dc.creator | Dantas-Torres, F. | |
dc.creator | Sales, K. G. S | |
dc.creator | Silva, L. G. da | |
dc.creator | Otranto, D. | |
dc.creator | Figueredo, L. A. | |
dc.date | 2019-04-30T13:21:27Z | |
dc.date | 2019-04-30T13:21:27Z | |
dc.date | 2018 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-26T20:26:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-26T20:26:30Z | |
dc.identifier | DANTAS-TORRES, F. et al. Level of agreement between two commercially available rapid serological tests and the official screening test used to detect Leishmania seropositive dogs in Brazil. The Veterinary Journal, v. 234, p. 102–104, 1 abr. 2018. | |
dc.identifier | 1532-2971 | |
dc.identifier | https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/32876 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.02.007 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8856978 | |
dc.description | This study compared the level of agreement between two commercially available rapid serological tests and the official screening test used to detect Leishmania seropositive dogs in Brazil. Ninety-five canine sera from a visceral leishmaniasis endemic area were tested by using the official immunochromatographic test (T1; rK28 antigen) based on dual path platform technology, a rapid ELISA (T2; purified Leishmania antigens) and an immunochromatographic test (T3; rK28 antigen) based on lateral flow. There was substantial agreement (Kappa 0.77; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.62-0.91; P<0.001; observed agreement 90.5%) between T1 and T2, and a fair agreement (Kappa 0.26; 95% CI 0.08-0.43; P<0.001; observed agreement 74.7%) between T1 and T3. Sixteen dogs positive at T1 and T2 were negative at T3. T2 may be a reliable alternative to T1, while T3 could lead to an underestimation of the actual number of seropositive dogs. | |
dc.description | 2050-01-01 | |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.rights | restricted access | |
dc.subject | Canine | |
dc.subject | Leishmaniasis | |
dc.subject | Rapid diagnos tictest | |
dc.subject | Serology | |
dc.subject | Animais | |
dc.subject | Anticorpos, protozoários / sangue | |
dc.subject | Antígenos, Protozoários / imunologia | |
dc.subject | Brasil | |
dc.subject | Cromatografia, Afinidade | |
dc.subject | Doenças do Cão / diagnóstico | |
dc.subject | Doenças do Cão / epidemiologia | |
dc.subject | Cães | |
dc.subject | Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática / métodos | |
dc.subject | Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática / veterinária | |
dc.subject | Leishmania infantum / imunologia | |
dc.subject | Leishmania infantum / isolamento e purificação | |
dc.subject | Leishmaniose Visceral / diagnóstico | |
dc.subject | Leishmaniose Visceral / epidemiologia | |
dc.subject | Leishmaniose Visceral / veterinária | |
dc.subject | Sensibilidade e Especificidade | |
dc.subject | Testes sorológicos / veterinários | |
dc.title | Level of agreement between two commercially available rapid serological tests and the official screening test used to detect Leishmania seropositive dogs in Brazil | |
dc.type | Article | |