dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorUrban, Vanessa Migliorini
dc.creatorDe Souza, Raphael Freitas
dc.creatorGalvao Arrais, Cesar Augusto
dc.creatorBorsato, Karina Tostes
dc.creatorVaz, Luis Geraldo
dc.date2014-05-27T11:21:57Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:22:36Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:21:57Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:22:36Z
dc.date2006-09-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T01:20:11Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T01:20:11Z
dc.identifierJournal of Prosthodontics, v. 15, n. 5, p. 295-299, 2006.
dc.identifier1059-941X
dc.identifier1532-849X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69059
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69059
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00130.x
dc.identifier2-s2.0-33748373174
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00130.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/890353
dc.descriptionPurpose: This study evaluated the ultimate tensile strength of a tissue conditioner without nystatin incorporation (GI - control group) and the same tissue conditioner modified by the addition of nystatin in two concentrations: GII - 500,000 International Units (U) and GIII - 1,000,000 U, in which each milligram of the medicament corresponded to 6079 U. Materials and Methods: Dumbbell-shaped specimens (N = 7) with a central cross-sectional area of 33 × 6 × 3 mm were produced for the three experimental groups. After polymerization following manufacturer's instructions, specimens were immersed in distilled water at 37°C for either 24 hours or 7 days and then tested in tension in the MTS 810 at 40 mm/minute. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test, at 95% level of confidence. Results: The means (force-grams (gf) ± standard deviation) of the ultimate tensile strength were: GI - 634.29 ± 122.80; GII - 561.92 ± 133.56; and GIII - 547.30 ± 73.47 for 24-hour storage, and GI - 536.68 ± 54.71; GII - 467.50 ± 143.51; and GIII - 500.62 ± 159.76 for 7-day storage. There were no statistically significant differences among the three experimental groups (p > 0.05). The ultimate tensile strength means of all experimental groups after 7 days were significantly lower than those observed after 24 hours (p = 0.04). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the addition of nystatin into the tissue conditioner investigated in concentrations below 1,000,000 U did not affect its ultimate tensile strength. Copyright © 2006 by The American College of Prosthodontists.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Prosthodontics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAntifungal agent
dc.subjectCandida albicans
dc.subjectDenture stomatitis
dc.subjectUTS
dc.subjectalcohol
dc.subjectantifungal agent
dc.subjectmethacrylic acid methyl ester
dc.subjectnystatin
dc.subjectphthalic acid dibutyl ester
dc.subjectplasticizer
dc.subjectanalysis of variance
dc.subjectdental care
dc.subjectdenture
dc.subjectdrug storage
dc.subjectmaterials testing
dc.subjectreparative dentistry
dc.subjectstomatitis
dc.subjecttensile strength
dc.subjectthrush
dc.subjecttime
dc.subjectAnalysis of Variance
dc.subjectAntifungal Agents
dc.subjectCandidiasis, Oral
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectDenture Liners
dc.subjectDibutyl Phthalate
dc.subjectDrug Storage
dc.subjectEthanol
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectMethylmethacrylate
dc.subjectNystatin
dc.subjectPlasticizers
dc.subjectStomatitis, Denture
dc.subjectTensile Strength
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectTissue Conditioning (Dental)
dc.titleEffect of the association of nystatin with a tissue conditioner on its ultimate tensile strength
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución