dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorAparecido Gimenes, Marcos
dc.creatorRomero Lopes, Catalina
dc.creatorGalgaro, Maria Leticia
dc.creatorMontenegro Valls, José Francisco
dc.creatorKochert, Gary
dc.date2014-05-27T11:20:12Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:16:50Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:20:12Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:16:50Z
dc.date2000-12-07
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T00:58:44Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T00:58:44Z
dc.identifierEuphytica, v. 116, n. 3, p. 187-195, 2000.
dc.identifier0014-2336
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/66405
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/66405
dc.identifier10.1023/A:1004025619704
dc.identifierWOS:000165127200001
dc.identifier2-s2.0-0033712580
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004025619704
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/887982
dc.descriptionWild Arachis germplasm includes potential forage species, such as the rhizomatous Arachis glabrata and the stoloniferous A. pinto and A. repens. Commercial cultivars of A. pintoi have already been released in Australia and in several Latin American countries, and most of these cultivars were derived from a single accession of A. pintoi (GK 12787). Arachis repens is less productive as a forage plant than is A. pintoi. However, it can be crossed with A. pintoi, and thus has good potential as germplasm for the improvement of A. pintoi. Arachis repens is also used as an ornamental plant and ground cover. Many new accessions of these two stoloniferous species are now available, and they harbor significant genetic variability beyond that available in the few older accessions, previously available. Therefore, these new accessions need to be conserved, documented and considered in terms of their potential for crop improvement and direct commercial use. Sixty-four accessions of this new germplasm were analyzed using RAPD analysis. Most of the accessions of A. repens grouped together into a clearly distinct group. In general, the accessions from the distinct valleys of the Jequitinhonha, Sao Francisco and Parana rivers did not group together, suggesting there is not a tight relation between dispersion by rivers and the geographic distribution of genetic variation in these species.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationEuphytica
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectArachis pintoi
dc.subjectArachis repens
dc.subjectPeanut
dc.subjectPhylogeny
dc.subjectRAPD
dc.subjectVariation
dc.subjectaustralia
dc.subjectcrossing
dc.subjectcultivar
dc.subjectgenetic improvement
dc.subjectgenetic line
dc.subjectgenetic variance
dc.subjectphylogeny
dc.subjectrandom amplified polymorphic DNA
dc.subjectsouth and central america
dc.subjectwild relative
dc.titleGenetic variation and phylogenetic relationships based on RAPD analysis in section Caulorrhizae, genus Arachis (Leguminosae)
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución