Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorÁvila Galhano, Graziela
dc.creatorValandro, Luiz Felipe
dc.creatorMarques de Melo, Renata
dc.creatorScotti, Roberto
dc.creatorBottino, Marco Antonio
dc.date2014-05-27T11:21:17Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:20:31Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:21:17Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:20:31Z
dc.date2005-03-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T01:12:33Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T01:12:33Z
dc.identifierJournal of Endodontics, v. 31, n. 3, p. 209-211, 2005.
dc.identifier0099-2399
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68143
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68143
dc.identifier10.1097/01.don.0000137652.49748.0c
dc.identifierWOS:000227460500013
dc.identifier2-s2.0-14944341661
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000137652.49748.0c
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/889521
dc.descriptionThis study investigated the flexural strength of eight fiber posts (one carbon fiber, one carbon/quartz fiber, one opaque quartz fiber, two translucent quartz fiber, and three glass fiber posts). Eighty fiber posts were used and divided into eight groups (n = 10): G1: C-POST (Bisco); G2: ÆSTHETI-POST (Bisco); G3: ÆSTHETI-PLUS (Bisco); G4: LIGHT-POST (Bisco); G5: D.T. LIGHT-POST (Bisco); G6: PARAPOST WHITE (Coltene); G7: FIBERKOR (Pentron); G8: REFORPOST (Angelus). All of the samples were tested using the three-point bending test. The averages obtained were submitted to the ANOVA and to Tukey's test (p < 0.05). The mean values (MPa) of the groups ÆSTHETI-POST - carbon/ quartz fiber post (Bisco) and ÆSTHETI-PLUS - quartz fiber post (Bisco) were statistically similar and higher than the mean values of the other groups. The mean values of the groups C-POST - carbon fiber post (Bisco), LIGHT-POST - translucent quartz fiber post (Bisco), D.T. LIGHT-POST - double tapered translucent quartz fiber post (Bisco), PARAPOST WHITE - glass fiber post (Coltene) and FIBREKOR - glass fiber post (Pentron) were similar and higher than the group REFORPOST - glass fiber post (Angelus). Copyright © 2005 by the American Association of Endodontists.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Endodontics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectcarbon fiber
dc.subjectglass fiber
dc.subjectsilicon dioxide
dc.subjectanalysis of variance
dc.subjectmaterials testing
dc.subjectmechanics
dc.subjectvalidation process
dc.subjectAnalysis of Variance
dc.subjectCarbon
dc.subjectComposite Resins
dc.subjectDental Materials
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectElasticity
dc.subjectGlass
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning
dc.subjectPliability
dc.subjectPost and Core Technique
dc.subjectQuartz
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric
dc.titleEvaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución