dc.creatorBonilla López,Marisela
dc.date2021-12-01
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-25T14:24:09Z
dc.date.available2023-09-25T14:24:09Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2215-26442021000200577
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8819141
dc.descriptionAbstract The extensive amount of literature on written corrective feedback has dispelled many doubts that question its effectiveness. However, despite this valid contribution, there is still controversy about pedagogical recommendations found in such literature, particularly, after conducting a systematic bibliographic review. The results reveal an overall lacks consistency, to the extent that a detailed classification based on both scope and type is not feasible. The objective of this article, thus, is to address previously gleaned issues by elucidating the two most problematic variables found in such literature in order propose an updated typology of written CF.
dc.formattext/html
dc.languageen
dc.publisherUniversidad de Costa Rica
dc.relation10.15517/revedu.v45i1.43289
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceRevista Educación v.45 n.2 2021
dc.subjectSecond Language Teaching
dc.subjectCorrective Feedback Research
dc.subjectTerminology Problems
dc.subjectTypology Proposal
dc.titleAn Updated Typology of Written Corrective Feedback: Resolving Terminology Issues
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución