Short implants (6 mm) installed immediately into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorBressan, Eriberto
dc.creatorSivolella, Stefano
dc.creatorAlmagro Urrutia, Zoraya
dc.creatorSalata, Luiz Antonio
dc.creatorLang, Niklaus Peter
dc.creatorBotticelli, Daniele
dc.date2014-05-20T15:30:30Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:06:00Z
dc.date2014-05-20T15:30:30Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:06:00Z
dc.date2012-05-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T00:17:15Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T00:17:15Z
dc.identifierClinical Oral Implants Research. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 23, n. 5, p. 536-541, 2012.
dc.identifier0905-7161
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/39853
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/39853
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02432.x
dc.identifierWOS:000302606800003
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02432.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/882693
dc.descriptionAim: To evaluate the effect of implant length (6 mm vs. 11 mm) on osseointegration (bone-toimplant contact) of implants installed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction.Material and methods: In six Labrador dogs, the pulp tissue of the mesial roots of P-3(3) was removed and the root canals were filled. Flaps were elevated bilaterally, the premolars hemisectioned and the distal roots removed. Recipient sites were prepared in the distal alveolus and a 6 mm or an 11 mm long implant was installed at the test and control sites, respectively. Non-submerged healing was allowed. After 4 months of healing, block sections of the implant sites were obtained for histological processing and peri-implant tissue assessment.Results: No statistically significant differences were found between test and control sites both for hard and soft tissue parameters. The bone-to-implant contact evaluated at the apical region of the implants was similar as well. Although not statistically significant, the location of the top of the bony crest at the buccal aspect was more apical in relation to the implant shoulder at the test compared with the control sites (2.0 +/- 1.4 and 1.2 +/- 1.1 mm, respectively).Conclusions: Shorter implants (6 mm) present with equal osseointegration than do longer implants (11 mm).
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relationClinical Oral Implants Research
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectanimal study
dc.subjectextraction socket
dc.subjectimplant dentistry
dc.subjectshort implants
dc.subjecthard tissue
dc.subjectsoft tissues
dc.subjectperi-implant mucosa
dc.subjectosseointegration
dc.titleShort implants (6 mm) installed immediately into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución