane; SM4: SM3 plus SM2. A heat-polymerized acrylic resin was applied to the teeth. Thereafter, bar specimens were produced for the microtensile test at dry and thermocyled conditions (60 days water storage followed by 12,000 cycles). The results showed that bond strength was significantly affected by the SM (P < .0001) (SM4 = SM2 > SM3 > SM1) and storage regimens (P < .0001) (dry > thermocycled). The methyl methacrylate-based adhesive showed the highest bond strength.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationInternational Journal of Prosthodontics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectacrylic acid resin
dc.subjectaluminum oxide
dc.subjectbiomedical and dental materials
dc.subjectLucitone
dc.subjectmethacrylic acid methyl ester
dc.subjectsilane derivative
dc.subjectsilicon dioxide
dc.subjectunclassified drug
dc.subjectwater
dc.subjectchemistry
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdental bonding
dc.subjectdental surgery
dc.subjectdenture
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmaterials testing
dc.subjectmechanical stress
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectreview
dc.subjectsurface property
dc.subjecttemperature
dc.subjecttensile strength
dc.subjecttooth brushing
dc.subjecttooth prosthesis
dc.subjectAcrylic Resins
dc.subjectAir Abrasion, Dental
dc.subjectAluminum Oxide
dc.subjectDental Bonding
dc.subjectDental Materials
dc.subjectDental Polishing
dc.subjectDenture Bases
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectMethylmethacrylate
dc.subjectSilanes
dc.subjectSilicon Dioxide
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical
dc.subjectSurface Properties
dc.subjectTemperature
dc.subjectTensile Strength
dc.subjectTooth, Artificial
dc.subjectWater
dc.titleBond strength of acrylic teeth to denture base resin after various surface conditioning methods before and after thermocycling
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución