dc.creatorPrieto,Gerardo
dc.creatorDelgado,Ana R.
dc.creatorPerea,M. Victoria
dc.creatorGarcía,Ricardo
dc.creatorLadera,Valentina
dc.date2018-06-01
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-25T14:26:04Z
dc.date.available2023-09-25T14:26:04Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2215-35352018000100066
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8819805
dc.descriptionAbstract Objective: Two scoring systems for a verbal fluency test were compared using the Rasch Rating Scale Model. Method: The analysis was carried out on 289 participants, 92 of whom had had a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis. Scores were calculated with two different category systems: a conventional procedure and a percentile-based one. Results: The percentile-based Rasch scores produce adequate categories and reliable measures, while the correlation with the Mini Mental State Examination evinces concurrent validity. After statistically controlling for age, percentile-based Rasch measures discriminated between both groups, demonstrating predictive validity. Conclusions: The analysis of the two procedures allows for the recommendation of the use of percentile-based categories.
dc.formattext/html
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInstituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas, Universidad de Costa Rica
dc.relation10.15517/ap.v32i124.31837
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceActualidades en Psicología v.32 n.124 2018
dc.subjectNeuropsychological assessment
dc.subjectparkinson’s disease
dc.subjectverbal fluency
dc.subjectRasch Rating Scale Model
dc.titleContrasting two verbal fluency scoring systems using the rasch rating scale model
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución