dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorJúnior, Walberto Santana Passos
dc.creatorManetti, Luciana Débora
dc.creatorSchellini, Silvana Artioli
dc.creatorPadovani, Carlos Roberto
dc.creatorPadovani, Carlos Roberto
dc.date2014-05-27T11:21:45Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:21:42Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:21:45Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:21:42Z
dc.date2005-12-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T01:16:50Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T01:16:50Z
dc.identifierRevista Brasileira de Oftalmologia, v. 64, n. 6, p. 371-375, 2005.
dc.identifier0034-7280
dc.identifier1982-8551
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68665
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68665
dc.identifier2-s2.0-74349123512.pdf
dc.identifier2-s2.0-74349123512
dc.identifierhttp://www.sboportal.org.br/rbo/2005/rbo_nov_dez_2005.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/889988
dc.descriptionPurpose: To show the importance of the cicloplegic method in the refraction evaluation comparing the automated refraction (subjective and objective) and the subjective static refraction. Method: One-hundred patients (200 eyes) between 5 and 40 years were prospectivelly evaluated according the static and dynamic automated refraction and the subjective static refraction, using an automated refractor Nidek ARK - 900. The data were submitted to statical evaluation. Results: The concordance indices were better after cycloplegia mainly in relation of the spheric degree and cílindric axes. Conclusion: Cycloplegia is very important to have accurace in the automated refraction in patients before 40 year-old.
dc.languagepor
dc.relationRevista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCyclopentolate
dc.subjectRefraction, ocular/physiology
dc.subjectRefractive errors/diagnosis
dc.titleEfeito cicloplégico na refração automatizada
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución