Comparacao da recuperacao de anestesia venosa com propofol e anestesia inalatoria com sevoflurano para laparoscopia ginecologica

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorGanem, Eliana Marisa
dc.creatorVianna, Pedro Thadeu Galvão
dc.creatorFabris, P.
dc.creatorMoro, M.
dc.creatorNascimento, P.
dc.creatorCastiglia, Yara Marcondes Machado
dc.date2014-05-27T11:19:43Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:15:38Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:19:43Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:15:38Z
dc.date1999-03-19
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T00:53:59Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T00:53:59Z
dc.identifierRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, v. 49, n. 2, p. 84-88, 1999.
dc.identifier0034-7094
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/65744
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/65744
dc.identifier2-s2.0-0032991112.pdf
dc.identifier2-s2.0-0032991112
dc.identifierhttp://www.sba.com.br/arquivos/revista/rba/mar99084.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/887427
dc.descriptionBackgrounds and Objectives: Both continuous venous anesthesia with propofol and inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane propitiate fast arousal with few side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the arousal and post anesthestic recovery times in patients submitted to these two agents. Methods: Forty three patient aged 18 to 50 years, physical status I or II, submitted to gynecological laparoscopy were distributed in two groups: G1 - propofol in continuous infusion of 115 μg.kg -1.min -1 and G2 sevoflurane. All the patients were pre-medicated with 7.5 mg midazolam, sufentanil 0.5 μg.kg -1, propofol 2 mg.kg -1, atracurium 0.5 mg.kg -1, N 2O in 50% of oxygen in a no-rebreathing system. The depth of the anesthesia and arousal time were assessed by the Bispectral index (BIS). The time between end of anesthesia and eye opening, time for command response and time for orientation were also evaluated. Results: The times recorded in minutes were: G1 - eye opening 8.2 ± 2.9, command response 8.6 ± 3.1, orientation 9.8 ± 3.4, recovery 31.6 ± 3.8; G2 - eye opening 4.5 ± 3, command response 4.9 ± 3.4, orientation 6.2 ± 3.4, recovery 66 ± 8. Except the recovery time, all the values were larger in G1. Conclusions: Both intravenous propofol or inhalational sevoflurane were considered excellent anesthetic techniques as to recovery time and recovery room discharge. Sevoflurane provided an earlier arousal with a longer recovery room stay as compared to propofol.
dc.languagepor
dc.relationRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAnalgesics, opioids: sufentanil
dc.subjectAnesthetics, volatile: sevoflurane
dc.subjectHipnotics: propofol
dc.subjectSurgery, gynecological: laparoscopy
dc.subjectatracurium
dc.subjectmidazolam
dc.subjectnitrous oxide plus oxygen
dc.subjectpropofol
dc.subjectsevoflurane
dc.subjectsufentanil
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectanesthesia level
dc.subjectanesthetic recovery
dc.subjectarousal
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectcontinuous infusion
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectgynecologic surgery
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinhalational drug administration
dc.subjectintravenous drug administration
dc.subjectlaparoscopic surgery
dc.subjectpremedication
dc.titleComparacao da recuperacao de anestesia venosa com propofol e anestesia inalatoria com sevoflurano para laparoscopia ginecologica
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución