dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributorUniversity of Guelph
dc.creatorGonçalves-Souza, Thiago [UNESP]
dc.creatorRomero, Gustavo Quevedo
dc.creatorCottenie, Karl
dc.date2015-11-03T15:28:44Z
dc.date2015-11-03T15:28:44Z
dc.date2014-12-30
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T07:07:23Z
dc.date.available2023-09-12T07:07:23Z
dc.identifierhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115137
dc.identifierPlos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 9, n. 12, 20 p., 2014.
dc.identifier1932-6203
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/130032
dc.identifier10.1371/journal.pone.0115137
dc.identifierWOS:000347063500011
dc.identifierWOS000347063500011.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8779356
dc.descriptionBiogeography and metacommunity ecology provide two different perspectives on species diversity. Both are spatial in nature but their spatial scales do not necessarily match. With recent boom of metacommunity studies, we see an increasing need for clear discrimination of spatial scales relevant for both perspectives. This discrimination is a necessary prerequisite for improved understanding of ecological phenomena across scales. Here we provide a case study to illustrate some spatial scale-dependent concepts in recent metacommunity studies and identify potential pitfalls. We presented here the diversity patterns of Neotropical lepidopterans and spiders viewed both from metacommunity and biogeographical perspectives. Specifically, we investigated how the relative importance of niche-and dispersal-based processes for community assembly change at two spatial scales: metacommunity scale, i.e. within a locality, and biogeographical scale, i.e. among localities widely scattered along a macroclimatic gradient. As expected, niche-based processes dominated the community assembly at metacommunity scale, while dispersal-based processes played a major role at biogeographical scale for both taxonomical groups. However, we also observed small but significant spatial effects at metacommunity scale and environmental effects at biogeographical scale. We also observed differences in diversity patterns between the two taxonomical groups corresponding to differences in their dispersal modes. Our results thus support the idea of continuity of processes interactively shaping diversity patterns across scales and emphasize the necessity of integration of metacommunity and biogeographical perspectives.
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia
dc.descriptionUniversity of Guelph, Department of Integrative Biology
dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas de São José do Rio Preto
dc.descriptionFAPESP: 2008/11530-2
dc.descriptionFAPESP: 2010/51636-4
dc.descriptionCNPq: 309815/2009-6
dc.format20
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPublic Library Science
dc.relationPlos One
dc.relation2.766
dc.relation1,164
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleMetacommunity versus Biogeography: a case study of two groups of neotropical vegetation-dwelling arthropods
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución