Documentary research : the impact of critical thinking in English as a foreign language argumentative writing in Colombia.

dc.contributorPérez García, Nayibe Isabel
dc.creatorUnda Ramirez, Diana Maria
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T17:10:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T18:39:07Z
dc.date.available2023-01-23T17:10:17Z
dc.date.available2023-09-07T18:39:07Z
dc.date.created2023-01-23T17:10:17Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/17914
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.identifierreponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN
dc.identifierrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8738169
dc.description.abstractLa Escritura argumentativa es una habilidad importante que ha estado presente en los entornos educativos; el desarrollo de esta habilidad ayuda a los estudiantes a tener una comprensión profunda de cualquier tema al analizar, inferir y respetar las opiniones de los demás (Van Eemeren & Grootendorst, 1992). Esta investigación documental cualitativa se llevó a cabo mediante la búsqueda en diferentes bases de datos y repositorios para recolectar información significativa, auténtica, confiable, acreditada y representativa del contexto colombiano que proviene de manuscritos y estudios investigación-acción para examinar qué nos informa la literatura sobre el impacto que el Pensamiento crítico tiene en la Escritura argumentativa de los estudiantes de inglés como lengua extranjera en los últimos 10 años. Los hallazgos exponen que el impacto que tiene el Pensamiento crítico en las prácticas de Escritura argumentativa es positivo y útil para los estudiantes de inglés como lengua extranjera; también las prácticas y las estrategias que se han implementado en los entornos académicos exitosamente.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.publisherLicenciatura en Español e Inglés
dc.publisherFacultad de Humanidades
dc.relationAcero, M. A. (2015). Life stories: a way to develop critical thinking in EFL sixth grade learners. Bogotá. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relationAhmed, J. U. (2010). Documentary research method: new dimensions. Indus 99oJournal of Management & Social Sciences, 4(1), 1-14.
dc.relationBenitez, C. R. (2020). Write creatively to think and think creatively to write. Bogotá.
dc.relationBlaxter, L., C. Hughes, and M. Tight. 1996. How to Research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
dc.relationChapetón, C. M., & Chala, P. A. (2012). EFL argumentative essay writing as a situated-social practice: A review of concepts. Folios No.36, 28-35.
dc.relationCouncil of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
dc.relationCouncil of Europe. Council for Cultural Cooperation. Education Committee. Modern Languages Division. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationCreswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
dc.relationDíaz Granados Sánchez, J. (2018.). A contextualized booklet to develop critical thinking and argumentative writing. Bogotá. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
dc.relationDurgunoğlu, A. Y. (2002). Cross-linguistic transfer in literacy development and implications for language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 52(1), 189-204.
dc.relationElder, L. (2007). The foundation for critical thinking. Defining Critical Thinking. http://www.criticalthinking.org
dc.relationFisher, A. (2001). Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationGil, L. (2018) Critical literacy development in an EFL classroom. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. Bogotá.
dc.relationHyland. (2013). Teaching and Researching Writing. New York, Routledge.
dc.relationIvanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
dc.relationLeal Hernández, M., & Gómez Rodríguez, L. F. (2016). Encouraging Critical Thinking Development in an efl Classroom through Urban Legends. Folios No.43, 137-152.
dc.relationLipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking: What can it be? Association for supervision and curriculum development.
dc.relationMEN. (2006). Estándares Básicos de Competencias en Lenguas Extranjeras: inglés; Formar en lenguas extranjeras: ¡el reto! Bogotá: MEN.
dc.relationMEN. (2017). Ley General de Educación, Ley 115-1994: Law Decree 1874. Bogotá.MEN.
dc.relationMinisterio de Educación Nacional & Instituto Colombiano para la Evaluación de la Educación (MEN-ICFES). (2020). Informe nacional de resultados del examen Saber 11 2019. Bogotá: MEN
dc.relationMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2017). Formadores nativos extranjeros 2017. Bogotá: MEN
dc.relationMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2004). Programa Nacional de Bilingüismo 2004-2019. Bogotá: MEN
dc.relationNavarrete Garzon, C. (2020). Fostering writing skills in students from tenth grade at a public school through creative writing strategies and the process writing approach. Bogotá
dc.relationNegrete, J., Hanna, R., Garcia, M. (2016). The Use of Problem-solving Tasks to promote Critical Thinking Skills in Intermediate English level students. Revista Palabra, vol. 5, 48-55 Corporación Universitaria Cecar - Sincelejo, Colombia Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. Montería, Colombia.
dc.relationNejmaoui, N. (2018). Improving EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills in Argumentative Writing. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 98-109.
dc.relationNieto Tiburcio, P. (2018). Critical Thinking to Help Students Reduce L1 Interference in FCE Writing Activities. Perú.
dc.relationOrozco, P. G. (2020). PROMOTING EFL WRITING SKILLS AND CLASSROOM INTERACTION. Bogotá.
dc.relationPaul, R., & Elder, L. (2020). Critical thinking: tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life. Rowman & Littlefield
dc.relationPei, Z., Zheng, C., Zhang, M., & Liu, F. (2017). Critical Thinking and Argumentative Writing: Inspecting the Association among EFL Learners in China. English Language Teaching. China.
dc.relationPulido, O. (2016) The Co-construction of Knowledge and the Use of Critical Thinking in Academic Virtual Forums. Universidad Santo Tomás. Colombia.
dc.relationQuehui Quispe, M. (2016). Identifying paragraph organization deficiencies in efl english students’ argumentative essays at linguistics and languages Department of UMSA (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Carrera de Lingüística e Idiomas).
dc.relationRobayo, A. & Hernández, L. (2013). Collaborative writing to enhance academic writing Development Through Project Work. HOW, 20, 130-148.
dc.relationRuiz, S. (2012). Working by Projects: A Way to Enrich Critical Thinking and the Writing Process in a Third Grade EFL Classroom. Colombia
dc.relationSánchez, J. A. (2017). Exploring students’ EFL writing through the implementation of writing for learning approach. Bogotá, Colombia.
dc.relationSánchez-Peña, D., Chapetón, C. M. (2018). Fostering the Development of Written Argumentative Competence in ELT from a Critical Literacy Approach. Revista Colombiana de Educación, (75), 159-183.
dc.relationScagnoli, N. I., & Verdinelli, S. (2013). Data Display in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200117
dc.relationStrauss, A., and Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
dc.relationToulmin,S.(2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge, U.K. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationTrim, J. (2011). Using the CEFR: Principles of Good Practice. Cambridge, UK. Cambridge ESOL
dc.relationUribe-Enciso, O. L., Enciso, D. S. U., & Daza, M. D. P. V. (2017). Critical thinking and its importance in education: some reflections. Rastros Rostros, 19(34), 78-88.
dc.relationVan Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Mahwah, NJ. Erlbaum.
dc.relationVeliz, L. & Veliz, M. (2018) An interrogation of the role of critical thinking in English language pedagogy in Chile. Teaching in Higher Education ISSN: 1356-2517 (Print) 1470-1294. Chile.
dc.relationVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
dc.relationWalton, D. N. (1996). Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ. Erlbaum.
dc.relationYogesh Kumar, S. (2007). Research Methodology. Ruchika Nath. New Delhi. India.
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.subjectEscritura académica
dc.subjectEscritura argumentativa
dc.subjectHabilidad de escritura
dc.subjectPensamiento crítico
dc.titleDocumentary research : the impact of critical thinking in English as a foreign language argumentative writing in Colombia.


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución