dc.creator | Ferreira, Ana Cristina G. | |
dc.creator | Coelho, Lara E. | |
dc.creator | Grinsztejn, Eduarda | |
dc.creator | Jesus, Carlos S. de | |
dc.creator | Guimarães, Monick L. | |
dc.creator | Veloso, Valdiléa G. | |
dc.creator | Grinsztejn, Beatriz | |
dc.creator | Cardoso, Sandra W. | |
dc.date | 2021-03-11T15:34:16Z | |
dc.date | 2021-03-11T15:34:16Z | |
dc.date | 2017 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-26T20:32:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-26T20:32:54Z | |
dc.identifier | FERREIRA, Ana Cristina G. et al. Prevalence of primary resistance among acutely/recently HIV infected patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, v. 21, n. 4, p. 1-6, 2017 | |
dc.identifier | https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/46339 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8859277 | |
dc.description | Introduction: The widespread use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) increased the transmission
of antiretroviral resistant HIV strains. ART initiation during acute/recent HIV infection limits
HIV reservoirs and improves immune response in HIV infected individuals. Transmitted
drug resistance (TDR) may jeopardize the early goals of early ART among acute/recent HIV
infected patients.
Methods: Patients with acute/recent HIV infection who underwent resistance test before ART
initiation were included in this analysis. HIV-1 sequences were obtained using an in house
protease/reverse transcriptase genotyping assay. TDR was identified according to the Stanford HIV Database for Transmitted Drug Resistance Mutations, based on WHO 2009 surveillance list, and HIV-1 subtyping according to Rega HIV-1 subtyping tool. Comparison between
patients with and without TDR was made using Kruskal–Wallis and Chi-square tests.
Results: Forty-three patients were included, 13 with acute HIV infection and 30 with
recent HIV infection. The overall TDR prevalence was 16.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]:
8.1–30.0%). The highest prevalence of resistance (11.6%, 95% CI: 8.1–24.5) was against nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), and K103N was the most frequently
identified mutation.
Conclusions: The high prevalence of NNRTI resistance indicates that efavirenz-based
regimen without prior resistance testing is not ideal for acutely/recently HIV-infected
individuals in our setting. In this context, the recent proposal of including integrase
inhibitors as a first line ART regimen in Brazil could be an advantage for the treatment
of newly HIV infected individuals. However, it also poses a new challenge, since integrase
resistance test is not routinely performed for ART naive individuals. Further studies on
TDR among acutely/recently HIV-infected are needed to inform on predictors of TDR and
ART outcomes among these population. | |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.rights | restricted access | |
dc.subject | HIV | |
dc.subject | Infection | |
dc.subject | Transmission | |
dc.subject | Primary resistance | |
dc.subject | Antiretroviral therapy | |
dc.title | Prevalence of primary resistance among acutely/recently HIV infected patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil | |
dc.type | Preprint | |