Impact of different obesity assessment methods after acute coronary syndromes

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.creatorNunes, Caroline N. [UNESP]
dc.creatorMinicucci, Minicucci F. [UNESP]
dc.creatorFarah, Elaine [UNESP]
dc.creatorFusco, Danieliso [UNESP]
dc.creatorGaiolla, Paula Schmidt Azevedo [UNESP]
dc.creatorPaiva, Sérgio A. R. [UNESP]
dc.creatorZornoff, Leonardo A. M. [UNESP]
dc.date2016-04-01T18:42:52Z
dc.date2016-04-01T18:42:52Z
dc.date2014
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T09:09:26Z
dc.date.available2023-09-12T09:09:26Z
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20140073
dc.identifierArq Bras Cardiol, v. 103, n. 1, p. 19, 2014.
dc.identifier2512-0081
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/136839
dc.identifier10.5935/abc.20140073
dc.identifierS0066-782X2014001900004
dc.identifierS0066-782X2014001900004-en.pdf
dc.identifierS0066-782X2014001900004-pt.pdf
dc.identifier1213140801402647
dc.identifier7438704034471673
dc.identifier0000-0002-5843-6232
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8786081
dc.descriptionBackground: Abdominal obesity is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Therefore, identifying the best method for measuring waist circumference (WC) is a priority. Objective: To evaluate the eight methods of measuring WC in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as a predictor of cardiovascular complications during hospitalization. Methods: Prospective study of patients with ACS. The measurement of WC was performed by eight known methods: midpoint between the last rib and the iliac crest (1), point of minimum circumference (2); immediately above the iliac crest (3), umbilicus (4), one inch above the umbilicus (5), one centimeter above the umbilicus (6), smallest rib and (7) the point of greatest circumference around the waist (8). Complications included: angina, arrhythmia, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, hypotension, pericarditis and death. Logistic regression tests were used for predictive factors. Results: A total of 55 patients were evaluated. During the hospitalization period, which corresponded on average to seven days, 37 (67%) patients had complications, with the exception of death, which was not observed in any of the cases. Of these complications, the only one that was associated with WC was angina, and with every cm of WC increase, the risk for angina increased from 7.5 to 9.9%, depending on the measurement site. It is noteworthy the fact that there was no difference between the different methods of measuring WC as a predictor of angina. Conclusion: The eight methods of measuring WC are also predictors of recurrent angina after acute coronary syndromes. Key words: Evaluation; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Abdominal Circumference
dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu, Distrito de Rubião Júnior, s/nº, CEP 18618-970, SP, Brasil
dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu, Distrito de Rubião Júnior, s/nº, CEP 18618-970, SP, Brasil
dc.format19-24
dc.languagepor
dc.relationArq Bras Cardiol
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes
dc.subjectEvaluation
dc.subjectAcute coronary syndrome
dc.subjectAbdominal circumference
dc.subjectAvaliação
dc.subjectSíndrome coronariana aguda
dc.subjectCircunferência abdominal
dc.titleImpacto de diferentes métodos de avaliação da obesidade abdominal após síndromes coronarianas agudas
dc.titleImpact of different obesity assessment methods after acute coronary syndromes
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución