Efectos del uso sinérgico de eubióticos sobre parámetros productivos y alométricos en pollos de engorde de la línea Ross AP

dc.creatorRodríguez Uribe, María Carolina
dc.creatorCarbajal Jiménez, Jairo Gregorio
dc.creatorJaimes Dueñez, Jeiczon
dc.date20 de septiembre de 2022
dc.date10 de octubre de 2022
dc.date2023-06-22T07:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T21:56:45Z
dc.date.available2023-09-07T21:56:45Z
dc.identifierhttps://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/mv/vol1/iss47/10
dc.identifierhttps://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1523&context=mv
dc.identifierhttps://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/context/mv/article/1523/viewcontent/09RevMedicinaVeterinaria_47_MCRodriguez_et_al.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8749419
dc.descriptionActualmente los eubióticos se postulan como una alternativa potencial de reemplazo a los antibióticos utilizados como subterapéuticos, a modo de promotores de crecimiento. Aunque múltiples estudios han demostrado el efecto benéfico de los eubióticos en los parámetros productivos y alométricos del pollo de engorde, el uso combinado de estos ha sido poco evaluado, sin conocerse su efecto sinérgico. El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el efecto del uso sinérgico de eubióticos sobre los parámetros productivos y alométricos en pollos de engorde de la línea Ross AP. El estudio se realizó durante el año 2020 en una granja experimental del municipio de Piedecuesta, Santander, a una altura de 1005 msnm. Un total de 1400 animales fueron analizados mediante un diseño completamente al azar, evaluando siete tratamientos T1 = dieta base (DB), T2 = DB + antibiótico promotor de crecimiento (APC), T3 = DB + extracto natural (EN) + probiótico (Pro) + prebiótico (Pre), T4 = DB + EN + Pro + ácido graso de cadena media (AGCM), T5 = DB + Pre + Pro + AGCM, T6 = DB + EN + Pre + AGCM y T7 = DB + Pre + Pro + AGCM); con ocho repeticiones de 25 animales por cada tratamiento. Los parámetros productivos fueron evaluados al día 7, 14, 21, 28 y 35, mientras que los alométricos específicamente al día 35. Adicionalmente, un análisis de productividad económica fue realizado teniendo en cuenta los valores comerciales reportados al cierre del año 2020. En general se observaron diferencias significativas (P<0.05) en los siguientes parámetros productivos: peso promedio por ave al día 7, 14, 21, 28 y 35; consumo total por corral al día 14, 21 y 28; consumo acumulado por ave al día 21, 28 y 35; consumo promedio por ave al día 21, 28 y 35; conversión ajustada por mortalidad al día 21, 28 y 35; VPI al día 7, 21, y 28 e IEE, con los mejores valores en los tratamientos 3, 5, 6 y 7. Respecto a los parámetros alométricos, se observaron diferencias significativas (P<0.05) en los siguientes ítems: peso ave con vísceras y con plumas, peso ave sin vísceras y sin plumas, peso pechuga, peso alas, peso costillar y peso tarsos. La mayor productividad económica se obtuvo en los tratamientos 6 y 7, comparado con el tratamiento 1, respectivamente. En conclusión, se determinó que los mejores parámetros productivos y alométricos se presentaron en los animales que consumieron los tratamientos que contenían Manano-oligosacárido (MOS) como prebiótico en su formulación, por tal motivo la adición de estos compuestos, deben considerarse como alternativa nutricional inocua para mejorar el efecto sinérgico con otros eubióticos, e incrementar la eficiencia de los sistemas productivos.
dc.descriptionCurrently, eubiotics are postulated as a potential replacement alternative to antibiotics used as subtherapeutic, as growth promoters. Although multiple studies have shown the beneficial effect of eubiotics on the productive and allometric parameters of broilers, the combined use of these has been little evaluated, without knowing their synergistic effect. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the synergistic use of eubiotics on the productive and allometric parameters in broilers of the Ross AP line. The study was carried out during 2020 at the experimental farm in Piedecuesta, Santander at an altitude of 1005 meters above sea level. A total of 1400 animals were analyzed using a completely randomized design, evaluating seven treatments (T1 = base diet (BD), T2 = BD + growth-promoting antibiotic (GPA), T3 = BD + natural extract (NE) + probiotic (Pro) + prebiotic (Pre), T4 = BD + NE + Pro + medium-chain fatty acid (MCFA), T5 = BD + Pre + Pro + MCFA, T6 = BD + NE + Pre + MCFA and T7 = BD + Pre + Pro + MCFA), with eight repetitions of 25 animals for each treatment. The productive parameters were evaluated on days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35, while the allometric parameters were specifically evaluated on day 35. Additionally, an analysis of economic productivity was carried out considering the commercial values reported at the end of the year 2020. In general, significant differences (P<0.05) were observed in the following productive parameters: average weight per bird on days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35; total consumption per pen at days 14, 21, and 28; accumulated consumption per bird on days 21, 28 and 35; average consumption per bird at day 21, 28 and 35; conversion adjusted for mortality at day 21, 28 and 35; VPI at day 7, 21, and 28 and IEE, with the best values in treatments 3, 5, 6 and 7. Regarding the allometric parameters, significant differences (P<0.05) were observed in the following items: poultry weight with viscera and feathers, poultry weight without viscera and without feathers, breast weight, wings weight, rib weight, and hock weight. The highest economic productivity was obtained in treatments 6 and 7, compared to treatment 1, respectively. In conclusion, it was determined that the best productive and allometric parameters were presented in the animals that consumed the treatments that contained Mannanoligosaccharides (MOS) as prebiotics in their formulation, for this reason, the addition of these compounds should be considered as a safe nutritional alternative to improve the synergistic effect with other eubiotics and increase the efficiency of production systems.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formate0007
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Salle. Ediciones Unisalle
dc.relation1. MacDonald, K. Federación Nacional de Avicultores de Colombia. Precios mayoristas [internet]. FENAVI; 2021 [citado 2023 abr 14]. Disponible en https://fenavi.org/estadisticas/precios-mayoristas-pollo/
dc.relation2. Arenas NE, Moreno Melo V. Producción pecuaria y emergencia de antibiótico resistencia en Colombia: revisión sistemática. Infectio. 2018;22(2):110-119. https://doi.org/10.22354/in.v22i2.717
dc.relationMartinez Rocha AK. Uso de antimicrobianos en la avicultura: sus implicaciones en la salud pública [tesis maestría]. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2012.
dc.relationArdoino SM, Toso RE, Alvarez HL, Mariani EL, Cachau PD, Mancilla MV, et al. Antimicrobianos como promotores de crecimiento (AGP) en alimentos balanceados para aves: uso, resistencia bacteriana, nuevas alternativas y opciones de reemplazo. CienVet. 2018;19(1):50-66. https://doi.org/10.19137/cienvet-20171914
dc.relationUntari T, Herawati O, Anggita M, Asmara W, Endang A, Hastuti T, et al. The Effect of Antibiotic Growth Promoters (AGP) on Antibiotic Resistance and the Digestive System of Broiler Chicken in Sleman, Yogyakarta. BIO Web Conf. 2021;33:04005. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20213304005
dc.relationMohammadzadeh M, Montaseri M, Hosseinzadeh S, Majlesi M, Berizi E, Zare M, et al. Antibiotic residues in poultry tissues in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2021;204(Pt B):112038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112038
dc.relationDepartamento Nacional de Planeación DNP. CONPES 2007. 2017.
dc.relationDirección de Medicamentos y Tecnologías en Salud. Plan nacional de respuesta a la resistencia a los antimicrobianos [internet]. MINSALUD; 2018 [citado 2023 abr 14]. Disponible en https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/MET/plan-respuesta-resistencia-antimicrobianos.pdf
dc.relationSun B, Hou L, Yang Y. Effects of Adding Eubiotic Lignocellulose on the Growth Performance, Laying Performance, Gut Microbiota, and Short-Chain Fatty Acids of Two Breeds of Hens. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:668003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.668003
dc.relationDíaz López EA, Ángel Isaza J, Ángel D. Probióticos en la avicultura: una revisión: Rev Med Vet. 2017;(35):175-189. https://doi.org/10.19052/mv.4400
dc.relationWang Y, Dong He, Song D, Zhou H, Wang W, Miao H, et al. Effects of microencapsulated probiotics and prebiotics on growth performance, antioxidative abilities, immune functions, and caecal microflora in broiler chickens. Food Agric Immunol. 2018;29(1):859-869. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540105.2018.1463972
dc.relationWeber GM, Michalczuk M, Huyghebaert G, Juin H, Kwakernaak C, Gracia MI. Effects of a blend of essential oil compounds and benzoic acid on performance of broiler chickens as revealed by a meta-analysis of 4 growth trials in various locations. Poult Sci. 2012;91(11):2820-2828. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02243
dc.relationSong D, Li A, Wang Y, Song G, Cheng J, Wang L, et al. Effects of synbiotic on growth, digestibility, immune and antioxidant performance in broilers. Animal. 2022;16(4):100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100497
dc.relationInstituto Latinoamericano del Pollo. Precios de Mercados Internacionales de la Carne de Pollo [internet]. ILP; 2021 [citado 2022 sep 20]. Disponible en https://ilp-ala.org/precios-de-mercados-internacionales-de-la-carne-de-pollo/
dc.relationArocena PF, Zonco Menghini CA, Rubio, R. Utilización de prebiótico en la alimentación de pollos de engorde [tesis pregrado]. Tandil: Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.
dc.relationSong J, Xiao K, Ke YL, Jiao LF, Hu CH, Diao QY, et al. Effect of a probiotic mixture on intestinal microflora, morphology, and barrier integrity of broilers subjected to heat stress. Poult Sci. 2014;93(3):581-588. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03455
dc.relationTeng PY, Adhikari R, Llamas-Moya S, Kim WK. Effects of combination of mannan-oligosaccharides and β-glucan on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and immune gene expression in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2021;100(12):101483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101483
dc.relationBiswas A, Mohan N, Dev K, Mir NA, Tiwari AK. Effect of dietary mannan oligosaccharides and fructo-oligosaccharides on physico-chemical indices, antioxidant and oxidative stability of broiler chicken meat. Sci Rep. 2021;11:20567. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99620-2
dc.relationMostafa M, Thabet H, Abdelaziz M. Effect of Bio-Mos Utilization in Broiler Chick Diets on Performance, Microbial and Histological Alteration of Small Intestine and Economic Efficiency. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 2015;10(7):323-334. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2015.323.334
dc.relationZhou M, Tao Y, Lai C, Huang C, Zhou Y, Yong Q. Effects of Mannanoligosaccharide Supplementation on the Growth Performance, Immunity, and Oxidative Status of Partridge Shank Chickens. Animals. 2019;9:817. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100817
dc.relationBenites V, Gilharry R. Evaluación del uso de oligosacáridos – mananos: Bio-Mos® y Safmannan® en la productividad de pollos de engorde en condiciones limpias y sucias [tesis pregrado]. Honduras: Universidad Zamorano; 2007.
dc.relationSavage T, Cotter P, Zakrzewska E. The effect of feeding mannan oligosaccharide on immunoglobuilins, plasma IgG and bile IgA of Wrolstad MW male turkeys. Puolt Sci. 1996;75:143-148.
dc.relationKridtayopas C, Rakangtong C, Bunchasak C, Loongyai W. Effect of prebiotic and synbiotic supplementation in diet on growth performance, small intestinal morphology, stress, and bacterial population under high stocking density condition of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2019;98(10):4595-4605. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez152
dc.relationRoberfroid MB. Prebiotics and probiotics: ¿are they functional foods? Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(6):1682S-1687S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1682S
dc.relationGreene G, Koolman L, Whyte P, Lynch H, Coffey A, Lucey B, et al. The efficacy of organic acid, medium chain fatty acid and essential oil based broiler treatments; in vitro anti-Campylobacter jejuni activity and the effect of these chemical-based treatments on broiler performance. J Appl Microbiol. 2022;132(1):687-695. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15204
dc.relationIrawan A, Hidayat C, Jayanegara A, Ratriyanto A. Essential oils as growth-promoting additives on performance, nutrient digestibility, cecal microbes, and serum metabolites of broiler chickens: a meta-analysis. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2021;34(9):1499-1513. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0668
dc.relationLiu SJ, Wang J, He TF, Liu HS, Piao XS. Effects of natural capsicum extract on growth performance, nutrient utilization, antioxidant status, immune function, and meat quality in broilers. Poult Sci. 2021;100(9):101301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101301
dc.relationHassan FA, Elkassas N, Salim I, El-Medany S, Aboelenin SM, Shukry M, et al. Impacts of Dietary Supplementations of Orange Peel and Tomato Pomace Extracts as Natural Sources for Ascorbic Acid on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Plasma Biochemicals and Antioxidant Status of Growing Rabbits. Animals. 2021;11:1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061688
dc.relationNguyen DH, Lee KY, Mohammadigheisar M, Kim IH. Evaluation of the blend of organic acids and medium-chain fatty acids in matrix coating as antibiotic growth promoter alternative on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, excreta microflora, and carcass quality in broilers. Poult Sci. 2018;97(12):4351-43588. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey339
dc.relationHaque MH, Sarker S, Islam MS, Islam MA, Karim MR, Kayesh MEH, et al. Sustainable Antibiotic-Free Broiler Meat Production: Current Trends, Challenges, and Possibilities in a Developing Country Perspective. Biology. 2020;9:0411. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9110411
dc.relationMcEwen SA, Fedorka-Cray PJ. Antimicrobial use and resistance in animals. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(Suppl 3):S93-S106. https://doi.org/10.1086/340246
dc.relationCarvalho IT, Santos L. Antibiotics in the aquatic environments: A review of the European scenario. Environ Int. 2016;94:736-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.06.025
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectendocarditis infecciosa
dc.subjectinsuficiencia valvular
dc.subjectcriterios de Duke modificados
dc.subjectsoplo de aparición súbita
dc.subjectlesiones vegetativas
dc.subjectpoultry farming; prebiotic; probiotic; natural extract; growth-promoting antibiotics
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.subjectAnimal Sciences
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectVeterinary Medicine
dc.titleEfectos del uso sinérgico de eubióticos sobre parámetros productivos y alométricos en pollos de engorde de la línea Ross AP
dc.typeArtículo de investigación
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.19052/mv.vol1.iss47.10
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.coarversionVersión publicada
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de La Salle
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Ciencia Unisalle
dc.identifier.repo.urlrepourl:https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/
dc.relation.ispartofcitationissue47
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.title.translatedEffects of the synergistic use of eubiotics on productive and allometric parameters in broilers of the Ross AP line


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución