El régimen del desarrollo sostenible: pilares del discurso para regular la acción a través del principio de la responsabilidad colectiva

dc.contributorGarzón Acosta, Juan Nicolás
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-16T16:10:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T16:05:51Z
dc.date.available2019-01-16T16:10:55Z
dc.date.available2023-09-07T16:05:51Z
dc.date.created2019-01-16T16:10:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-26
dc.identifierComisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2018). Segundo Informe Anual Sobre el Progreso y los Desafíos de la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago: Naciones Unidas
dc.identifierBaer, J. G., Bernard, C. J., Bourliere, F., Burhenne, W. E., Gerstenmaier, E., Van der Elst, C., . . . Worthington, E. (1961). We Must Save the World's Wild Life: An International Declaration. Morges Manifesto (págs. 1-4). Morges: WWF.
dc.identifierBakari, M. E.-K. (2015). Sustainability and Contemporary Man-Nature Divide Aspects of Conflict, Alienation, and Beyond. Consilience, 195-215
dc.identifierBarnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). International Organizations as Bureaucracies. En M. Barnett, & M. Finnemore, Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (págs. 16-45). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
dc.identifierBexell, M., & Jönsson, K. (2017). Responsibility and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Forum for Development Studies, 44, 13-29.
dc.identifierBirkland, T. A. (1997). After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy and Focusing Events. Washington: Georgtown Univesity Press.
dc.identifierBraillard, P. (1982). New Political Values for a World In Crises: The Approach of the Club of Rome. International Political Science Review, 3, 238-245.
dc.identifierBriant Carant, J. (2017). Unheard voices: a critical discourse analysis of the Millennium Development Goals’ evolution into the Sustainable Development Goals. Third World Quarterly, 16-41.
dc.identifierCajigas-Rotundo, J. C. (2007). La biocolonialidad del poder. Amazonía, biodiversidad y ecocapitalismo. En S. Castro-Gómez, & R. Grosfoguel (Edits.), El giro decolonial: Refl exiones para una diversidad epistémica más allá del capitalismo global (págs. 169-194). Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores.
dc.identifierCCT. (2000). Earth Charter. Paris.
dc.identifierChaturvedi, S., & Doyle, T. (2010). Geopolitics of Climate Change and Australia’s ‘Reengagement’ with Asia: Discourses of Fear and Cartographic Anxieties. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45, 95-115.
dc.identifierCosta, O. (2005). El Estudio de los Regímenes Internacionales: el Caso del Cambio Climático. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Dret Públic i de Ciències Historicojurídiques
dc.identifierCrowther, D., Seifi, S., & Moyeen, A. (2018). Responsibility and Governance in Achieving Sustainability. En D. Crowther, S. Seifi, & A. Moyeen (Edits.), The Goals of Sustainable Development: Responsibility and Governance (págs. 1- 19). Singapur: Springer Nature.
dc.identifierDankelman, I. (2015). On the road to Sustainability. Nueva York: Programa de Desarrollo de las Naciones Unidas
dc.identifierDNP. (2018). Reporte Nacional Voluntario 2018. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación
dc.identifierDoyle, T. (1998). Sustainable Development and Agenda 21: The Secular Bible of Global Free Markets and Pluralist Democracy. Third World Quarterly, 771- 786.
dc.identifierDu Pisani, J. A. (2007). Sustainable Development - Historical roots of the Concept. Environmental Sciences, 83-96.
dc.identifierElliot, L. (2007). Improving the global environment: policies, principles and institutions. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 61, 7-14.
dc.identifierEverett, M. (1997). The Ghost in the Machine: Agency in "Poststructural" Critiques of Development. Anthropological Quarterly, 137-151.
dc.identifierFerreira, A. (2017). Between Development and Sustainability: Symbiotic Synergy or Irreconciliable Duality. Central European Review of Economic Management, 27-43
dc.identifierFoote, B. (2007). The Narrative Interactions of "Silent Spring". Bridging Literary Criticism and Ecocriticism. New Literary History, 38(On Change and Exchange in Literary Studies), 739-753.
dc.identifierFukuda-Parr, S. (2016). From the Millennium Development Goals to the Sustainable Development Goals: Shifts in Purpose, Concept, and Politics of Global Goal Setting for Development. Gender & Development, 24, 43-52.
dc.identifierGerlach, L. P. (2001). The Structure of Social Movements: Environmental Activism and its Opponents. En J. Arquilla, & D. Ronfeldt (Edits.), Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime and Militancy (págs. 289-310). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
dc.identifierGlaser, C. L. (1995). Realist as Optimists: Cooperations as Self-Help. International Security, 19, 50-90
dc.identifierGough, C., & Shackley, S. (2001). The Respectable Politics of Climate Change: The Epistemic Communities and NGOs. Royal Institute of International Affairs, 329-345.
dc.identifierHaas, E. B. (1975). On Systems and International Regimes. World Politics, 27, 147.
dc.identifierHaas, E. B. (1982). Words Can Hurt you; Or, Who Said what to Whom about Regimes. International Organization, 36(International Regimes), 207-243.
dc.identifierHaas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46, 1-35.
dc.identifierHaggard, S., & Simmons, B. A. (1987). Theories of International Regimes. International Organization, 41, 491-517.
dc.identifierHansenclever, A., Mayer, P., & Ritterberg, V. (1996). Interest, Power, Knowledge: The Study of International Regmies. Mershon International Studies Review, 40, 177-228.
dc.identifierHarrigton, N. (2015). The SDGs call for a revitalised global partnership: What should we do differently this time? Obtenido de OECD Develpoment Centre: http://www.oecd.org/dev/development-posts-sdg-global-partnership.htm
dc.identifierHasenclever, A., Mayer, P., & Rittberg, V. (1997). Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge Univerty Press.
dc.identifierHass, P. M. (1989). Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control. International Organization, 377-403.
dc.identifierHedenus, F., Persson, M., & Sprei, F. (2016). Sustainable Development: Through the Lens of Environmental History. En F. Hedenus, M. Persson, & F. Sprei, Sustainable Develpment: History, Definition & and the Role of the Engineer (págs. 3-11). Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology.
dc.identifierHerrera, A. O., Scolnik, H. D., Chichilinsky, G., Chorni, A., Gallopin, G. C., Gómez, I., . . . Wienberg, G. (1976). Catastrophe or New Society? A Latin American World Model. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre
dc.identifierHopkins, R., & Puchala, D. (1982). International Regimes: Lessons from Inductive Analysis. International Organization, 36, 245-275.
dc.identifierKeohane, R. (1989). Neoliberal Institucionalism: A perspective on World Politics. En R. Kohane, International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory (págs. 17, Nota 5). Londres: Westview Press
dc.identifierKeohane, R., & Nye, J. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politicis in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
dc.identifierKindleberger, C. P. (1986). International Public Goods without International Government. The American Economic Review, 76, 1-13.
dc.identifierKoehane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 2, 379-396.
dc.identifierKowalski, R. (2013). Sense And Sustainability: The Paradoxes That Sustains. World Futures, 69, 75-88.
dc.identifierKrasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 185-205.
dc.identifierKratochwil, F. V. (1989). Rules, norms and decisions. On the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifierLomborg, B., & Rubin, O. (2002). Limits to Growth. Foreign Policy, 42-44.
dc.identifierLonghofer, W., & Schofer, E. (2010). National and Global Origins of Environmental Association. American Sociology Review, 75, 505-533.
dc.identifierLuhmann, N. (1989). Ecological Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifierMcNeill, D., & Fukuda-Parr, S. (2015). Post 2015: a new era of accountability? Journal of Global Ethics, 10-17.
dc.identifierMeadowcroft, J. (1997). Planning, Democracy and the Challenge of Sustainable Development. International Political Science Review, 18, 167-189.
dc.identifierMiddelton, N., Moyo, S., & O'Keefe, P. (1993). Tears of the Crocodile: From Rio to Reality in Developing World. Chicago: Pluto Press.
dc.identifierO'donell, G. (2004). Accountability Horizontal: la Institucionalización Legal de la Desconfianza Política. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 11-31.
dc.identifierONU. (1992). Declaración de Rio sobre el Medio Ambiente y el Desarrollo. Rio de Janeiro: A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I)
dc.identifierONU. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. Nueva York: A/RES/55/2.
dc.identifierONU. (2015). Transformar nuestro mundo: la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. Nueva York: A/RES/70/1.
dc.identifierRedclift, M. (2003). Sustainable Development: Exploring the contradictions. Londres: Routledge.
dc.identifierRedclift, M., & Woodgate, G. (2000). Sustainability and social construction. En M. Redclift, & G. Woodgate (Edits.), The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology (2da ed., págs. 55-71). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
dc.identifierRohrschneider, R., & Dalton, R. J. (2002). A Global Network? Transnational Cooperation among Environmental Groups. The Journal of Politics, 510-533.
dc.identifierRosenau, J. (1986). Before Cooperation: Hegemons, Regimes, and Habit-Driven Actors in World Politics. International Organization, 40, 849-894
dc.identifierRostow, W. W. (1991). The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifierRowlands, I. H. (1995). Politics of Global Atmospheric Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
dc.identifierSachs, W. (2000). "Sustainable Development". En M. Redclift, & G. Woodgate (Edits.), The International Handbook of Environmetal Sociology (2da ed., págs. 71-83). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc
dc.identifierSachs, W. (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals and Laudato si’: varieties of Post-Development? Third World Quarterly, 2573-2587.
dc.identifierSindal, D. (1985). The limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory. International Organization, 39, 579-614.
dc.identifierStalley, P. (2018). Norms From the Periphery: Tracing the Rise of the Common but Differentiated Principle in International Environmetal Politics. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2-22.
dc.identifierVon Wright, G. H. (1997). Progress Facts and Fiction. En A. Burgen, P. McLaughlin, & J. Mittelstrass (Edits.), The Idea of Progress (págs. 1-18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
dc.identifierWade, R. H. (2011). Boulevard of broken dreams: the inside story of the World Bank’s Polonoroeste Road Project in Brazil’s Amazon. Londres: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment / London School of Economics.
dc.identifierWCED. (1987). Our Common Future. Oslo: UN.
dc.identifierWorld Wildlife Fund. (Agosto de 2018). History. Obtenido de WWF: https://www.worldwildlife.org/about/history
dc.identifierYoung, O. R. (1980). International Regimes: Problems of Concept Formation. World Politics, 32, 331-352.
dc.identifierYoung, O. R. (1989). International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment. London: Cornell University Press.
dc.identifierYoung, O. R. (1996). Introduction: the Efectiveness of International Governance Systems. En O. R. Young, G. J. Demko, & K. Ramakrishna, Global Environmental Change and International Governance (págs. 1-30). Hanover: Darmouth Collage University Press of New England.
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/34583
dc.identifier270157
dc.identifierTE09938
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8736473
dc.description.abstractAnalizando el Informe de Brundtland, la Agenda 2030 y otros documentos de las Naciones Unidas, este texto aborda la relación entre el Desarrollo Sostenible y la Responsabilidad Colectiva desde la perspectiva de los Regímenes Internacionales. Para ello, expone un marco teórico y conceptual de las teorías de formación los Regímenes Internaciones. Analiza desde las Comunidades Epistémicas los conceptos de Desarrollo y Sostenibilidad exponiendo la dicotomía entre el crecimiento económico y el cuidado ambiental. Propone que el Desarrollo Sostenible impulsado desde las Naciones Unidas, consolida un régimen como vehículo para el discurso que influencia el actuar de los actores a través de la responsabilidad.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.publisherCiencias Políticas
dc.publisherFacultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectDesarrollo sostenible
dc.subjectRelaciones internacionales
dc.subjectProtección del medio ambiente
dc.subjectPolítica ambiental
dc.titleEl régimen del desarrollo sostenible: pilares del discurso para regular la acción a través del principio de la responsabilidad colectiva
dc.typebachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución