dc.creatorRidolfi, Felipe
dc.creatorPeetluk, Lauren
dc.creatorAmorim, Gustavo
dc.creatorTurner, Megan
dc.creatorFigueiredo, Marina
dc.creatorSantos, Marcelo Cordeiro
dc.creatorCavalcante, Solange
dc.creatorKritski, Afrânio
dc.creatorDurovni, Betina
dc.creatorAndrade, Bruno
dc.creatorSterling, Timothy R.
dc.creatorRolla, Valeria
dc.date2022-09-29T17:09:21Z
dc.date2022-09-29T17:09:21Z
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-26T20:53:16Z
dc.date.available2023-09-26T20:53:16Z
dc.identifierRIDOLFI, Felipe et al. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Brazil: different predictors for each type of unsuccessful outcome. Clinical Infectious Diseases, p.1-8, 2022.
dc.identifier1537-6591
dc.identifierhttps://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/54936
dc.identifier10.1093/cid/ciac541
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8865626
dc.descriptionDepartamento de Ciência e Tecnologia (DECIT) . Secretaria de Ciência e Tecnologia (SCTIE). Ministério da Saúde (MS). Institutos Nacionais de Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Alergia e Doenças Infecciosas.
dc.descriptionBackground: Successful tuberculosis (TB) treatment is necessary for disease control. The World Health Organization (WHO) has a target TB treatment success rate of ≥90%. We assessed whether the different types of unfavorable TB treatment outcome had different predictors. Methods: Using data from Regional Prospective Observational Research for Tuberculosis-Brazil, we evaluated biological and behavioral factors associated with each component of unsuccessful TB outcomes, recently updated by WHO (death, loss to follow-up [LTFU], and treatment failure). We included culture-confirmed, drug-susceptible, pulmonary TB participants receiving standard treatment in 2015–2019. Multinomial logistic regression models with inverse probability weighting were used to evaluate the distinct determinants of each unsuccessful outcome. Results: Of 915 participants included, 727 (79%) were successfully treated, 118 (13%) were LTFU, 44 (5%) had treatment failure, and 26 (3%) died. LTFU was associated with current drug-use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0–9.4), current tobacco use (aOR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7–4.9), and being a person living with HIV (PLWH) (aOR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1–3.5). Treatment failure was associated with PLWH (aOR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2–6.2) and having diabetes (aOR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1–4.4). Death was associated with anemia (aOR = 5.3; 95% CI, 1.4–19.7), diabetes (aOR = 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4–6.7), and PLWH (aOR = 3.9; 95% CI, 1.3–11.4). Direct observed therapy was protective for treatment failure (aOR = 0.5; 95% CI, .3–.9) and death (aOR = 0.5; 95% CI, .2–1.0). Conclusions: The treatment success rate was below the WHO target. Behavioral factors were most associated with LTFU, whereas clinical comorbidities were correlated with treatment failure and death. Because determinants of unsuccessful outcomes are distinct, different intervention strategies may be needed to improve TB outcomes.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.rightsrestricted access
dc.subjectTuberculosis
dc.subjectTherapeutics
dc.subjectTuberculose
dc.subjectTratamento
dc.subjectResultados
dc.subjectPerda de seguimento
dc.subjectTuberculosis
dc.subjectTreatment
dc.subjectOutcomes
dc.subjectLoss-to-follow-up
dc.titleTuberculosis treatment outcomes in Brazil: different predictors for each type of unsuccessful outcome
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución