dc.creatorBertoni, Neilane
dc.creatorSzklo, André
dc.creatorDe Boni, Raquel Brandini
dc.creatorCoutinho, Carolina
dc.creatorVasconcellos, Mauricio
dc.creatorSilva, Pedro Nascimento
dc.creatorAlmeida, Liz Maria de
dc.creatorBastos, Francisco Inácio Pinkusfeld Monteiro
dc.date2019-10-02T14:02:17Z
dc.date2019-10-02T14:02:17Z
dc.date2019
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-26T22:27:33Z
dc.date.available2023-09-26T22:27:33Z
dc.identifierBERTONI, Neilane et al. Electronic cigarettes and narghile users in Brazil: Do they differ from cigarettes smokers? Addictive Behaviors, v. 98, p. 1-6, 2019.
dc.identifier0306-4603
dc.identifierhttps://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/36076
dc.identifier10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.05.031
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8879493
dc.descriptionBackground: Cigarette smoking prevalence is declining, however, other tobacco products have emerged recently, such as electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and narghile (hookah/shisha/waterpipe). Narghile sales are not prohibited in Brazil, but e-cigarettes are. Accurate estimates of such products are key for proper monitoring and control. Objective: To describe the prevalence of e-cigarettes and narghile use and to investigate whether sociodemographic characteristics of individuals who are using these products differ from those who are using manufactured cigarettes. Methods: Using a nationally representative sample survey of Brazilians aged 12–65 years in 2015, we estimated the prevalence rates of each tobacco products within the last 12-months, stratified by macro-region, municipality size, sex-at-birth, sexual orientation, color/race, age-group, and monthly income. Multivariable logistic models were fitted to understand determinants of each tobacco product use, considering the complex sample design. Results: E-cigarette, narghile, and cigarette prevalence rates were estimated at 0.43%, 1.65% and 15.35%, respectively, corresponding to around 0.6million e-cigarette users, 2.5 million narghile users and 23.5 million cigarette users. Non-heterosexual individuals were a most-at-risk group for both e-cigarette/narghile and cigarette use. Despite similarities, e-cigarette/narghile users were younger and had higher socioeconomic status than cigarette users. Additional analyses showed that recent cigarette use seems to be more associated with ecigarette/narghile use among youth than among adults. Conclusions: Our findings may provide valuable information about e-cigarette/narghile use in Brazil. Prevention strategies targeted to youth to both narghile and e-cigarettes use should be implemented together, which might be one strategy to prevent the emergency of a new generation of smokers in Brazil.
dc.description2026-12-31
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsrestricted access
dc.subjectElectronic cigarette
dc.subjectNarghile
dc.subjectNon-cigarette tobacco products
dc.subjectCigarette smoking
dc.subjectSurveillance and monitoring
dc.titleElectronic cigarettes and narghile users in Brazil: do they differ from cigarettes smokers?
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución