dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade Anhanguera de São Paulo
dc.contributorUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto (UNAERP)
dc.contributorUniversidade de Franca (UNIFRAN)
dc.creatorCiolac, Emmanuel Gomes [UNESP]
dc.creatorMantuani, Simone de Souza
dc.creatorNeiva, Cassiano Merussi [UNESP]
dc.creatorVerardi, Carlos Eduardo Lopes [UNESP]
dc.creatorPessôa-Filho, Dalton Müller [UNESP]
dc.creatorPimenta, Leonardo
dc.date2015-10-21T21:03:31Z
dc.date2015-10-21T21:03:31Z
dc.date2015-01-01
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T06:54:21Z
dc.date.available2023-09-12T06:54:21Z
dc.identifierhttp://183.indexcopernicus.com/abstracted.php?level=5&ICID=1134312
dc.identifierBiology Of Sport. Warsaw 45: Inst Sport, v. 32, n. 2, p. 103-108, 2015.
dc.identifier0860-021X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/129419
dc.identifier10.5604/20831862.1134312
dc.identifierWOS:000357556400003
dc.identifier0323573809193832
dc.identifier4013645288037489
dc.identifier9228319308083224
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8778759
dc.descriptionThe aim of the present study was to analyse the usefulness of the 6-20 rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale for prescribing and self-regulating high-intensity interval training (HIT) in young individuals. Eight healthy young subjects (age = 27.5 +/- 6.7 years) performed maximal graded exercise testing to determine their maximal and reserve heart rate (HR). Subjects then performed two HIT sessions (20 min on a treadmill) prescribed and regulated by their HR (HR: 1 min at 50% alternated with 1 min at 85% of reserve HR) or RPE (RPE: 1 minute at the 9-11 level [very light-fairly light] alternated with 1 minute at the 15-17 level [hard-very hard]) in random order. HR response and walking/running speed during the 20 min of exercise were compared between sessions. No significant difference between sessions was observed in HR during low- (HR: 135 +/- 15 bpm; RPE: 138 +/- 20 bpm) and high-intensity intervals (HR: 168 +/- 15 bpm; RPE: 170 +/- 18 bpm). Walking/running speed during low- (HR: 5.7 +/- 1.2 km.h(-1); RPE: 5.7 +/- 1.3 km.h(-1)) and high-intensity intervals (HR: 7.8 +/- 1.9 km.h(-1); RPE: 8.2 +/- 1.7 km.h(-1)) was also not different between sessions. No significant differences were observed in HR response and walking/running speed between HIT sessions prescribed and regulated by HR or RPE. This finding suggests that the 6-20 RPE scale may be a useful tool for prescribing and self-regulating HIT in young subjects.
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionFundação Nacional de Desenvolvimento do Ensino Superior Particular (FUNADESP)
dc.descriptionUniversidade Anhanguera de São Paulo, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde
dc.descriptionUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto, Faculdade de Medicina
dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Departamento de Educação Física, Faculdade de Ciências de Bauru
dc.descriptionFAPESP: 2012/ 02409-0
dc.descriptionFUNADESP: 5500261
dc.format103-108
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInst Sport
dc.relationBiology Of Sport
dc.relation1.729
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectExercise prescription
dc.subjectHeart rate
dc.subjectHigh-intensity interval training
dc.subjectRating of perceived exertion
dc.titleRating of perceived exertion as a tool for prescribing and self regulating interval training: a pilot study
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución