dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorPavan, Sabrina
dc.creatorArioli Filho, João Neudenir
dc.creatorSantos, Paulo Henrique dos
dc.creatorNogueira, Sergio Sualdini
dc.creatorBatista, André Ulisses Dantas
dc.date2014-05-27T11:22:25Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:23:36Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:22:25Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:23:36Z
dc.date2007-03-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T01:23:54Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T01:23:54Z
dc.identifierJournal of Prosthodontics, v. 16, n. 2, p. 101-106, 2007.
dc.identifier1059-941X
dc.identifier1532-849X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69541
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69541
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00162.x
dc.identifier2-s2.0-33947238827
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00162.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/890771
dc.descriptionPurpose: To evaluate the effects of disinfection treatments with chemical solutions (2% glutaraldehyde, 5% sodium hypochlorite, and 5% chlorhexidine) and microwave energy on the hardness of four long-term soft denture liners. Materials and Methods: Forty rectangular specimens of four soft lining materials (Molloplast-B, Ufi Gel P, Eversoft, and Mucopren soft) were made for each material. Ten samples of each material were immersed in different disinfectant solutions for 10 minutes or placed in a microwave oven for 3 minutes at 500 W. The hardness values were obtained with a Shore A durometer, before the first disinfection cycle (control), and also after two cycles of disinfection. Data were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey's test (p < 0.01). Results: The highest value of hardness was obtained for Molloplast-B, independent of the disinfection technique. Mucopren soft demonstrated intermediate values and Ufi Gel P and Eversoft the lowest values of Shore A hardness. For Molloplast-B, the disinfection using glutaraldehyde demonstrated the highest value of hardness. The number of disinfections had no effect on the hardness values for all the materials studied and disinfection techniques. Conclusions: The application of two disinfection cycles did not change the Shore A hardness values for all the materials. The glutaraldehyde solution demonstrated the highest values of Shore A hardness for the Molloplast-B, Mucopren soft, and Ufi Gel P materials, while Eversoft did not present any differences in hardness when submitted to different disinfection treatments. Copyright © 2007 by The American College of Prosthodontists.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Prosthodontics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectDisinfection
dc.subjectHardness
dc.subjectSoft liner material
dc.subjectdenture
dc.subjectdisinfection
dc.subjectdrug effect
dc.subjecthardness
dc.subjectmicrowave radiation
dc.subjectradiation exposure
dc.subjectDenture Liners
dc.subjectMicrowaves
dc.titleEffect of disinfection treatments on the hardness of soft denture liner materials
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución