Cambio tecnológico sesgado, una propuesta para la contabilidad del crecimiento y la productividad

dc.contributorZuleta González, Hernando
dc.contributorGonzález Peña, José Danilo
dc.contributorZambrano Riveros, Jorge Andrés
dc.contributorMaldonado Carrizosa, Darío
dc.creatorDuarte Palacios, Germán
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-28T18:41:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T00:58:33Z
dc.date.available2023-06-28T18:41:33Z
dc.date.available2023-09-07T00:58:33Z
dc.date.created2023-06-28T18:41:33Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-05
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1992/67969
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad de los Andes
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8728032
dc.description.abstractDiversos trabajos han demostrado que la participación del trabajo en el producto es variable en el tiempo y ha venido decreciendo, contrario a lo que supuso durante varias décadas. En este trabajo, se presenta un ejercicio de contabilidad de crecimiento para un grupo de países latinoamericanos que incorpora la variación de la participación de los factores. Además, se aborda aborda el problema de las unidades de medida para conocer la abundancia relativa de factores. Como resultado, se obtienen dos índices que ayudan a caracterizar el Cambio Tecnológico Sesgado y que pueden ser utilizados como reglas de política por los tomadores de decisión
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Andes
dc.publisherMaestría en Economía
dc.publisherMaestría en Políticas Públicas
dc.publisherEscuela de Gobierno Alberto Lleras Camargo
dc.publisherFacultad de Economía
dc.relationAbramovitz, M. (1956). Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. In Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870 (pp. 1-23). NBER.
dc.relationAcemoglu 2002. Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market
dc.relationAcemoglu, D. (2007). Equilibrium bias of technology. Econometrica, 75(5), 1371-1409.Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton University Press
dc.relationAntonelli, C. (2006). ¿Localized Technological Change and Factor Markets: Constraints and Inducements to Innovation." Structural Change and Economic Dy-namics 17 (2): 224-247
dc.relationAntonelli, C. (2016). ¿Technological Congruence and the Economic Complexity of Technological Change." Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 38: 15-24
dc.relationAntonelli, C., & Quatraro, F. (2010). The effects of biased technological change on total factor productivity: Empirical evidence from a sample of OECD countries. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 361-383
dc.relationAntonelli, C., & Quatraro, F. (2013). Localized technological change and efficiency wages: The evidence across European regions. Regional Studies, 47, 1686-1700
dc.relationBarro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic Growth (2nd ed.). The MIT Press
dc.relationBernini, C., Cerqua, A., & Pellegrini, G. (2017). Public subsidies, TFP and efficiency: A tale of complex relationships. Research Policy, 46(4), 751-767
dc.relationBellón, J. R. B. (2010). EL RESIDUO DE SOLOW REVISADO. REVISED SOLOW RESIDUAL. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 10(7)
dc.relationBlanchard, O. J., 1997. The medium run. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1997(2), 89-158
dc.relationBrown, E. P., & Weber, B. (1953). Accumulation, productivity and distribution in the British economy, 1870-1938. The Economic Journal, 63(250), 263-288
dc.relationCarlaw, K., & Kosempel, S. (2004). The sources of total factor productivity growth: Evidence from Canadian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(4), 299-309
dc.relationCaselli, F. (2005). Accounting for cross-country income differences. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 679-741
dc.relationCaselli, F., & Feyrer, J. (2007). The marginal product of capital. The quarterly journal of economics, 122(2), 535-568
dc.relationCrafts, N., & Woltjer, P. (2021). Growth accounting in economic history: findings, lessons and new directions. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(3), 670-696
dc.relationChen, Y., & Liu, Y. (2021). How biased technological progress sustainably improves energy efficiency: An empirical research of the manufacturing industry in China. Energy, 230
dc.relationDai, L., Zhang, J., & Luo, S. (2022). Effective R&D capital and total factor productivity: Evidence using spatial panel data models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121886
dc.relationDávila, A. O., Fernandez Sierra, M., & Zuleta, H. (2021). The natural resource boom and the uneven fall of the labor share. Documento CEDE, (37)
dc.relationEasterly, W., & Levine, R. (2001). What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models. The world bank economic review, 15(2), 177-219
dc.relationFeder, C. (2014). Biased technological change: A contribution to the debate. LEI&BRICK Working Paper1/2014, Department of Economics, University of Torino
dc.relationFeder, C. (2018). A measure of total factor productivity with biased technological change. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(3), 243-253
dc.relationFeder, C. (2018). The effects of disruptive innovations on productivity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126(C), 186-193
dc.relationFukao, K., Makino, T., & Settsu, T. (2019). Structural Change, Capital Deepening, and TFP Growth in Japan: 1885-1970. Hitotsubashi University and IDE-JETRO. Musashi University
dc.relationHall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. The quarterly journal of economics, 114(1), 83-116
dc.relationJiménez, F. (2011). Crecimiento económico: enfoques y modelos
dc.relationJi, Y. & Wang, Y. (2014). Some comments on Antonelli and Quatraro's paper of measuring effect of biased technology on TFP. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 276-280
dc.relationKaldor, N. (1961). Capital accumulation and economic growth. In The Theory of capital: proceedings of a conference held by the International Economic Association (pp. 177-222)
dc.relationKarabarbounis, L. and Neiman, B. (2014), "The Global Decline of the Labor Share", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 129, No 1, pp. 61-103
dc.relationKarabarbounis, L. and Neiman, B. (2019), "Accounting for Factorless Income", in Eichenbaum, M. and Parker, J.A. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2018, Vol. 33, National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 167-228
dc.relationKahn, J. A., & Lim, J. S. (1998). Skilled labor-augmenting technical progress in US manufacturing. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1281-1308
dc.relationLee, J.-W. (1996). Government interventions and productivity growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 391-414
dc.relationRanasinghe, A. (2014). Impact of policy distortions on firm-level innovation, productivity dynamics and TFP. Journal of Economic Dynamics and control, 46, 114-129
dc.relationSala-i-Martin, X. (2003). Apuntes de Crecimiento Económico (2da ed.). Antoni Bosch Editor
dc.relationSequeira, T., & Morão, H. (2020). Growth Accounting and Regressions: new approach and results. International Economics, 162, 67-79
dc.relationSolow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94
dc.relationSolow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The review of Economics and Statistics, 312-320
dc.relationStigler, G. J. (1947). Trends in output. Trends in Output and Employment, 6-31
dc.relationSturgill, B., (2012). The relationship between factor shares and economic development. Journal of Macroeconomics, 34 (4), 1044-1062
dc.relationTinbergen, J. (1942). Zur theorie der langfristigen wirtschaftsentwicklung. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 511-549
dc.relationVan Ark, B. (2014). Total factor productivity: Lessons from the past and directions for the future (No. 271). NBB Working Paper
dc.relationZeira, J. (1998). Workers, Machines, and Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 13(4), pp. 1091-1117
dc.relationZuleta, H. and Young, A. T., (2013). "Labor shares in a model of induced innovation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24(C), pages 112-122
dc.relationZuleta, H. (2012). Variable Factor Shares, Measurement and Growth Accounting. Economics Letters 114, 91-93
dc.relationZuleta, H. (2008a). Seasons, savings and GDP. Documentos de Trabajo, Facultad de Economía, Universidad del Rosario, (32)
dc.relationZuleta, H., (2008b). Factor Saving Innovations and Factor Income Shares, Review of Economic Dynamics, 11 4, 836-851
dc.relationZuleta, H., Parada, J., García, A., Campo, J., (2010). Participación factorial y contabilidad del crecimiento económico en Colombia 1984-2005. Una propuesta de modificación del método de contabilidad del crecimiento Desarrollo y Sociedad, 65, 71-121
dc.relationZuleta González, H y Sturgill, B. (2015). Getting growth accounting right. Documento CEDE 29. Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.titleCambio tecnológico sesgado, una propuesta para la contabilidad del crecimiento y la productividad
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución