dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade São Judas Tadeu
dc.contributorUniversidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (UNESC)
dc.creatorVuolo, Mateus K.
dc.creatorPossato, Jonathann C.
dc.creatorSilveira, Loreana S. [UNESP]
dc.creatorZagatto, Alessandro Moura [UNESP]
dc.creatorRodrigues, Bruno
dc.creatorSouza, Cláudio T. de
dc.creatorGobbo, Luís A. [UNESP]
dc.creatorLira, Fábio S.
dc.date2016-03-02T13:03:30Z
dc.date2016-03-02T13:03:30Z
dc.date2014
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T08:48:10Z
dc.date.available2023-09-12T08:48:10Z
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-014-0194-9
dc.identifierSport Sciences for Health, v. 10, n. 3, p. 205-210, 2014.
dc.identifier1824-7490
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/135603
dc.identifier10.1007/s11332-014-0194-9
dc.identifier2545518618024469
dc.identifier1329771683586073
dc.identifier0000-0002-9645-1003
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8784835
dc.descriptionPurpose The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of intensity and interval of recovery on performance in the bench press exercise, and the response of salivary lactate and alpha amylase levels. Methods Ten sportsman (aged 29 ± 4 years; body mass index 26 ± 2 kg/cm2 ) were divided in two groups: G70 (performing a bench press exercise at 70 % one repetition maximum—1RM), and G90 (performing a bench press exercise at 90 %—1RM). All groups were engaged in three intervals of recovery (30, 60 and 90 s). The maximum number of repetitions (MNR) and total weight lifted were computed, and saliva samples were collected 15 min before and after different intervals of recovery. For the comparison of the performance and biochemistry parameters, ANOVA tests for repeated measurements were conducted, with a significance level set at 5 %. Results In G70, the 30 s MNR was lower than the 60 and 90 s intervals of recovery (p\0.05) and the MNR with the 60 s interval of recovery was lower than the 90 s interval of recovery (p\0.041). Similarly, in G90 with the 30 s of interval of recovery, the sets were lower than observed with the 60 and 90 s (p\0.05), and MNR with the 60 s interval of recovery was lower than the 90 s interval of recovery (p\0.05). The salivary lactate showed an increase after exercise (p\0.05) when compared with the rest period for all groups, and no effects were observed for salivary alpha amylase. Conclusions Based on this result, the sets and reps can be modified to change the recovery time. This effect is very useful to improve the performance in relationship to different fitness levels.
dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Educação Física, Faculdade de Ciências de Bauru, Bauru, Avenida Engenheiro Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, Vargem Limpa, CEP 17033360, SP, Brasil
dc.descriptionFaculdade de Educação Física, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
dc.descriptionUnidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Laboratório de Fisiologia e Bioquímica do Exercício, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
dc.descriptionLaboratório do Movimento Humano, Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Educação Física, Faculdade de Ciências de Bauru, Bauru, Avenida Engenheiro Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, Vargem Limpa, CEP 17033360, SP, Brasil
dc.format205-210
dc.languageeng
dc.relationSport Sciences for Health
dc.relation0,311
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes
dc.subjectStrength exercise
dc.subjectIntensity
dc.subjectRecovery
dc.subjectSalivary lactate
dc.titleIntensity and interval of recovery in strength exercise influences performance: salivary lactate and alpha amylase as biochemical markers: a pilot study
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución