Analysis of effectiveness of three forest interventionist techniques and proposal of a new and integrated model of forest restoration

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.creatorCastelli, Karen Regina [UNESP]
dc.creatorBarreto, Mariana Gregorio [UNESP]
dc.creatorFrancesconi, Wendy
dc.creatorValle, Leandro Dalla [UNESP]
dc.creatorMondelli, Giulliana
dc.creatorAbilio, Fernanda Maria
dc.creatorSilva, Alexandre Marco da [UNESP]
dc.date2016-03-02T13:04:24Z
dc.date2016-03-02T13:04:24Z
dc.date2015
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T08:51:12Z
dc.date.available2023-09-12T08:51:12Z
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1043957
dc.identifierEnvironmental Technology, v. 36, n. 21, p. 1-33, 2015.
dc.identifier0959-3330
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/135781
dc.identifier10.1080/09593330.2015.1043957
dc.identifier2888313401319362
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8785013
dc.descriptionWe assessed the efficacy of three different forest intervention techniques, in terms of phytosociological and edaphic responses, that were implemented in 2007. In a farm where trees are planted and managed for cellulose production as well as set aside for environmental conservation, four stands were analysed: three of them were considered degraded and were managed using different intervention techniques (transposition, perch, and abandonment), and a fourth stand comprising pristine vegetation was considered a control (reference). Floristic and phytosociology data were collected in three 10 × 10 m plots established in each stand. Also, a total of 48 soil samples were collected to analyse physical and chemical attributes of the topsoil for the different stands. In terms of biodiversity, all the treatments showed significantly lower values when compared to the reference area. However, the soils in all the treatment and reference stands are similar in terms of physical and chemical attributes. Taking into account the specificities of each restoration technique, we verified that the integrated use of a set of management practices, constituted by the (1) abandonment of the area and (2) following a selective killing of the eucalyptus, is the most suitable and promising model to provide fast and effective restoration in terms of environmental indicators.
dc.descriptionNational Soil Erosion Research Laboratory (NSERL), United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Services, 275 S. Russell Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
dc.descriptionEngineering, Modelling and Applied Social Sciences Centre (CECS), Federal University of ABC (UFABC), Santo André, SP. 5001, Avenida dos Estados. Bairro Bangu, Santo André, SP 09210-580, Brazil
dc.descriptionECTX, S.A. 811/909, Ribeirão Preto Street, Jardim Marília, Salto, SP 13323-010, Brazil
dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Engenharia Ambiental, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia (ICTS), Sorocaba, Av. 3 de Março, 511, Alto da Boa Vista, CEP 18087180, SP, Brasil
dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Engenharia Ambiental, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia (ICTS), Sorocaba, Av. 3 de Março, 511, Alto da Boa Vista, CEP 18087180, SP, Brasil
dc.format1-33
dc.languageeng
dc.relationEnvironmental Technology
dc.relation1.666
dc.relation0,503
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes
dc.subjectEnvironmental indicator
dc.subjectEnvironmental assessment
dc.subjectForest ecology
dc.subjectForest restoration technology
dc.subjectInterventionist practices
dc.titleAnalysis of effectiveness of three forest interventionist techniques and proposal of a new and integrated model of forest restoration
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución