dc.creatorMichalski,Fernanda
dc.creatorCrawshaw JR,Peter G
dc.creatorde Oliveira,Tadeu G
dc.creatorFabián,Marta E
dc.date2007-03-01
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-25T14:08:04Z
dc.date.available2023-09-25T14:08:04Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-77442007000100033
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8813393
dc.descriptionCapturing small carnivores is often necessary for obtaining key ecological data. We compared the efficiency of box and leg-hold traps, using live and dead bait, to capture six carnivore species (Herpailurus yagouaroundi (É. Geoffroyi, 1803), Leopardus tigrinus (Schreber, 1775), Nasua nasua (Linnaeus, 1766), Cerdocyon thous (Linnaeus, 1766), Eira barbara (Linnaeus, 1758), and Galictis cuja (Molina, 1782)). The use of leg-hold traps significantly increased the capture rate of carnivores (5.77%) and non-target species (non-carnivores, 11.54%). Dead bait significantly attracted more non-carnivores than carnivores and live bait was more efficient for capturing carnivores (2.56%) than non-carnivores (0.77%). Both box and leg-hold traps caused some minor injuries (swelling and claw loss). We provide recommendations for the ethical use of these trap and bait types. Rev. Biol. Trop. 55 (1): 315-320. Epub 2007 March. 31.
dc.formattext/html
dc.languageen
dc.publisherUniversidad de Costa Rica
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceRevista de Biología Tropical v.55 n.1 2007
dc.subjectAtlantic forest
dc.subjectbox-trap
dc.subjectleg-hold trap
dc.subjectcapture success
dc.subjectmammals
dc.subjectsmall carnivores
dc.subjectnon-carnivores
dc.subjectethics
dc.titleEfficiency of box-traps and leg-hold traps with several bait types for capturing small carnivores (Mammalia) in a disturbed area of Southeastern Brazil
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución