dc.creatorAste Salazar,Hernán
dc.date2003-10-01
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-25T17:53:10Z
dc.date.available2023-09-25T17:53:10Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1018-130X2003000400009
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8834098
dc.descriptionIn recent years there has been some improvement in surgical and interventional techniques that have modified the classical indications making them more risky. Left main coronary stenoses are even more dreadful lesions, and the results of percutaneous management are odd with varying mortality (10-12% on average), and high morbidity. Moreover we have small number of cases in the literature. Comparing these results with surgery, we find the later to be safer with mortality under 4%, low morbidity and a long term experience in the management of this pathology. Results, moreover, tend to favor surgery in the coronary restenosis in spite of the use of stents. ( Rev Med Hered 2003; 14: 204-206).
dc.formattext/html
dc.languagees
dc.publisherUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Facultad de Medicina "Alberto Hurtado"
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceRevista Medica Herediana v.14 n.4 2003
dc.subjectCoronary stenoses
dc.subjectcoronary restenosis
dc.titleLas lesiones de tronco de coronaria izquierda: ¿cirugía o intervencionismo?
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución